Metapopulation structure and fine-scaled genetic structuring in crop-wild hybrid weed beets

Heredity

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 395-404

  Arnaud, J F ^a   Cuguen, J ^a   Fenart S ^a,b  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b Université de Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies   (France)

Author keywords

agricultural disturbances; Beta vulgaris; effective population size; mating system; seed bank; spatial genetic structure

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRID; METAPOPULATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ROOT VEGETABLE; SEED BANK; SEED DISPERSAL; WILD POPULATION;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEET; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SELF FERTILIZATION; WEED;

BAYES THEOREM; BETA VULGARIS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PLANT WEEDS; POLLINATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

BETA VULGARIS; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 80054799120     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.23     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arnaud J-F, Fénart S, Cordellier M, Cuguen J (2010). Populations of weedy crop-wild hybrid beets show contrasting variation in mating system and population genetic structure. Evol Appl 3: 305-318.
2. Arnaud J-F, Fénart S, Godé C, Deledicque S, Touzet P, Cuguen J (2009). Fine-scale geographical structure of genetic diversity in inland wild beet populations. Mol Ecol 18: 3201-3215.
3. Arnaud J-F, Viard F, Delescluse M, Cuguen J (2003). Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 1565-1571. (Pubitemid 36960286)
4. Baker HG (1974). The evolution of weeds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5: 1-24.
5. Cabin RJ (1996). Genetic comparisons of seed bank and seedling populations of a perennial desert mustard, Lesquerella fendleri. Evolution 50: 1830-1841.
6. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967). Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19: 233-257.
7. De Cauwer I, Arnaud J-F, Schmitt E, Dufay M (2010a). Pollen limitation of female reproductive success at fine spatial scale in a gynodioecious and wind-pollinated species, Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. J Evol Biol 23: 2636-2647.
8. De Cauwer I, Dufay M, Cuguen J, Arnaud J-F (2010b). Effects of fine-scale genetic structure on male mating success in gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Mol Ecol 19: 1540-1558.
9. Ellstrand NC (2003). Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 358: 1163-1170. (Pubitemid 36777296)
10. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620. (Pubitemid 40886055)
11. Fénart S, Arnaud J-F, De Cauwer I, Cuguen J (2008). Nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic diversity in weed beet and sugar beet accessions compared to wild relatives: new insights into the genetic relationships within the Beta vulgaris complex species. Theor Appl Genet 116: 1063-1077.
12. Fénart S, Austerlitz F, Cuguen J, Arnaud J-F (2007). Long distance pollen-mediated gene flow at a landscape level: the weed beet as a case study. Mol Ecol 16: 3801-3813. (Pubitemid 47397329)
13. Fievet V, Touzet P, Arnaud J-F, Cuguen J (2007). Spatial analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA diversity in wild sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) populations: do marine currents shape the genetic structure? Mol Ecol 16: 1847-1864. (Pubitemid 46639975)
14. Friedman J, Barrett SCH (2009). Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Ann Bot (Lond) 103: 1515-1527.
15. Goudet J (1995). FSTAT (Version 1.2). A computer program to calculate F-Statistics. J Hered 86: 485-486.
16. Guillot G, Mortier F, Estoup A (2005). GENELAND: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 712-715. (Pubitemid 41716893)
17. Honnay O, Bossuyt B, Jacquemyn H, Shimono A, Uchiyama K (2008). Can a seed bank maintain the genetic variation in the above ground plant population? Oikos 117: 1-5. (Pubitemid 350212603)
18. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009). Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Res 9: 1322-1332.
19. Ingvarsson PK, Olsson K (1997). Hierarchical genetic structure and effective population sizes in Phalacrus substriatus. Heredity 79: 153-161. (Pubitemid 27340955)
20. Jombart T (2008). Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24: 1403-1405. (Pubitemid 351737150)
21. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010). Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11: 94.
22. Jombart T, Pontier D, Dufour A-B (2009). Genetic markers in the playground of multivariate analysis. Heredity 102: 330-341.
