Attract: A method for identifying core pathways that define cellular phenotypes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2011, Pages

  Mar, Jessica C ^a,b   Matigian, Nicholas A ^c   Quackenbush, John ^a,b,c   Wells, Christine A ^c,d  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC DATABASE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PHENOTYPE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CELLS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; RIBOSOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHENOTYPE; RIBOSOMES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 80054119877     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025445     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Müller F, Laurent L, Kostka D, Ulitsky I, Williams R, et al. (2008) Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines. Nature 455: 401-405.
2. Ulitsky I, Shamir R, (2009) Identifying functional modules using expression profiles and confidence-scored protein interactions. Bioinformatics 25: 1158-1164.
3. Kanehisa M, Goto S, (2000) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27-30.
4. Irizarray R, Wang C, Zhou Y, Speed T, (2009) Gene set enrichment analysis made simple. Stat Methods Med Res 18: 565-575.
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate- a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57: 289-300.
6. Niehrs C, Pollet N, (1999) Synexpression groups in eukaryotes. Nature 402: 483-487.
7. Mar JC, Wells CA, Quackenbush J, (2011) Defining an Informativeness Metric for Clustering Gene Expression Data. Bioinformatics 27: 1094-1100.
8. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA, (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nature Protoc 4: 44-57.
9. Dennis G, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biology 4: 3.
10. Smyth GK, (2004) Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3: Article 3.
11. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, et al. (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 15545-15550.
12. Jiang Z, Gentleman R, (2007) Extensions to gene set enrichment. Bioinformatics 23: 306-313.
13. Oron AP, Jiang Z, Gentleman R, (2008) Gene set enrichment analysis using linear models and diagnostics. Bioinformatics 24: 2586-2591.
14. Horvath S, Dong J, (2008) Geometric interpretaion of gene coexpression network analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 4: e1000117.
15. Mason M, Fan G, Plath K, Zhou Q, Horvath S, (2009) Signed weighted gene co-expression network analysis of transcriptional regulation in murine embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics 10: 327.
16. Zhang B, Horvath S, (2005) A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4: Article17.