Contestable contexts: The transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data

Qualitative Research

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 570-586

  Stenvoll, Dag ^a   Svensson, Peter ^b  

^a Uni Rokkan Centre   (Norway)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

context; discourse analysis; justification; text; transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054745052     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794111413242     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Akman V.Rethinking context as a social construct.Journal of Pragmatics. 2000;32 (6): 743-759.
2. Akman V,Bazzanella C.The complexity of contexts: guest editors' introduction.Journal of Pragmatics. 2003;35 (3): 321-329.
3. Arminen I.On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction.Discourse & Society. 2000;11 (3): 435-458.
4. Billig M.The dialogic unconscious: psychoanalysis, discursive psychology and the nature of repression.British Journal of Social Psychology. 1997;36 (2): 139-159.
5. Billig M.Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis.Discourse & Society. 1999a;10 (4): 543-582.
6. Billig M.Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety.Discourse & Society. 1999b;10 (4): 572-576.
7. Blommaert J.Context is/as critique.Critique of Anthropology. 2001;21 (1): 13-32.
8. Buttny R.Putting prior talk into context: reported speech and the reporting context.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31 (1): 45-58.
9. Denzin NK.The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence.Qualitative Research. 2009;9 (2): 139-160.
10. Fitch KL.Text and context: a problematic distinction for ethnography.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31 (1): 91-107.
11. Fløttum K,Stenvoll D.Blair speeches in a polyphonic perspective: NOTs and BUTs in visions on Europe.Journal of Language and Politics. 2009;8 (2): 269-286.
12. Huckin T.Textual silence and the discourse of homelessness.Discourse & Society. 2002;13 (3): 347-372.
13. Kulick D.The importance of what gets left out.Discourse Studies. 2005;7 (4-5): 615-624.
14. Mey I.The CA/CDA controversy.Journal of Pragmatics. 2001;33 (4): 609-615.
15. Neuman Y,Bekerman Z,Kaplan A.Rhetoric as the contextual manipulation of self and nonself.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 2002;35 (1): 93-112.
16. Pomerantz A.Multiple interpretations of context: how are they useful?.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31 (1): 123-132.
17. Potter J.Cognition as context (whose cognition?).Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31:29-44.
18. Schegloff EA.Whose text? Whose context?.Discourse and Society. 1997;8 (2): 167-187.
19. Schegloff EA.Reply to Wetherell.Discourse & Society. 1998;9 (3): 413-416.
20. Schegloff EA.Schegloff's texts as Billig's data: a critical reply.Discourse & Society. 1999;10 (4): 558-572.
21. Speer SGender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London: Routledge; 2005:.
22. Stokoe EH,Smithson J.Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction.Discourse & Society. 2001;12 (2): 217-244.
23. Stokoe H,Weatherall A.Gender, language, conversation analysis and feminism.Discourse & Society. 2002;13 (6): 707-713.
24. Tracy K.Analyzing context: framing the discussion.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31 (1): 1-28.
25. Van Dijk TADiscourse as Social Interaction. Van Dijk TA, ed. London: Sage; 1997:1-37.
26. Van Dijk TASociety and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009:.
27. Wetherell M.Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue.Discourse & Society. 1998;9 (3): 387-412.
28. Widdowson HGText, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Blackwell: Oxford; 2004:.
29. Wodak R,Weiss GCommunicating Ideologies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Discourse, and Social Practice. Pütz MNeff-van Aertselaer JVan Dijk TA, ed. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2004:.