Molecular systematics of the leptodeirini (Colubroidea: Dipsadidae) Revisited: Species-tree analyses and multi-locus data

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 3, 2011, Pages 407-417

  Mulcahy, Daniel G ^a,b   Beckstead, Thomas H ^b   Sites Jr , Jack W ^b  

^a SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DIVERGENCE; FROG; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROTEIN; SNAKE; TAXONOMY; TOPOLOGY; VINE;

ANURA; ATRACTUS; COLUBROIDEA; CRYOPHIS HALLBERGI; DIPSAS; HYPSIGLENA; IMANTODES; INVERTEBRATA; LEPTODEIRA; OXYBELIS; PSEUDOLEPTODEIRA; SERPENTES; SIBON; SQUAMATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 80054115426     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CH-10-058     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller, and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20:255-266. (Pubitemid 36237384)
2. Belfiore, M. 2010. Developing nuclear sequences for species tree estimation in nonmodel organisms: insights from a case study of Bottae's pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae, p. 175-191. In: Estimating Species Trees. Practical and Theoretical Aspects. L. L. Knowles and L. S. Kubatko (eds.). Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey.
3. Cadle, J. E. 1984. Molecular systematics of neotropical xenodontine snakes: II. Central American xenodontines. Herpetologica 40:21-30.
4. Cadle, J. E., and H. W. Greene. 1993. Phylogenetic patterns, biogeography, and the ecological structure of neotropical snake assemblages, p. 281-293. In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical Perspectives. R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schleter (eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Cadle, J. E., and V. M. Sarich. 1981. An immunological assessment of the phylogenetic position of New World coral snakes. Journal of Zoology 195:157-167.
6. Campbell, J. A., and E. N. Smith. 1998. A new genus and species of colubrid snake from the Sierra de las Minas of Guatemala. Herpetologica 54:207-220. (Pubitemid 28281589)
7. Carstens, B. C., and L. L. Knowles. 2007. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Systematic Biology 56:400-411. (Pubitemid 46826903)
8. Castillo-Raḿirez, S., L. Liu, D. Pearl, and S. V. Edwards. 2010. Bayesian estimation of species trees: a practical guide to optimal sampling and analysis, p. 15-33. In: Estimating Species Trees. Practical and Theoretical Aspects. L. L. Knowles and L. S. Kubatko (eds.). Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey.
9. Cope, E. D. 1887. Catalogue of the batrachians and reptiles of Central America and Mexico. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 32:1-98.
10. Daza, J. M., E. N. Smith, V. P. Páez, and C. L. Parkinson. 2009. Complex evolution in the Neotropics: the origin and diversification of the widespread genus Leptodeira (Serpentes: Colubridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53:653-667.
11. Degnan, J. H., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:332-340.
12. Degnan, J. H., and L. A. Salter. 2005. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 59:24-37. (Pubitemid 40181296)
13. Dowling, H. G., R. Highton, G. C. Maha, and L. R. Maxon. 1983. Biochemical evaluation of colubrid snake phylogeny. Journal of Zoology 201:309-329.
14. Dowling, H. G., and J. V. Jenner. 1987. Taxonomy of American xenodontine snakes. II. The status and relationships of Pseudoleptodeira. Herpetologica 43:190-200.
15. Duellman, W. E. 1958a. A monographic study of the colubrid snake genus Leptodeira. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History 114:1-152.
16. Duellman, W. E. 1958b. Systematic status of the colubrid snake, Leptodeira discolor Günther. University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11:1-9.
17. Edwards, S. V. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63:1-19.
18. Edwards, S. V., L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:5936-5941. (Pubitemid 47175637)
19. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17:368-376. (Pubitemid 11016207)
20. Funk, D. J., and K. E. Omland. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:397-423. (Pubitemid 38171425)
21. Günther, A. 1860. On new reptiles and fishes from Mexico. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1860: 316-319.
