Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1-22

  Legge, Gordon E ^a   Bigelow, Charles A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical print size; Reading speed; Type size; X height

Indexed keywords

BOOK; HUMAN; PRINTING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PUBLICATION; READING; REVIEW; STATISTICS; VISION;

BOOKS; HUMANS; NEWSPAPERS; PRINTING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 80054112961     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.5.1     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Akutsu, H., Legge, G. E., Ross, J. A., & Schuebel, K. J. (1991). Psychophysics of reading: X. Effects of age-related changes in vision. Journal of Gerontology, 46, 325-331.
2. Arditi, A. (1996). Typography, print legibility, and low vision. In R. Cole & B. Rosenthal (Eds.), Remediation and management of low vision (pp. 237-248). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
3. Arnold, E. (1969). Modern newspaper design. New York: Harper & Row.
4. Bigelow, C. (1989). Form, pattern, & texture in the typographic image. Fine Print, 15, 75-82.
5. Bigelow, C., & Day, D. (1983). Digital typography. Scientific American, 249, 106-119.
6. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
7. Campbell, F. W., & Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. The Journal of Physiology, 197, 551-566.
8. Carter, H. (1969). A view of early typography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Carter, H. (1984). Optical scale in type founding. Printing Historical Society Bulletin, 13, 144-148. (Original work published 1937, Typography 4, 2-8)
10. Caslon,W. (1786). A specimen of printing types by William Caslon, letter
11. Chambers, D. (1986). Specimen of modern printing types by Edmund Fry, 1828. London: Printing Historical Society.
12. Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H., & Shimojo, S. (2006). The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist, 167, E117-E139.
13. Chung, S. T., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (1998). Psychophysics of reading: XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research, 38, 2949-2962.
14. Chung, S. T., & Tjan, B. S. (2009). Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of reading in central and peripheral vision. Journal of Vision, 9(9):1, 611-619, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/9/9/16, doi:10.1167/9.9.16.
15. Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E., & Tjan, B. S. (2002). Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 42, 2137-2152.
16. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M., et al. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291-307.
17. Cohen, L., Lehericy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125, 1054-1069.
18. Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain. New York: Viking.
19. DeMarco, L., & Massof, R. (1997). Distributions of print sizes in U.S. newspapers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 9-13.
20. Drasdo, N., & Fowler, C. W. (1974). Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 58, 709-714.
21. Dreyfus, J. (1995). The invention of spectacles and the advent of printing. In Into print: Selected writings on printing history, typography, and book production (pp. 298-310). Boston: David R. Godine.
22. Dreyfus, J., Johnson, A., Carter,H., Carter,M., Hoeflake, N., & Parker, M. (1963). Type specimen facsimiles. London: Bowes & Bowes.
23. Ferguson, W. C. (1989). Pica roman type in Elizabethan England. Aldershot, UK: Scolar Press.
24. Fournier, P.-S. (1766). Manuel typographique (vol. 2). Paris: Fournier.
25. Frutiger, A. (1989). Signs and symbols (A. Bluhm, Trans.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
26. Fry, J. (1786). A specimen of printing types by Joseph Fry and Sons, letter-founders, Worship Street, Moorfields, London, 1785. In E. Chambers & A. Rees (Eds.), Cyclopaedia (vol. 3). London: J. F. & C. Rivington.
27. Ginsburg, A. P. (1978). Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data (vols. I and II). Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Report AMRL-TR-78-129. Dayton, OH:Wright-Patterson AFB.
28. Gorissen, G. (Ed.) (1980). E2 Berthold fototypes body types (vol. 1). Berlin, Germany: H. Berthold.
29. Haebler, K. (1927). Italian incunabula. Munich, Germany: Weiss & Co. Antiquariat.
30. Haegerstrom-Portnoy, G., Schneck, M. E., & Brabyn, J. A. (1999). Seeing into old age: Vision function beyond acuity. Optometry & Vision Science, 76, 141-158.
31. He, S., Liu, H., Jiang, Y., Chen, C., Gong, Q., & Weng, X. (2009). Transforming a left lateral fusiform region into VWFA through training in illiterate adults [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):853, 853a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/8/853, doi:10.1167/ 9.8.853.
32. Huey, E. B. (1908/1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Jones, M., & Mewhort, D. (2004). Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 388-396.
34. Karow, P. (1993). Typeface statistics. Hamburg, Germany: URW.
35. Kowler, E., & Anton, S. (1987). Reading twisted text: Implications for the role of saccades. Vision Research, 27, 45-60.
36. Legge, G. E. (2007). Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Legge, G. E., Cheung, S. H., Yu, D., Chung, S. T., Lee, H. W., & Owens, D. P. (2007). The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision, 7(2):9, 1-15, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/2/9, doi:10.1167/7.2.9.
38. Legge, G. E., Hooven, T. A., Klitz, T. S., Mansfield, J. S., & Tjan, B. S. (2002). Mr. Chips 2002: New insights from an ideal-observer model of reading. Vision Research, 42, 2219-2234.
