Changes in posture through the use of simple inclines with notebook computers placed on a standard desk

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 400-407

  Asundi, Krishna ^a   Odell, Dan ^b   Luce, Adam ^c   Dennerlein, Jack T ^a,d  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Notebook peripherals; Portable computing

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT; LAPTOP COMPUTERS;

3-D MOTION ANALYSIS; AIRPORT LOUNGES; COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS; HEAD AND NECK; INPUT DEVICES; PORTABLE COMPUTING; PORTABLE ENVIRONMENTS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

MAMMALS;

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER MOUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEAD POSITION; HEAD TILTING; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NECK; NORMAL HUMAN; WRIST;

EID: 80054700461     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Asundi K., Johnson P.W., Dennerlein J.T. Does elevating and tilting the input device support surface affect typing force and postural exposures of the wrist?. Work 2011, 39(2):187-193.
2. Bergqvist U., Wolgast E., Nilsson B., Voss M. Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: individual, ergonomic, and work organizational factors. Ergonomics 1995, 38(4):763-776.
3. Berkhout A.L., Hendriksson-Larsen K., Bongers P. The effect of using a laptopstation compared to using a standard laptop PC on the cervical spine torque, perceived strain and productivity. Appl. Ergon. 2004, 35(2):147-152.
4. Delisle A., Lariviere C., Plamondon A., Imbeau D. Comparison of three computer office workstations offering forearm support: impact on upper limb posture and muscle activation. Ergonomics 2006, 49(2):139-160.
5. Dennerlein J.T., Johnson P.W. Different computer tasks affect the exposure of the upper extremity to biomechanical risk factors. Ergonomics 2006, 49(1):45-61.
6. Dennerlein J.T., Johnson P.W. Changes in upper extremity biomechanics across different mouse positions in a computer workstation. Ergonomics 2006, 49(14):1456-1469.
7. Gerr F., Monteilh C.P., Marcus M. Keyboard use and musculoskeletal outcomes among computer users. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2006, 16(3):265-277.
8. Harms-Ringdahl K. On assessment of shoulder exercise and load-elicited pain in the cervical spine. Biomechanical analysis of load-EMG-methodological studies of pain provoked by extreme position. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. Suppl. 1986, 14:1-40.
9. Hunting W., Laubli T., Grandjean E. Postural and visual loads at VDT workplaces. I. Constrained postures. Ergonomics 1981, 24(12):917-931.
10. Keir P.J., Bach J.M., Hudes M., Rempel D.M. Guidelines for wrist posture based on carpal tunnel pressure thresholds. Hum. Factors 2007, 49(1):88-99.
11. Kotani K., Barrero L.H., Lee D.L., Dennerlein J.T. Effect of horizontal position of the computer keyboard on upper extremity posture and muscular load during computer work. Ergonomics 2007, 50(9):1419-1432.
12. Kroemer K., Grandjean E. Fitting the Task to the Human 1997, Taylor and Francis Ltd, Bristol, PA.
13. Lindegard A., Karlberg C., Wigaeus Tornqvist E., Toomingas A., Hagberg M. Concordance between VDU-users' ratings of comfort and perceived exertion with experts' observations of workplace layout and working postures. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36(3):319-325.
14. Liu C.W., Chen T.W., Wang M.C., Chen C.H., Lee C.L., Huang M.H. Relationship between carpal tunnel syndrome and wrist angle in computer workers. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2003, 19(12):617-623.
15. Mann J. Notebook sales exceed PC sales says IDC (online). TechSpot.com Available from:, (accessed October 2008). http://www.techspot.com/news/32269-notebook-sales-exceed-pc-sales-says-idc.html.
16. Marcus M., Gerr F., Monteilh C., Ortiz D.J., Gentry E., Cohen S., Edwards A., Ensor C., Kleinbaum D. A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2002, 41(4):236-249.
17. Moffet H., Hagberg M., Hansson-Risberg E., Karlqvist L. Influence of laptop computer design and working position on physical exposure variables. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17(5):368-375.
18. Oude Hengel K.M., Houwink A., Odell D., van Dieen J.H., Dennerlein J.T. Smaller external notebook mice have different effects on posture and muscle activity. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2008, 23(6):727-734.
19. Price J.A., Dowell W.R. Laptop configurations in offices: effects on posture and discomfort. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois 1998.
20. Rempel D., Dahlin L., Lundborg G. Pathophysiology of nerve compression syndromes: response of peripheral nerves to loading. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1999, 81(11):1600-1610.
21. Rempel D., Barr A., Brafman D., Young E. The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. Appl. Ergon. 2007, 38(3):293-298.
22. Saito S., Miyao M., Kondo T., Sakakibara H., Toyoshima H. Ergonomic evaluation of working posture of VDT operation using personal computer with flat panel display. Ind. Health 1997, 35(2):264-270.
23. Schuldt K., Ekholm J., Harms-Ringdahl K., Nemeth G., Arborelius U.P. Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder muscle activity. Ergonomics 1986, 29(12):1525-1537.
24. Simoneau G.G., Marklin R.W. Effect of computer keyboard slope and height on wrist extension angle. Hum. Factors 2001, 43(2):287-298.
25. Seghers J., Jochem A., Spaepen A. Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings. Ergonomics 2003, 46(7):714-730.
26. Sommerich C.M., Joines S.M., Psihogios J.P. Effects of computer monitor viewing angle and related factors on strain, performance, and preference outcomes. Hum. Factors 2001, 43(1):39-55.
27. Sommerich C.M., Starr H., et al. Effects of notebook computer configuration and task on user biomechanics, productivity, and comfort. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2002, 30:7-31.
28. Starr S.J., Shute S.J., Thompson C.R. Relating posture to discomfort in VDT use. J. Occup. Med. 1985, 27(4):269-271.
29. Straker L., Jones K.J., Miller J. A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Appl. Ergon. 1997, 28(4):263-268.
30. Szeto G.P., Lee R. An ergonomic evaluation comparing desktop, notebook, and subnotebook computers. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002, 83(4):527-532.
31. Tornqvist E.W., Hagberg M., Hagman M., Risberg E.H., Toomingas A. The influence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among professional computer users. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2009, 82(6):689-702.
32. Turville K.L., Psihogios J.P., Ulmer T.R., Mirka G.A. The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. Appl. Ergon. 1998, 29(4):239-246.
33. Villanueva M.B., Jonai H., Saito S. Ergonomic aspects of portable personal computers with flat panel displays (PC-FPDs): evaluation of posture, muscle activities, discomfort and performance. Ind. Health 1998, 36(3):282-289.
34. Wahlstrom J., Hagberg M., Toomingas A., Wigaeus Tornqvist E. Perceived muscular tension, job strain, physical exposure, and associations with neck pain among VDU users; a prospective cohort study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004, 61(6):523-528.
35. Winkel J., Mathiassen S.E. Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. Ergonomics 1994, 37(6):979-988.