Dynamics and control of state-dependent networks for probing genomic organization

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 42, 2011, Pages 17257-17262

  Rajapakse, Indika ^a   Groudine, Mark ^a,b   Mesbahi, Mehran ^c  

^a USA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellular differentiation; Cellular reprogramming; Entropy; Network controllability; Network order

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; GENE CONTROL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATE DEPENDENT NETWORK;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; GATA1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HEMATOPOIESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MYOD PROTEIN;

EID: 80054811460     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113249108     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410:268-276.
2. Diestel R (2000) Graph Theory (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany).
3. Cook P (2002) Predicting three-dimensional genome structure from transcriptional activity. Nat Genet 32:347-352.
4. Rajapakse I, Groudine M (2011) On emerging nuclear order. J Cell Biol 192:711-721.
5. Weintraub H (1985) Assembly and propagation of repressed and derepressed chromosomal states. Cell 42:705-711.
6. Misteli T (2009) Self-organization in the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6885-6886.
7. Rajapakse I, et al. (2009) The emergence of lineage-specific chromosomal topologies from coordinate gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6679-6684.
8. Lieberman-Aiden E, et al. (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326:289-293.
9. Mesbahi M, Egerstedt M (2010) Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ).
10. Cao Y, et al. (2010) Genome-wide MyoD binding in skeletal muscle cells: A potential for broad cellular reprogramming. Dev Cell 18:662-674.
11. Orkin S (1992) GATA-binding transcription factors in hematopoietic cells. Blood 80:575-581.
12. Cheng Y, et al. (2009) Erythroid GATA1 function revealed by genome-wide analysis of transcription factor occupancy, histone modifications, and mRNA expression. Genome Res 19:2172-2184.
13. Biyikoglu T, et al. (2007) Laplacian Eigenvectors of Graphs: Perron-Frobenius and Faber-Krahn Type Theorems (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany).
14. Dullerud GE, Paganini F (2000) A Course in Robust Control Theory (Springer, New York).
15. Kailath T (1979) Linear Systems (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
16. Yamanaka S (2008) Pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:2079-2087.
17. Weintraub H, et al. (1989) Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:5434-5438. (Pubitemid 19185563)
18. Vierbuchen T, et al. (2010) Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463:1035-1041.
19. Liu Y-Y, et al. (2011) Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473:167-173.