22. Günther, A. 1885-1902. Reptilia and Batrachia: Biologia Centrali-Americana. Taylor and Francis, London.
23. Haag-Liautard, C., N. Coffey, D. Houle, M. Lynch, B. Charlesworth, and P. D. Keightley. 2008. Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosoph-ila melanogaster. PLoS 6:e204.
24. Harmon, L. J., J. A. Schulte, A. Larson, and J. B. Losos. 2003. Tempo and mode of evolutionary radiation in iguanian lizards. Science 301:961-964. (Pubitemid 36994807)
25. Hillis, D. M., and J. T. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42:182-192.
26. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and B. Rannala. 2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities. Systematic Biology 53:904-913.
27. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755. (Pubitemid 32851390)
28. Knowles, L. L. 2009. Estimating species trees: methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. Systematic Biology 58:463-467.
29. Knowles, L. L., and L. S. Kubatko. 2010. Estimating species trees: an introduction to concepts and models, p. 1-14. In: Estimating Species Trees. Practical and Theoretical Aspects. L. L. Knowles and L. S. Kubatko (eds.). Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey.
30. Kubatko, L. S., B. C. Carstens, and L. L. Knowles. 2009. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 25:971-973.
31. Kubatko, L. S., and C. Meng. 2010. Accommodating hybridization in a multilocus phylogenetic framework, p. 99-113. In: Estimating Species Trees. Practical and Theoretical Aspects. L. L. Knowles and L. S. Kubatko (eds.). Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey.
32. Leaché, A. D. 2009. Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in North American fence lizards (Sceloporus). Systematic Biology 58:547-559.
33. Leaché, A. D., and J. A. McGuire. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of horned lizards (Phrynosoma) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data: evidence for a misleading mitochondrial gene tree. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39:628-644.
34. Leviton, A. E., R. H. Gibbs, Jr., E. Heal, and C. E. Dawson. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985: 802-832.
35. Liu, L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 24:2542-2543.
36. Liu, L., and D. K. Pearl. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Systematic Biology 56:504-514.
37. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46:523-536.
38. Maddison, W. P., and L. L. Knowles. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Systematic Biology 55:21-30.
39. Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2005. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Ver. 4.08, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
40. Meng, C., and L. S. Kubatko. 2009. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model. Theoretical Population Biology 75:35-45.
41. Mulcahy, D. G. 2006. Historical biogeography of North American nightsnakes and their relationships among the dipsadines: evidence for vicariance associated with Miocene formations of northwestern Mexico. Unpubl. Ph.D. diss., Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
42. Mulcahy, D. G. 2007. Molecular systematics of neotropical cat-eyed snakes: a test of the monophyly of Leptodeirini (Colubridae: Dipsadinae) with implications for character evolution and biogeography. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92:483-500. (Pubitemid 47620865)
43. Mulcahy, D. G. 2008. Phylogeography and species boundaries of the western North American nightsnake (Hypsi-glena torquata): revisiting the subspecies concept. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46:1095-1115.
44. Mulcahy, D. G., and J. R. Macey. 2009. Vicariance and dispersal form a ring distribution in nightsnakes around the Gulf of California. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53:537-546.
45. Mulcahy, D. G., A. Spaulding, J. R. Mendelson, III, and E. D. Brodie, Jr. 2006. Phylogeography of the Flat-tailed Horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) and systematics of the P. mcallii-platyrhinos mtDNA complex. Molecular Ecology 15:1807-1826. (Pubitemid 43725668)
46. Myers, C. W. 2011. A new genus and new tribe for Enicognathus melanauchen Jan, 1863, a neglected South American snake (Colubridae: Xenodontinae), with taxo-nomic notes on some Dipsadinae. American Museum Novitates 3715:1-33.
47. Myers, C. W., and J. A. Campbell. 1981. A new genus and species of colubrid snake from the Sierra Madre del Sur of Guerrero, Mexico. American Museum Novitates 2708:1-20.
