The stem cell patent landscape as relevant to cancer vaccines

Human Vaccines

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2011, Pages

  Wang, Shyh Jen ^a  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Assignee; Cancer stem cell; Patent analysis; Patent citation; Patent classification; Vaccine

Indexed keywords

CANCER VACCINE;

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; CANCER STEM CELL; CITATION ANALYSIS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA BASE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FUNDING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PATENT; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PREDICTION; STEM CELL; ARTICLE; IMMUNOTHERAPY; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

CANCER VACCINES; HUMANS; IMMUNOTHERAPY; PATENTS AS TOPIC; STEM CELLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80054760425     PISSN: 15548600     EISSN: 15548619     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/hv.7.10.17022     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Torigoe T, Hirohashi Y, Takahashi A. Development of cancer stem cell vaccine. J Immunother 2010; 33:911-2.
2. Bystryn J. Cancer stem cell vaccine US 2010.
3. Hong S. The Magic of Patent Information. [cited 2009 April 14]; Available from: http://www.wipo. int/sme/en/documents/patent-information.htm.
4. McLeod BW, et al. The 'real world' utility of miRNA patents: lessons learned from expressed sequence tags. Nature Biotechnol 2011; 29:129-33.
5. Hunt D, Nguyen L, Rodgers M. Patent search: tools and techniques. 2007, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6. Narin F. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 1994; 30:147-55.
7. Narin F, Hamilton KS. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics 1996; 36:293-310. (Pubitemid 126449885)
8. Strotmann A, Zhao D. Combining commercial citation indexes and open-access bibliographic databases to delimit highly interdisciplinary research fields for citation analysis. J Informatrics 2010; 4:194-200.
9. Bergman K, Graffm GD. The global stem cell patent landscape: implications fro efficient technology transfer and commerical development. Nature Biotechnol 2007; 25:419-24. (Pubitemid 46572838)
10. Schwartz HF. Patent Law and Practice. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 2006; 5.
11. Chandrasekharan S, et al. Propriety science, open science and the role of patent disclosure: the case of zinc-finger proteins. Nature Biotechnol 2009; 27:140-4.
12. Konski AF, Spielthenner D. Stem Cell Patents: An Analysis 2008 [cited 2009 April 14]; Available from: http://www.foley.com/files/tbl- s88EventMaterials/ FileUpload587/1567/StemCell2008.pdf.
13. Poltorak AL, Lerner PJ. Essentials of Intellectual property. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.
14. Zheng J, et al. Industry evolution and key technologies in China based on patent analysis. Scientometrics 2010.
15. Kutlaca G. Patent-related activities in Serbia from 1921 to 1995. Scientormetrics 1998; 42:171-93.
16. Meyer M, Debackere K, Glanzel W. Can applied science be 'good science'? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics 2010; 85:527-39.
17. Foster R. Innovation, the attacker's advantage. Simon and Schuster 1986.
18. Wang SJ. The obviousness rejection as a barrier to biotech patent prosecution. Nature Biotechnol 2009; 27:1125-6.
19. USPTO. USPTO 2007 Fiscal Year-End Results Demonstrate Trend of Improved Patent and Trademark Quality 2007 [cited 2011 1/26].
20. Hullmann A, Meyer M. Publications and patents in nanotechnology. Scientometrics 2003; 58:507-27.
21. Looy BV, Magerman T, Debackere K. Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics 2007; 70:441-58.
22. Meyer M. Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Scientometrics 2006; 68:545-60. (Pubitemid 44127040)
23. Wang SJ. Factors to evaluate a patent in addition to citations. Scientometrics 2007; 71:509-22.
24. Rogers EM, Rogers E. Diffusion Innovations 2003; 5.
25. Brandenberger A, Stuart H. Value-based strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1996; 5:5-24.
26. Acosta M, Coronado D, Fernández A. Exploring the quality of environmental technology in Europe: evidence from patent citations. Scientometrics 2009; 80:131-52.
27. Smith VM. Who's who in additives-a technological approach. Chemical Weekly 1993; 38:137-42.
28. Chakrabarti AK. Competition in high technology: analysis of problems of US, Japan, UK, France, West Germany and Canada. IEEE Transition of Engineering Magazine 1991; 38:78-84.