Event-based estimation of water budget components using a network of multi-sensor capacitance probes;Estimation évènementielle des composantes du bilan hydrique en utilisant un réseau de sondes capacitives multi-capteurs

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1227-1241

  Guber, Andrey ^a   Gish, Timothy ^a   Pachepsky, Yakov ^a   McKee, Lynn ^a   Nicholson, Thomas ^b   Cady, Ralph ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

Event based method; Soil water budget; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; CAPACITANCE PROBES; EVENT-BASED; EVENT-BASED METHOD; FIXED TIME INTERVAL; GROUND WATER RECHARGE; MARYLAND , USA; MULTI SENSOR; RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION; SOIL HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; SOIL WATER; SOIL WATER BUDGET; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SOIL WATER FLUXES; SOIL WATER STORAGE; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; TIME INTERVAL; TIME-SERIES DATA; UNCERTAINTY; WATER BUDGET COMPONENTS;

BUDGET CONTROL; ESTIMATION; RAIN; SOIL MOISTURE; TIME SERIES; WATER CONTENT; WATER SUPPLY;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUNDWATER; INFILTRATION; RECHARGE; SOIL WATER; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER BUDGET; WATER CONTENT;

EID: 80054778965     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.609485     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen, G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/x0490e00. htm#Contents [Accessed 29 July 2005].
2. Bauer, S.W., 1974. A modified Horton equation for infiltration during intermittent rainfall. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, XIX, 2/6, 219-225.
3. Brakensiek, D.L. and Rawls, W.J., 1988. Effects of agricultural and rangeland management system on infiltration. Modeling Agricultural, Forest, and Rangeland Hydrology. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 247.
4. Bruce, R.R. and Whisler, F.D., 1973. Infiltration of water into layered field soils. In: A. Hadas, et al., eds. Physical aspects of soil, water and salts in ecosystems. Ecological studies, V.4. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 77-89.
5. Epstein, E. and Grant, W.J., 1973. Soil crust formation as affected by raindrop impact. In: A. Hadas, et al., eds. Physical aspects of soil, water and salts in ecosystems. Ecological studies, V.4. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 195-201.
6. Evett, S.R., Howell, T.A., Steiner, J.L. and Cresap, J.L., 1993. Evapotranspiration by soil water balance using TDR and neutron scattering. In: R.G. Allen and C.M.U. Neale, eds. Management of irrigation and drainage systems, integrated perspectives. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 914-921.
7. Evett, S.R., Schwartz, R.C., Tolk, J.A. and Howell, T.A., 2009. Soil profile water content determination: spatiotemporal variability of electromagnetic and neutron probe sensors in access tubes. Vadose Zone Journal, 8, 926-941.
8. Evett, S.R. and Steiner, J.L., 1995. Precision of neutron scattering and capacitance type water content gauges from field calibrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59, 961-968.
9. Evett, S.R., Tolk, J.A., and Howell, T.A., 2006. Soil profile water content determination: sensor accuracy, axial response, calibration, temperature dependence, and precision. Vadose Zone Journal, 5, 894-907.
10. Ferre, P.A. and Topp, G.C., 2002. Time domain reflectometry. In: J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, eds. Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. Madison WI: ASA and SSSA, SSSA Book Series no. 5, 434-446.
11. Fohrer, N., Berkenhagen, J., Hecker, J.-M. and Rudolph, A., 1999. Changing soil and surface conditions during rainfall single/subsequent rainstorms. Catena, 37, 355-375.
12. Gee, G.W. and Hillel, D., 1988. Groundwater recharge in arid regions: review and critique of estimation methods. Hydrological Processes, 2, 255-266.
13. Gee, G.W. and Or, D., 2002. Particle-size analysis. In: J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, eds. Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. Madison WI, USA: ASA and SSA. SSSA Book Series no. 5, 255-293.
14. Gimenez, D., Diren, C., Miedema, R., Eppink, L.A.A.J., and Schoonderbeek, D., 1992. Surface sealing and hydraulic conductances under varying-intensity rains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56 (1), 234-242.
15. Gish, T.J., Dulaney, W.P., Daughtry, C.S.T. and Kung, K-J.S., 2002. Use of ground-penetrating radar to identify ground water pathways at the watershed scale. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 1620-1629.
16. Grebet, R. and Cuenca, R.H., 1991. History of lysimeter design and effects of environmental disturbances. In: Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements, Proceedings of the international symposium on lysimetry (23-25 July 1991, Honolulu, Hawaii). New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 10-18.
17. Guber, A.K., et al., 2008. Temporal stability in soil water content patterns across agricultural fields. Catena, 73, 125-133.
18. Hawley, M.E., Jackson, T.J. and McCuen, R.H., 1983. Surface soil moisture variation on small agricultural watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 62, 179-200.
