Theoretical analysis of the effect of positioning on hemodynamic stability during pregnancy

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1094-1098

  Summers, Richard L ^a   Harrison, James M ^a   Thompson, James R ^a   Porter, John ^a   Coleman, Thomas G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY POSITION; BODY POSTURE; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK; HUMAN; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPINE POSITION; TILTING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PATIENT POSITIONING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, CARDIOVASCULAR; VENAE CAVAE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 80054702683     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01166.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Oxford CM, Ludmir J,. Trauma in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 52: 611-29.
2. Guyton AC, Jones CE, Coleman TG,. Circulatory Physiology: Cardiac Output and Its Regulation. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company, 1973.
3. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Chapter 3, Shock. In: Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors. Student Course Manual (ATLS). 8th ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, 2008.
4. Meroz Y, Elchalal U, Ginosar Y,. Initial trauma management in advanced pregnancy. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007; 25: 117-29. (Pubitemid 46509604)
5. Pearlman MD, Tintinalli JE, (eds). Emergency Care of the Woman. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
6. Bamber JH, Dresner M,. Aortocaval compression in pregnancy: the effect of changing the degree and direction of lateral tilt on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97: 256-8. (Pubitemid 36736572)
7. Kinsella SM, Whitwam JG, Spencer JA,. Reducing aortocaval compression: how much tilt is enough? BMJ. 1992; 305: 539-40.
8. Voyrs N, Ullery JC, Hanusek GE,. The cardiac output changes in various positions in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961; 82: 1312-21.
9. Eckstein KL, Marx GF,. Aortocaval compression and uterine displacement. Anesthesiology. 1974; 40: 92-6.
10. Summers RL,. Computer simulation studies and the scientific method. J Applied Animal Welfare Sci. 1998; 1: 119-31.
11. Guyton AC, Montani JP, Hall JE, Manning RD,. Computer models for designing hypertension experiments and studying concepts. Am J Med Sci. 1988; 295: 320-6.
12. Nguyen CN, Simanski O, Kähler R, et al., The benefits of using Guyton's model in a hypotensive control system. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 2008; 89: 153-61.
13. Summers RL, Ward K, Witten T, et al., Validation of a computational platform for the analysis of the physiologic mechanisms of a human experimental model of hemorrhage. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 1405-10.
14. Coleman TG,. HUMAN: mathematical model of the human body in health, disease, and during treatment. ISA Trans. 1979; 18: 65-73.
15. Coleman TG, Summers RL,. Using mathematical models to better understand integrative physiology. J Physiol Biochem. 1997; 53: 45-6.
16. Montani JP, Adair TH, Summers RL, Coleman TG, Guyton AC,. Physiological modeling and simulation methodology: from the mainframe to the microcomputer. J Miss Acad of Sci. 1989; 24: 41-54.
17. Guyton AC, Coleman TG,. Long-term regulation of the circulation: interrelationships with body fluid volumes. In:, Reeve EB, (ed). Physical Bases of Circulatory Transport Regulation and Exchange. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1967.
18. Montani JP, Adair TH, Summers RL, Coleman TG, Guyton AC,. A simulation support system for solving large physiological models on microcomputers. Int J Biomed Comput. 1989; 24: 41-54. (Pubitemid 19094602)
19. Lyon M, Blaivas M, Brannam L,. Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a marker of blood loss. Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23: 45-50.
20. Takayama T, Hirari S, Ishihara T, Yamaguchi K, Fukuda J, Kishimoto H,. Measurement of the vena cava at postmortem examination, from the upper end of the superior vena cava via the right atrium to the lower end of the inferior vena cava. Clin Anat. 2005; 6: 349-52.
21. Gillespie EC,. Principles of uterine growth in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950; 59: 949-59.
22. Shigeo S, Kunihiro Y, Naoko T, Kouich M, Manabu W, Kunihiko I,. Azygos venous blood flow while fasting, postprandially, and after endoscopic variceal ligation, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastroenterol. 1999; 34: 310-4.
23. Smith HJ, Grøttum P, Simonsen S,. Ultrasonic assessment of abdominal venous return. II. Volume blood flow in the inferior vena cava and portal vein. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1986; 27: 23-7. (Pubitemid 16111783)
24. Seitchik J, Alper C,. The estimation of changes in body composition in normal pregnancy by measurement of body water. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956; 71: 1165-75.
25. Varvel JR, Donoho DL, Shafer SL,. Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992; 20: 63-94.
26. Sargent RG,. Verification and validation of simulation models. In:, Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA, (eds). Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. 2005, pp 130-43. (Pubitemid 46188038)
27. McLennan CE,. Antecubital and femoral venous pressure in normal and toxemic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1943; 45: 568-91.
28. Scott DB, Kerr MG,. Inferior vena cava pressure in late pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1963; 70: 1044-9.
29. Secher NJ, Arnsbo P, Andersen LH, Thomsen A,. Measurements of cardiac stroke volume in various body positions in pregnancy and during Caesarean section: a comparison between thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1979; 39: 569-76. (Pubitemid 10214740)
30. Bamber JH, Dresner M,. Aortocaval compression in pregnancy: the effect of changing the degree and direction of lateral tilt on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97: 256-8. (Pubitemid 36736572)