48. Nylander, J. A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Uppsala University. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
49. de Oliveira, L., C. Jared, A. L. de Costa Prudente, H. Zaher, and M. M. Antoniazzi. 2008. Oral glands in dipsadine "goo-eater" snakes: morphology and histochemistry of the infralabial glands in Atractus reticulatus, Dipsas indica, and Sibynomorphus mikaniistar. Toxicon 51:898-913.
50. Peters, J. A. 1960. The snakes of the subfamily Dipsadinae. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 114:1-228.
51. Pinou, T., S. Vicario, M. Marschner, and A. Caccone. 2004. Relict snakes of North America and their relationships within Caenophidia, using likelihood-based Bayesian methods on mitochondrial sequences. Molecular Phylo-genetics and Evolution 32:563-574. (Pubitemid 38836855)
52. Rambaut, A., and A. J. Drummond. 2004. TRACER, Ver. 1.4.1. University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
53. Reyes-Velasco, J., and D. G. Mulcahy. 2010. Additional taxonomic remarks on the genus Pseudoleptodeira (Ser-pentes: Colubridae) and the phylogenetic placement of "P. uribei." Herpetologica 66:99-110.
54. Savage, J. M. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica. The University Chicago Press, Chicago.
55. Sazima, I. 1989. Feeding behavior of the snail-eating snake, Dipsas indica. Journal of Herpetology 23:464-468.
56. Slowinski, J. B., A. Knight, and A. P. Rooney. 1997. Inferring species trees from gene trees: a phylogenetic analysis of the Elapidae (Serpentes) based on the amino acid sequences of venom proteins. Molecular Phyloge-netics and Evolution 8:349-362. (Pubitemid 127347894)
57. Slowinski, J. B., and R. D. M. Page. 1999. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data? Systematic Biology 48:814-825. (Pubitemid 129490565)
58. Spinks, P. Q., and H. B. Shaffer. 2009. Conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies for the widely disjunct Emys (Testudines: Emydidae) species complex, and what they tell us about biogeography and hybridization. Systematic Biology 58:1-20.
59. Stamatakis, A., P. Hoover, and J. Rougemont. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57:758-771.
60. Stamatakis, A., T. Ludwig, and H. Meier. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21:456-463. (Pubitemid 40310232)
61. Tanner, W. W. 1946. A taxonomic study of the genus Hypsiglena. Great Basin Naturalist 5:25-92. [Note: printed date is 1944]
62. Taub, A. M. 1967. Comparative histological studies on Duvernoy's gland of colubrid snakes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 138:1-50.
63. Taylor, E. H. 1938. Notes on the Mexican snakes of the genus Leptodeira, with a proposal of a new snake genus, Pseudoleptodeira. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 25:315-355.
64. Townsend, T. M., R. E. Alegre, S. T. Kelley, J. J. Wiens, and T. W. Reeder. 2008. Rapid development of multiple nuclear loci for phylogenetic analysis using genomic resources: an example from squamate reptiles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47:129-142.
65. Vidal, N., M. Dewynter, and D. J. Gower. 2010. Dissecting the major American snake radiation: a molecular phylog-eny of the Dipsadidae Bonaparte (Serpentes, Caenophi-dia). Comptes Rendus Biologies 333:48-55.
66. Vidal, N., S. G. Kindl, A. Wong, and S. B. Hedges. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of xenodontine snakes inferred from 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14:389-402. (Pubitemid 30181322)
67. Zaher, H. 1999. Hemipenial morphology of the South American xenodontine snakes, with a proposal for a monophyletic Xenodontinae and a reappraisal of colu-broid hemipenes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 240:1-168.
68. Zaher, H., F. G. Grazziotin, J. E. Cadle, R. W. Murphy, J. C. Moura-Leite, and S. L. Bonatto. 2009. Molecular phy-logeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes, Caenophidia) with an emphasis on the South American xenodontines: a revised classification and descriptions of new taxa. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 49:115-153.