NSERC's HydroNet: A National Research Network to Promote Sustainable Hydropower and Healthy Aquatic Ecosystems

Fisheries

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 480-488

  Smokorowski, Karen E ^a   Bergeron, Normand ^b   Boisclair, Daniel ^c   Clarke, Keith ^a   Cooke, Steven ^d   Cunjak, Rick ^e   Dawson, Jeff ^d   Eaton, Brett ^f   Hicks, Faye ^g   Higgins, Paul ^h   Katopodis, Chris ^a   Lapointe, Michel ⁱ   Legendre, Pierre ^c   Power, Michael ^j   Randall, Robert ^a   Rasmussen, Joseph ^k   Rose, George ^l   Saint Hilaire, Andre ^b   Sellars, Brent ^m   Swanson, Gary ⁿ   Winfield, Nicholas ^a   Wysocki, Roger ^o   Zhu, David ^g   more..

^a FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

^b CENTRE EAU TERRE ENVIRONNEMENT   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^h BC HYDRO   (Canada)

ⁱ MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

^l MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^m Nalcor Energy   (Canada)

ⁿ MANITOBA HYDRO   (Canada)

^o Stn 12S049   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054763783     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2011.616459     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. CEA (Canadian Electricity Association). 2009. Electricity Generation in Canada by Province and Fuel Type, 2009 in TWh. Available from http://www.electricity.ca/industry-issues/electricity-incanada/industry-data.php (accessed September 2011).
2. Clarke, K., T. C. Pratt, R. G. Randall, D. A. Scruton, and K. E. Smokorowski. 2008. Validation of the flow management pathway: effects of altered flow on fish habitat and fishes downstream from a hydropower dam. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2784:vi +111p.
3. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. 1986. Policy for the management of fish habitat. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
4. Egan, T. M. 2005. Good stewards: industry and government work to protect fish and their habitat. Hydro Review 24(5):16-23.
5. Hasler, C. T., G. C. Christie, J. Imhof, M. Power, and S. J. Cooke. 2011. A network approach to addressing strategic fisheries and aquatic sciences issues at a national scale: an introduction to a series of case studies from Canada. Fisheries 36(9): 450-453.
6. Katopodis, C. 2005. Developing a toolkit for fish passage, ecological flow management and fish habitat works. Journal of Hydraulic Research 43:451-467.
7. Klemes, V. 1978. Physically based stochastic hydrologic analysis. Advances in Hydroscience 11:285-356.
8. Magilligan, F. J., and K. H. Nislow. 2001. Long-term changes in regional hydrologic regime following impoundment in a humidclimate watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1551-1569.
9. Magilligan, F. J., and K. H. Nislow. 2005. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Geomorphology 71(1-2):61-78.
10. Oglesby, R. T. 1977. Relationship of fish yield to lake phytoplankton standing crop, production and morphoedaphic factors. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:2271-2279.
11. Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, J. R. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime-a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769-784.
12. Quigley, J. T., and D. J. Harper. 2006. Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss. Environmental Management 37:351-366.
13. Randall, R. G. 2003. Fish productivity and habitat productive capacity: definitions, indices, units of field measurement, and a need for standardized terminology. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2003/061.
14. Randall, R. G., J. R. M. Kelso, and C. K. Minns. 1995. Fish production in fresh waters-are rivers more productive than lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:631-643.
15. Randall, R. G., and C. K. Minns. 2000. Use of fish production per unit biomass ratios for measuring the productive capacity of fish habitats. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1657-1667.
16. Rawson, D. S. 1952. Mean depth and the fish production of large lakes. Ecology 33:513-521.
17. Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10:1163-1174.
18. Rosenberg, D. M., F. Berkes, R. A. Bodaly, R. E. Hecky, C. A. Kelly, and J. W. M. Rudd. 1997. Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development. Environmental Reviews 5(1):27-54.
19. Ryder, R. A. 1965. A method for estimating the potential fish production of North temperate lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 94(3):214-218.
20. Scruton, D. A., K. D. Clarke, M. M. Roberge, J. F. Kelly, and M. B. Dawe. 2005. A case study of habitat compensation to ameliorate impacts of hydroelectric development: effectiveness of re-watering and habitat enhancement of an intermittent flood overflow channel. Journal of Fish Biology 67:244-260.
21. Smokorowski, K. E., and D. Derbowka. 2008. Methods of measuring productive capacity in Canada: summaries for review at a national workshop, October 15-16, 2007. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2815: iv + 158p.
22. Smokorowski, K. E., and J. D. Dutil. 2008. Proceedings of the workshop to compare methods to quantify the productive capacity of fish habitat impacted by hydro operations. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Proceedings Series 2008/002, Ottawa, Canada
23. Smokorowski, K. E., K. J. Withers, and J. R. M. Kelso. 1998. Does habitat creation contribute to management goals? An evaluation of literature documenting freshwater habitat rehabilitation or enhancement projects. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2249: vi + 74p.