Pupylation a signal for proteasomal degradation in mycobacterium tuberculosis

Subcellular Biochemistry

Volumn 54, Issue , 2010, Pages 149-157

  Burns, Kristin E ^a   Heran Darwin, K ^b  

^a Department of Microbiology ^*

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROKARYOTA;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN;

METABOLISM; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEOLYSIS; UBIQUITINS;

EID: 80054708988     PISSN: 03060225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6676-6_12     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gottesman S. Proteolysis in bacterial regulatory circuits. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2003; 19:565-87.
2. Butler SM, Festa RF, Pearce MJ et al. Self-compartmentalized Bacteria Proteases and Pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 2006; 60:553-62.
3. Lupas A, Ziihl F, Tamura T et al. Eubacterial proteasomes. Mol Biol Reports 1997; 24:125-31.
4. Darwin KH. Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein, Proteasomes and Pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009; 7:485-91.
5. Baumeister W, Walz J, Ziihl F et al. The proteasome: Paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 1998; 92:367-80.
6. Lin G, Hu G, Tsu C et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis prcBA genes encode a gated proteasome with broad oligopeptide specificity. Mol Microbiol 2006; 59:1405-16.
7. Pouch M-N, Cournoyer B, Baumeister W. Characterization of the 20S proteasome from the actinomycete Frankia. Mol Microbiol 2000; 35:368-77.
8. Tamura T, Nagy I, Lupas A et al. The first characterization of a eubacterial proteasome: the 20S complex of Rhodococcus. CurrBiol 1995; 5:766-74.
9. Nagy I, Tamura T, Vanderleyden J et al. The 20S proteasome of Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol 1998; 180:5448-53.
10. Lupas A, Zwickl P, Baumeister W. Proteasome sequences in eubacteria. Trends Biochem Sci 1994; 19:533-34.
11. Wolf S, Nagy I, Lupas A et al. Characterization of ARC, a divergent member of the AAA ATPase family from Rhodococcus erythropolis. J Mol Biol 1998; 277:13-25.
12. Zhang X, Stoffels K, Wurzbacher S et al. The N-terminal coiled coil of the Rhodococcus erythropolis ARC AAA ATPase is neithernecessary for oligomerizationnornucleotide hydrolysis. J Struct Biol 2004; 146:155-65.
13. Darwin KH, Ehrt S, Weich N et al. The proteasome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for resistance to nitric oxide. Science 2003; 302:1963-6.
14. Nagy I, Geert S, Vanderleyden J et al. Further sequence analysis of the DNA regions with the Rhodococcus 20S proteasome structural genes reveals extensive homolgy with Mycobacterium leprae. DNA Seq 1997; 7:225-8.
15. Pearce MJ, Arora P, Festa RA et al. Identification of substrates of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome. EMBOJ2006;25:5423-32.
16. Pearce MJ, Mintseris J, Ferreyra J et al. Ubiquitin-like protein involved in the proteasome pathway of Mycobacteriumtuberculosis. Science 2008; 322:1104-7.
17. Singh A, Mai D, Kumar A et al. Dissecting virulence pathways of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through protein-protein association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:11346-51.
18. Burns KE, Liu WT, Boshoff HI et al. Proteasomal protein degradation in Mycobacteria is dependent upon a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:3069-75.
19. Pickart CM. Mechanisms Underlying Ubiquitination. Annual Review ofBiochemistry 2001; 70:503-33.
20. Striebel F, Imkamp F, Sutter M et al. Bacterial ubiquitin-like modifier Pup is deamidated and conjugated to substrates by distinct but homologous enzymes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009.
21. Iyer LM, Burroughs AM, Aravind L. Unraveling the biochemistry and provenance of pupylation: a prokaryotic analog of ubiquitination. Biol Direct 2008; 3:45.
22. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CAP. RING Domain E3 Ubiquitin Ligases. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2009; 78:399-434.
23. Borodovsky A, Ovaa H, Meester WJ et al. Small-molecule inhibitors and probes for ubiquitin- and ubiquitin-like-specific proteases. Chembiochem 2005; 6:287-91.
24. Borodovsky A, Ovaa H, Kolli N et al. Chemistry-based functional proteomics reveals novel members of the deubiquitinating enzyme family. Chem Biol 2002; 9:1149-59.
25. Hartman SC. Glutaminase from Escherichia coli. Journal ofBiologica Chemistry 1968; 243:853.
26. Prajda N. Enzyme targets of antiglutamine agents in cancer chemotherapy. Adv Enzyme Regul 1985; 24:207-23.
27. Nijman SM, Luna-Vargas MP, Velds A et al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell. 2005; 123:773-86.
28. Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP et al. Defining the Human Deubiquitinating Enzyme Interaction Landscape. Cell2009; 138:389-403.
29. Liao S, Shang Q, Zhang X et al. Pup, a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein, is an intrinsically disordered protein. Biochem J 2009; in press.
30. Chen X, Solomon WC, Kang Y et al. Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup is intrinsically disordered. J Mol Biol 2009; in press.
31. Vijay-Kumar S, Bugg CE, Wilkinson KD et al. Three-dimensional struture of ubiquitin at 2.8 A resolution. PNAS 1985; 82:3582-5.
32. Benaroudj N, Goldberg AL. PAN, the proteasome-activating nucleotidase from archaebacteria, is a protein-unfolding molecular chaperone. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:833-9.