23. Jorde PE, Ryman N (2007). Unbiased estimator for genetic drift and effective population size. Genetics 177: 927-935. (Pubitemid 350005644)
24. Knowles P, Perry DJ, Foster HA (1992). Spatial genetic structure in two tamarack [Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch] populations with differing establishment histories. Evolution 46: 572-576.
25. Levin DA (1981). Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 68: 233-253.
26. Lortie CJ, Munshaw M, DiTomaso J, Hierro JL (2010). The smallscale spatiotemporal pattern of the seedbank and vegetation of a highly invasive weed, Centaurea solstitialis: strength in numbers. Oikos 119: 428-436.
27. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
28. Mimura M, Barbour RC, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Watanabe KN (2009). Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol Ecol 18: 4180-4192.
29. Mörchen M, Cuguen J, Michaelis G, Hanni C, Saumitou-Laprade P (1996). Abundance and length polymorphism of microsatellite repeats in Beta vulgaris L. Theor Appl Genet 92: 326-333.
30. Oden NL, Sokal RR (1986). Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Syst Zool 35: 608-617.
31. Owen FV (1942). Inheritance of cross- and self-sterility and selffertility in Beta vulgaris. J Agric Res 64: 679-698.
32. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org; ISBN: 3-900051-07-0.
33. Ran Z, Michaelis G (1995). Mapping of a chloroplast RFLP marker associated with the CMS cytoplasm of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Theor Appl Genet 91: 836-840.
34. Richards CM, Brownson M, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Panella L (2004). Polymorphic microsatellite markers for inferring diversity in wild and domesticated sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Mol Ecol Notes 4: 243-245. (Pubitemid 38688997)
35. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228. (Pubitemid 34305718)
36. Rutledge LY, Garroway CJ, Loveless KM, Patterson BR (2010). Genetic differentiation of eastern wolves in Algonquin Park despite bridging gene flow between coyotes and grey wolves. Heredity 105: 520-531.
37. Saarinen EV, Austin JD, Daniels JC (2010). Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size in an endangered butterfly indicate a possible role for genetic compensation. Evol Appl 3: 28-39.
38. Sester M, Delanoy M, Colbach N, Darmency H (2004). Crop and density effects on weed beet growth and reproduction. Weed Res 44: 50-59. (Pubitemid 38231194)
39. Sester M, Dürr C, Darmency H, Colbach N (2006). Evolution of weed beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed bank: quantification of seed survival, dormancy, germination and pre-emergence growth. Eur J Agron 24: 19-25. (Pubitemid 41729048)
40. Sester M, Dürr C, Darmency H, Colbach N (2007). Modelling the effects of cropping systems on the seed bank dynamics and the emergence of weed beet. Ecol Model 204: 47-58. (Pubitemid 46602672)
41. Shimono A, Ueno S, Tsumura Y, Washitani I (2006). Spatial genetic structure links between soil seed banks and aboveground populations of Primula modesta in subalpine grassland. J Ecol 94: 77-86.
42. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986). Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35: 627-632.
43. Templeton AR, Levin DA (1979). Evolutionary consequences of seed pools. Am Nat 114: 232-249.
44. Van Dijk H (2004). Gene exchange between wild and crop in Beta vulgaris: how easy is hybridization and what will happen in later generations?. In: Den Nijs HCM, Bartsch D and Sweet J (eds). Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives and its Consequences. CABI publishers, Inc.: Oxfordshire, UK, pp 53-69.
45. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004). New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13: 921-935. (Pubitemid 38390597)
46. Viard F, Bernard J, Desplanque B (2002). Crop-weed interactions in the Beta vulgaris complex at a local scale: allelic diversity and gene flow within sugar beet fields. Theor Appl Genet 104: 688-697. (Pubitemid 36080402)
47. Vitalis R, Glémin S, Olivieri I (2004). When genes go to sleep: the population genetic consequences of seed dormancy and monocarpic perenniality. Am Nat 163: 295-311. (Pubitemid 38335224)
48. Waples RS (1989). A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics 121: 379-391. (Pubitemid 19052026)
49. Waples RS, Do C (2010). Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol Appl 3: 244-262.
50. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1990). Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution 44: 1717-1724.