South Florida Water Management District ambient pesticide monitoring network: 1992 to 2007

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 182, Issue 1-4, 2011, Pages 485-508

  Pfeuffer, Richard J ^a  

^a SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT   (United States)

Author keywords

Pesticides; Sediment; South Florida; Surface water

Indexed keywords

ENDOSULFANS; MONITORING LOCATIONS; MONITORING NETWORK; PESTICIDE DETECTION; PRODUCT LABELS; SEDIMENT SAMPLES; SOUTH FLORIDA; SPECIFIC LOCATION; WATER CONCENTRATIONS;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; HERBICIDES; SEDIMENTOLOGY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

SURFACE WATERS;

1,1 DICHLORO 2,2 BIS(4 CHLOROPHENYL)ETHANE; 1,1 DICHLORO 2,2 BIS(4 CHLOROPHENYL)ETHYLENE; ATRAZINE; CHLORPHENOTANE; DIMPYLATE; ENDOSULFAN; ETHION; PESTICIDE; SURFACE WATER;

ATRAZINE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DDE; MONITORING SYSTEM; PESTICIDE; SURFACE WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; QUALITY CONTROL; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; RURAL AREA; SEDIMENT; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER STANDARD;

ATRAZINE; DICHLORODIPHENYL DICHLOROETHYLENE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLORIDA; FRESH WATER; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS; PESTICIDES; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80054760349     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-1892-2     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. JF Carriger GM Rand PR Gardinali WB Perry MS Tompkins AM Fernandez 2006 Pesticides of potential ecological concern in sediment from South Florida canals: An ecological risk prioritization for aquatic arthropods Soil and Sediment Contamination 15 21 45 10.1080/15320380500363095 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD28XmtF2qsQ%3D%3D
2. Davis, R. A. (Ed.) (1970). Water quality criteria data book; Vol I-organic chemical pollution of freshwater. Prepared for the USEPA, water pollution control research series 18010DPV12/70. Cambridge, MA: Arthur D. Little, Inc.
3. Federal Register (2002). March 22, 2002 Volume 67, Number 56. (pp. 13327-13328).
4. MH Fulton GI Scott ME DeLorenzo PB Key DW Bearden ED Strozier, et al. 2004 Surface water pesticide movement from the Dade county agricultural area to the everglades and Florida bay via the c-111 canal Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 73 527 534 10.1007/s00128-004-0461-6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXns1equ78%3D
5. Goss, D.; & Wauchope, R. (Eds.) (1992). The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database: II using it with soils data in a screening procedure. Fort Worth, TX: Soil Conservation Service.
6. Hartley, D.; & Kidd, H. (Eds.) (1987). The agrochemicals handbook (2nd Ed.). Nottingham, England: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
7. Hollander, M. (1973). Nonparametric statistical methods (pp. 200-208). New York: Wiley.
8. Johnson, W. W.; & Finley, M. T. (1980). Handbook of acute toxicity of chemicals to fish and aquatic invertebrates. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 137. Washington, DC.
9. Lyman, W. J.; Reehl, W. F.; & Rosenblatt, D. H. (1990). Handbook of chemical property estimation methods. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
10. MacDonald Environmental Sciences Ltd. & United States Geological Survey (2003). Development and evaluation of numerical sediment quality assessment guidelines for Florida inland waters. Report to Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Tallahassee, FL.
11. Mayer, F. L.; & Ellersieck, M. R. (1986). Manual of acute toxicity: Interpretation and database for 410 chemicals and 66 species of freshwater animals. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Publication No. 160.
12. McPherson, B. F.; Miller, R. L.; Haag, K. H.; & Bradner, A. (2000). Water quality in Southern Florida, 1996-98 (p. 32). U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1207.
13. CJ Miles RJ Pfeuffer 1997 Pesticides in canals of South Florida Archives Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 32 337 345 10.1007/s002449900194 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXktlOjsrk%3D
14. Miller, R. L.; McPherson, B. F.; & Haag, K. H. (1999). Water quality in the southern everglades and big cypress swamp in the vicinity of the tamiami trail, 1996-97 (p. 16). U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 99-4062.
15. Montgomery, J. H. (1993). Agrochemicals Desk Reference: Environmental Data. Chelsea: Lewis Publishers.
16. National Research Council Canada (1975). Endosulfan: Its effects on environmental quality. NRCC No. 14098. Ottawa, Canada.
17. Pait, A. S.; De Souza, A. E.; & Farrow, D. R. G. (1992). Agricultural pesticide in coastal areas: A national summary (p. 81). Report for Strategic Environmental Assessment Division, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, National Ocean Service, NOAA: Rockville, MD.
18. Pfeuffer, R. J. (1985). Pesticide residue monitoring in sediment and surface water within the South Florida Water Management District. Technical publication 85-2, DRE 214. West Palm Beach, FL: South Florida Water Management District.
19. Pfeuffer, R. J. (1991). Pesticide residue monitoring in sediment and surface water within the South Florida Water Management District: Volume 2. technical publication 91-01, DRE 293. West Palm Beach, FL: South Florida Water Management District.