39. Legge, G. E., Klitz, T. S., & Tjan, B. S. (1997). Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading. Psychological Review, 104, 524-553.
40. Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. (2001). Psychophysics of reading: XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41, 725-743.
41. Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading: I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239-252.
42. Legge, G. E., Rubin, G. S., & Luebker, A. (1987). Psychophysics of reading: V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Research, 27, 1165-1177.
43. Legros, L., & Grant, J. (1916). Typographical printingsurfaces. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
44. Linotype (1940). Specimen book Linotype faces. Brooklyn, NY: Mergenthaler Linotype.
45. Linotype (n.d.). Corona. Brooklyn, NY: Mergenthaler Linotype.
46. Livingstone, M. S. (2000). Is it warm? Is it real? Or just low spatial frequency? Science, 290, 1299.
47. Majaj, N., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184.
48. Mansfield, J. S., Ahn, S. J., Legge, G. E., & Luebker, A. (1993). A new reading acuity chart for normal and low vision. In Ophthalmic and visual optics/noninvasive assessment of the visual system: Summaries, Technical digest series (vol. 3, pp. 232-235). Washington, DC: Optical Society of America.
49. Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (2007). The MNREAD acuity chart. In Legge, G.E.: Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Mansfield, J. S., Legge, G. E., & Bane, M. C. (1996). Psychophysics of reading: XV. Font effects in normal and low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37, 1492-1501.
51. Microsoft (1995). TrueType fundamentals. In TrueType 1.0 Font Files Technical Specification, Revision 1.66, August 1995 (pp. 3-27). Redmond, WA: Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/typography/SpecificationsOverview.mspx.
52. Noordzij, G. (2005). The stroke theory of writing (P. Enneson, Trans.). London: Hyphen Press.
53. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). New York: Elsevier.
54. Oruç, I., & Landy, M. S. (2009). Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification. Journal of Vision, 9(9):4, 1-19, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/9/4, doi:10.1167/9.9.4.
55. Parish, D. H., & Sperling, G. (1991). Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, and the efficiency of letter discrimination. Vision Research, 31, 1399-1415.
56. Pelli, D. G. (1999). Close encountersVAn artist shows that size affects shape. Science, 285, 844-846.
57. Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., &Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2):20, 21-36, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/2/20, doi:10.1167/7.2.20.
58. Radner, W., Willinger, U., Obermayer, W., Mudrich, C., Velikay-Parel, M., & Eisenwort, B. (1998). A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 213, 174-181.
59. Rubin, G. S., & Turano, K. (1992). Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 32, 895-902.
60. Schade, O. H. (1956). Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 46, 721-739.
61. Sheedy, J., Subbaram, M., Zimmerman, A., & Hayes, J. (2005). Text legibility and the letter superiority effect. Human Factors, 47, 797-815.
62. Shieh, K. K., & Lee, D. S. (2007). Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays. Applied Ergonomics, 38, 601-608.
63. Sloan, L. L. (1977). Reading aids for the partially sighted: A systematic classification and procedure for prescribing. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
64. Sloan, L. L., & Brown, D. J. (1963). Reading cards for selection of optical aids for the partially sighted. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 55, 1187-1199.
65. Solomon, J. A., & Pelli, D. G. (1994). The visual filter mediating letter identification. Nature, 369, 395-397.
66. Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
67. Ullman, B. L. (1960). The origin and development of humanistic script. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
68. Updike, D. (1937). Printing types: Their history, forms, and use (vol. I). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Vervliet, H. D. L. (2008). The palaeotypography of the French renaissance. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
70. Vervliet, H. D. L. (2010). French renaissance printing types: A conspectus. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press.
71. Wade, N. J. (2007). Image, eye, and retina (invited review). Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 24, 1229-1249.
72. Whittaker, S. G., & Lovie-Kitchin, J. (1993). Visual requirements for reading. Optometry and Vision Science, 70, 54-65.
73. WHO (2004). Fact sheet: Vision 2020: The right to sight, the global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness. Downloaded from http://vision2020.org
74. WHO (2006). Sight test and glasses could dramatically improve the lives of 150 million people with poor vision. Downloaded from http://vision2020.org
75. Williamson, H. (1966). Methods of book design. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76. Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
77. Yu, D., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. (2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7(2):2, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/2/2, doi:10.1167/ 7.2.2.
78. Yu, D., Park, H., Gerold, D., & Legge, G. E. (2010). Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. Journal of Vision, 10(2):21, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/2/21, doi:10.1167/10.2.21.