Non-fragile observer-based H∞ control for neutral stochastic hybrid systems with time-varying delay

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1149-1158

  Chen, Guici ^a,b   Shen, Yi ^b   Zhu, Song ^b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Linear matrix inequality (LMI); Non fragile observer based; Robust H control; Stochastic hybrid system; Time delay system

Indexed keywords

CONTROL PROBLEMS; DELAY-DEPENDENT; LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONALS; MEAN SQUARE; NON-FRAGILE; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; PERFORMANCE LEVEL; ROBUST H; STOCHASTIC HYBRID SYSTEMS; SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS; TIME VARYING; TIME-DELAY SYSTEMS; TIME-VARYING DELAY;

CONTROLLERS; DELAY CONTROL SYSTEMS; HYBRID COMPUTERS; HYBRID SENSORS; HYBRID SYSTEMS; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES; NUMERICAL METHODS; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TIME DELAY;

TIME VARYING CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 80054110669     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-010-0471-8     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zeng ZG, Wang J, Liao XX (2003) Global exponential stability of general class of recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 50(10): 1353-1358.
2. Zeng ZG, Wang J (2006) Improved conditions for global exponential stability of recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17(3): 623-635.
3. Zeng ZG, Wang J, Liao XX (2005) Global asymptotic stability and global exponential stability of neural networks with unbounded time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs 52(1): 168-173.
4. Liao XX, Wang J, Zeng ZG (2005) Global asymptotic stability and global exponential stability of delayed cellular neural networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs 52(7): 403-409.
5. Zeng ZG, Wang J, Liao XX (2004) Stability analysis of delay cellular neural networks described using cloning templates. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 50(11): 1313-1324.
6. ∞. SIAM J Control Optim 36(5): 1504-1538.
7. ∞-type control for discrete-time stochastic systems. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 9(13): 923-948.
8. ∞ control for uncertain stochastic systems with state delay. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(12): 2089-2094.
9. ∞ control for stochastic Markovian jump systems. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 10(9): 1201-1210.
10. ∞ control of uncertain neutral stochastic time-delay systems. J Math Anal Appl 314(1): 1-16.
11. Xu SY, Chen TW (2004) Output feedback control for uncertain stochastic systems with time-varying delays. Automatica 40(12): 2091-2098.
12. ∞ filtering for stochastic systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(12): 2998-3007.
13. ∞ control for stochastic time-delay systems with Markovian switching. Chaos Solitons Fractals 35(3): 442-451.
14. Brayton RK (1966) Bifurcation of periodic solutions in a nonlinear difference-differential equation of neutra type. Q Appl Math 24(3): 215-224.
15. Kuang Y (1993) Delay differential equations with applications in population dynamics. Mathematics in science and engineering, 191. Academic Press, SanDiego.
16. Kolmanovskii VB, Myshkis AD (1992) Applied theory of functional differential equations. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
17. Kolmanovskii VB, Myshkis AD (1999) Introduction to the theory and applications of functional differential equations. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
18. Keel LH, Bhattacharyya SP (1997) Robust, fragile, or optimal? IEEE Trans Autom Control 42(8): 1098-1105.
19. Dorato P (1998) Non-fragile controller design, an overview. In: Proceedings of the 1998 American control reference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp 2829-2831.
20. ∞ control for linear systems with multiplicative controller gain variations. Automatica 37(5): 727-737.
21. ∞ vehicle suspension control using genetic algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16(7-8): 667-680.
22. ∞ non-fragile observer-based controls of dynamical systems via LMI optimization approach. Chaos Solitons Fractals 34(2): 428-436.
23. Lien CH, Cheng WC, Tsai CH, Yu KW (2007) Non-fragile observer-based controls of linear system via LMI approach. Chaos Solitons Fractals 32(4): 1530-1537.
24. ∞ observer-based control for continuous time-delay systems. Inf Sci 178(21): 4699-4706.
25. ∞ control for uncertain stochastic time-delay systems via non-fragile controllers. Asian J Control 8(2): 199-200.
26. ∞ control for a class of uncertain hybrid linear systems with Markovian jumping parameters. In: Proceedings of the 5th world congress on intelligent control and automation, June 15-19, Hangzhou, China, pp 1099-1103.
27. ∞ control for uncertain time delayed stochastic systems with sector constraints. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on control and automation, Guangzhou, China, pp 1852-1856.
28. Trinh H, Fernando T, Nahavandi S (2006) Partial-state observers for nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 51(11): 1808-1812.
29. Busawon KK, Saif M (1999) A state observer for nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 44(11): 2098-2103.
30. Gu DW, Poon FW (2001) A robust state observer scheme. IEEE Trans Autom Control 46(12): 1958-1963.
31. Lien CH (2004) Robust observer-based control of systems with state perturbations via LMI approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(12): 1365-1370.
32. ∞ observer-based controls for a class of uncertain neutral time-delay systems. J Optim Theory Appl 127(1): 129-144.
33. ∞ observer-based control for uncertain neutral systems via LMI approach. J Chin Inst Eng 29(5): 801-811.
34. Gu K (2000) An integral inequality in the stability problem of time-delay systems. In: Proceedings of 39th IEEE conference on decision and control, December 2000, Sydney, Australia, pp 2805-2810.
35. Xie LH (1996) Output feedback H-infinite control of systems with parameter uncertainty. Int J Control 63(4): 741-750.
36. Mao X (1997) Stochastic differential equations and their applications. Horwood Publications, Chichester.