20. RJ Pfeuffer GM Rand 2004 South Florida ambient pesticide monitoring program Ecotoxicology 13 195 205 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000023565.91904.20 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtVShu74%3D
21. Schneider, B. A. (Ed.) (1979). Toxicology handbook, mammalian and aquatic data, book 1: Toxicology data. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Government Printing Office. USEPA-5400/9-79-003.
22. LJ Schuler GM Rand 2008 Aquatic risk assessment of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida Archives Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 54 4 571 583 10.1007/s00244-007-9085-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXkt12gur0%3D
23. GI Scott MH Fulton EF Wirth GT Chandler PB Key JW Daugomah, et al. 2002 Toxicological studies in tropical ecosystems: An ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticide runoff in south Florida estuarine ecosystems Journal Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50 4400 4408 10.1021/jf011356c 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xks12rsbw%3D
24. South Florida Water Management District (2008). Field sampling quality manual. SFWMD-FIELD-QM-001-04, effective date 30 May 2008.
25. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1972). Effects of pesticides in water: A report to the states. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1977). Silvacultural chemicals and protection of water quality. Seattle, WA. EPA-910/9-77-036.
27. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1990). Suspended, cancelled, and restricted pesticides. Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 20T-1002, February 1990.
28. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1991). Pesticide ecological effects database. Ecological effects branch, office of pesticide programs. Washington, DC.
29. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1994a). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) hexazinone. EPA 738-R-94-022. September 1994.
30. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1994b). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) metalaxyl. EPA 738-R-94-017. September 1994.
31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996a). Registration eligibility decision norflurazon list a case 0229.
32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996b). Registration Eligibility Decision (RED) bromacil. EPA 738-R-96-013. August 1996.
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996c). Registration Eligibility Decision (RED) prometryn. EPA 738-R-95-033. February 1996.
34. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998a). Transmittal of EFAD (Environmental Fate and Effects Division) list a summary report for Ethion (Chemical #58401) Case #0090. 7 August 1998.
35. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998b). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) metribuzin. EPA 738-R-97-006. February 1998.
36. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998c). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) dicofol. EPA 738-R-98-018. November 1998.
37. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998d). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) methomyl. EPA 738-R-98-021. December 1998.
38. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998e). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) alachlor. EPA 738-R-98-020. December 1998.
39. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) chlorothalonil. EPA 738-R-99-004. April 1999.
40. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2002a). Reregistration eligibility decision for endosulfan. EPA 738-R-02-013. November 2002.
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2002b). Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED) fenamiphos. EPA 738-R-02-004. May 2002.
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2002c). Interim reregistration eligibility decision for chlorpyrifos. EPA 738-R-01-007. February 2002.
43. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2002d). Interim reregistration eligibility decision for naled. EPA 738-R-02-008. January 2002.
44. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003a). Ambient aquatic life water criteria for atrazine. Revised Draft EPA-822-R-03-023. October 2003.
45. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003b). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for diuron. 30 September 2003.
46. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2004). Interim reregistration eligibility decision diazinon. EPA 738-R-04-006. May 2004.
47. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria, diazinon final. EPA-822-R-05-0906. December 2005.
48. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006a). Decisions document for atrazine.
49. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006b). National recommended water quality criteria. Office of Waterand Office of Science and Technology.
50. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006c). Addendum to the 2001 ethoprop Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED). EPA 738-R-06-018. February 2006.
51. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007). Appendix 1 to 2007 Addendum: Environmental fate and ecological risk assessment of endosulfan. EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-0262-0063.1. October 2007.
52. Verschueren, K. (1983). Handbook of environmental data on organic chemicals (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Inc.