La méthode de cartographie conceptuelle pour identifier les priorités de recherche sur le transfert des connaissances en santé des populations : quelques enjeux méthodologiques

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-80

  Dagenais, Christian ^a   Ridde, Valéry ^a   Laurendeau, Marie Claire ^b   Souffez, Karine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b INSTITUT NATIONAL DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^c Axe Partage et Utilisation des Connaissances   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054732045     PISSN: 08341516     EISSN: 00077720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bigné, J.E., Aldas-Manzano, J., Küster, I., & Vila, N. (2002).The concept mapping approach in marketing : An application in the travel agencies sector. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 5(2), 87-95.
2. Bosch, S.J. (2004). Identifying relevant variables for understanding how school facilities affect educational outcomes. Architecture. Atlanta, GA : Georgia Institute of Technology.
3. Burke, J.G., O'Campo, P., Peak, G.L., Gielen, A.C., McDonnell, K.A., & Trochim, W.M. (2005). An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res, 15(10), 1392-1410. (Pubitemid 41824782)
4. Caracelli, V.J. (1989). Structured conceptualization : A framework for interpreting evaluation results. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 45-52.
5. Dagenais, C. (2006). Vers une utilisation accrue des résultats issus de la recherche par les intervenants sociaux. Quels modèles de transfert de connaissances privilégier? Les Sciences de l'éducation pour l'ère nouvelle, 39(3), 23-35.
6. Dagenais, C., & Bouchard, C. (2003). Contribution de la cartographie de concepts à la modélisation des interventions en situation de crise en protection de la jeunesse. Revue canadienne d'évaluation de programme, 18(1), 61.
7. Dagenais, C., Laurendeau, M.-C., & Souffez, K. (manuscrit soumis pour publication). Milestones for knowledge translation in population health : Setting research priorities.
8. Daughtry, D., & Kunkel, M.A. (1993). Experience of depression in college students : A concept map. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 3, 316-323.
9. Davies, P., Nutley, S., & Walter, I. (2005). Approaches to assessing the nonacademic impact of social science research. Research Unit for Research Utilization, School of Management, University of St. Andrews.
10. Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., et al. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation : Time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13-24.
11. Grimshaw, J.M., Shirran, L., Thomas, R., Mowatt, G., Fraser, C., Bero, L., et al. (2001). Changing provider behavior : An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care, 39(8 Suppl. 2), 112-145.
12. Hoagwood, K., & Olin, S.S. (2002). The NIMH blueprint for change report : Research priorities in child and adolescent mental health. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(7), 760-767. (Pubitemid 38338090)
13. Johnsen, J.A., Biegel, D.E., & Shafran, R. (2000). Concept mapping in mental health : Uses and adaptations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(1), 67-75.
14. Kremer, R., & Gaines, B.R. (1994). Groupware concept mapping techniques. Communication au 12iéme colloque annuel international « Systems documentation : Technical Communications at the Great Divide ».
15. Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 192-205. (Pubitemid 37283087)
16. Linton, R. (1989). Conceptualizing feminism : Clarifying social science concepts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 25-30.
17. Markham, K., Mintzes, J., & Jones, G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool : Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
18. Marquart, J.M. (1989). A pattern matching approach to assess the construct validity of an evaluation instrument. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 37-43.
19. Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H.T. (2003). From knowing to doing : A framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 9(2), 125-148.
20. Ostlin, P., Braveman, P., & Dachs, N. (2005). Priorities for research to take forward the health equity policy agenda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83(12), 948-953. (Pubitemid 43155114)
21. Petticrew, M., Whitehead, M., Macintyre, S.J., Graham, H., & Egan, M. (2004). Evidence for public health policy on inequalities. 1. The reality according to policymakers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(10), 811-816. (Pubitemid 39279737)
22. Ridde, V. (2008). Equity and health policy in Africa : Using concept mapping in Moore (Burkina Faso). BMC Health Service Research, 8, 90. Repéré le 16 mars, 2009, de
23. Rosas, S.R. (2005). Concept mapping as a technique for program theory development : An illustration using family support programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 389-401. (Pubitemid 41335321)
24. Rudy, S.F. (1996). A review of Delphi surveys conducted to establish research priorities by specialty nursing organizations from 1985 to 1995. Otolaryngol Head and Neck Nursing, 14(2), 16-24.
25. Schmidt, K., Montgomery, L.A., Bruene, D., & Kenney, M. (1997). Determining research priorities in pediatric nursing : A Delphi study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 12(4), 201-207.
26. Thomas, J.L., & McDonald, M.R. (1994). Toward a national agenda for occupational safety and risk control management. Professional Safety, 39(1), 18-24.
27. Trochim, W.M.K. (1989a). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1-16.
28. Trochim, W.M.K. (1989b). Concept mapping : Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 87-110.
29. Trochim, W.M.K., Cabrera, D.A., Milstein, B., Gallagher, R.S., & Leishchow, S.J. (2006). Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 538-546. (Pubitemid 43320702)
30. Trochim, W.M.K., Cook, J.A., & Setze, R. (1994). Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff's views of a supported employment program for persons with severe mental illness. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 766-775. (Pubitemid 24268719)
31. Tsui, L. (2006). A handbook on knowledge sharing : Strategies and recommendations for researchers, policymakers and service providers. Edmonton, AB : Community-University Partnership for the Study of Children, Youth, and Families.
32. Vella, K., Goldfrad, C., Rowan, K., Bion, J., & Black, N. (2000). Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. British Medical Journal, 320(7240), 976-980. (Pubitemid 30192866)
33. Ward, J.H., Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.
34. Whitehead, M., Petticrew, M., Graham, H., Macintyre, S.J., Bambra, C., & Egan, M. (2004). Evidence for public health policy on inequalities. 2. Assembling the evidence jigsaw. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(10), 817-821. (Pubitemid 39279739)