19. Hillel, D., 1998. Environmental soil physics. New York: Academic Press.
20. Howard, K.W.F. and Lloyd, J.W., 1979. The sensitivity of parameters in the Penman evaporation equations and direct recharge balance. Journal of Hydrology, 41, 329-344.
21. Howell, T.A., Schneider, A.D. and Jensen, M.E., 1991. History of lysimeter design and use for evapotranspiration measurements. In: Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements, Proceedings of the international symposium on lysimetry (23-25 July 1991, Honolulu, Hawaii). New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1-9.
22. Le Bissonnais, Y. and Singer, M.J., 1992. Crusting, runoff, and erosion response to soil water content and successive rainfalls. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, 1898-1903.
23. Lourence, F. and Moore, R., 1991. Prefabricated weighing lysimeter for remote research stations. In: Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements, Proceedings of the international symposium on lysimetry (23-25 July 1991, Honolulu, Hawaii). New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 432-439.
24. Marek, T.H., Schneider, A.D., Howell, T.A. and Ebeling, L.L., 1988. Design and construction of large weighing monolithic lysimeters. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 31, 477-484.
25. McIntyre, D. S, 1958. Permeability measurements of soil crusts formed by raindrop impact. Soil Science, 85, 185-189.
26. Mead, R.M., Ayars, J.E. and Liu, J., 1995. Evaluating the influence of soil texture, bulk density and soil water salinity on a capacitance probe calibration. ASAE Paper 95-3264. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
27. Misstear, B.D.R., Brown, L. and Daly, D., 2008. A methodology for making initial estimates of groundwater recharge from groundwater vulnerability mapping. Hydrogeology Journal, 17, 275-285.
28. Paltineanu, I.C. and Starr, J.L., 1997. Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes: laboratory calibration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61, 1576-1585.
29. Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L. and Soni, B., 1983. Agricultural management effects on soil water processes. Part I. Soil water retention and Green-Ampt parameters. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 26, 1747-1752.
30. Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L. and Savabi, R., 1989. Infiltration parameters for rangeland soils. Journal of Range Management, 42, 139-142.
31. Reynolds, S. G, 1970. The gravimetric method of soil moisture determination. III. An examination of factors influencing soil moisture variability. Journal of Hydrology, 11, 288-300.
32. Reynolds, W.D. and Elrick, D.E., 2002. Constant head soil core (tank) method. In: J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, eds. Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. Madison WI: ASA and SSSA, SSSA Book Series no. 5, 844-858.
33. Rubin, J., 1966. Theory of rainfall uptake by soils initially drier than their field capacity and its applications. Water Resources Research, 2 (4), 739-749.
34. Rushton, K., 1997. Recharge from permanent water bodies. In: I. Simmers, ed. Recharge of phreatic aquifers in (semi)arid areas. Rotterdam: AA Balkema, 215-255.
35. Rushton, K.R. and Ward, C., 1979. The estimation of groundwater recharge. Journal of Hydrology, 41, 345-361.
36. SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1954. United States Department of Agriculture, National engineering handbook, Section 4, Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
37. Schaap, M.G., 2004. Graphic user interfaces for pedotransfer functions. In: Y. A. Pachepsky and W.J. Rawls, eds. Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 349-356.
38. Schwartz, R.C., Baumhardt, R.L. and Howell, T.A., 2008. Estimation of soil water balance components using an iterative procedure. Vadose Zone Journal, 7, 115-123.
39. Sophocleous, M.A., 1991. Combining the soil water balance and water-level fluctuation methods to estimate natural groundwater recharge: practical aspects. Journal of Hydrology, 124, 229-241.
40. Starr, J.L. and Paltineanu, I.C., 2002. Capacitance devices. In: J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, eds. Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. Madison WI: ASA and SSSA, SSSA Book Series no. 5, 463-475.
41. Starr, J.L. and Timlin, D.J., 2004. Using high-resolution soil moisture data to assess soil water dynamics in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone Journal, 3, 926-935.
42. Swartzendruber, D. and Hillel, D., 1975. Infiltration and runoff for small field plots under constant intensity rainfall. Water Resources Research, 11 (3), 445-451.
43. Timlin, D.J., Starr, J.L., Cady, R.E. and Nicholson, T.J., 2000. Comparison of estimated ground-water recharge using different temporal scales of field data. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6653.
44. Timlin, D., Starr, J., Cady, R. and Nicholson, T., 2003. Comparing ground-water recharge estimates using advanced monitoring techniques and models. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6836.
45. Western, A.W., and Blöschl, G., 1999. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. Journal of Hydrology, 217, 203-224.