Women have relatively larger brains than men: A comment on the misuse of general linear models in the study of sexual dimorphism

Anatomical Record

Volumn 294, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1856-1863

  Forstmeier, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

2D:4D; Analysis of covariance; Geometric mean regression; Line fitting methods; Model 2 regression; Ratios; Reduced major axis; Standardized major axis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLOMETRY; BODY BUILD; BODY SIZE; BRAIN SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL LINEAR MODEL; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NORMAL HUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RING FINGER MOTIF; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANTHROPOMETRY; BODY SIZE; BRAIN; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ORGAN SIZE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 80054091448     PISSN: 19328486     EISSN: 19328494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.21423     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Ankney CD. 1992. Sex-differences in relative brain size-the mismeasure of woman, too. Intelligence 16: 329-336.
2. Arnold TW, Green AJ. 2007. On the allometric relationship between size and composition of avian eggs: a reassessment. Condor 109: 705-714.
3. Freckleton RP. 2011. Dealing with collinearity in behavioral and ecological data: model averaging and the problems of measurement error. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65: 91-101.
4. Galton F. 1886. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. J Anthropol Inst 15: 246-263.
5. Green AJ. 2001. Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82: 1473-1483.
6. Ho KC, Roessmann U, Straumfjord JV, Monroe G. 1980. Analysis of brain-weight. 2. Adult brain-weight in relation to body height, weight, and surface-area. Arch Pathol Lab Med 104: 640-645.
7. Hönekopp J, Watson S. 2010. Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. Am J Hum Biol 22: 619-630.
8. Kratochvíl L, Flegr J. 2009. Differences in the 2nd to 4th digit length ratio in humans reflect shifts along the common allometric line. Biol Lett 5: 643-646.
9. Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Manning JT. 2002. Digit ratio: a pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
11. Manning JT. 2010. Digit ratio (2D:4D), sex differences, allometry and finger length of 12-30-year olds: evidence from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) internet study. Am J Hum Biol 22: 604-608.
12. McArdle BH. 1988. The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can J Zool 66: 2329-2339.
13. Packard GC, Boardman TJ. 1988. The misuse of ratios, indexes, and percentages in ecophysiological research. Physiol Zool 61: 1-9.
14. Peig J, Green AJ. 2010. The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol 24: 1323-1332.
15. Ranta E, Laurila A, Elmberg J. 1994. Reinventing the wheel-analysis of sexual dimorphism in body-size. Oikos 70: 313-321.
16. Rushton JP, Ankney CD. 1996. Brain size and cognitive ability: correlations with age, sex, social class, and race. Psychon Bull Rev 3: 21-36.
17. Schluter D. 1992. Brain size differences. Nature 359: 181.
18. Smith RJ. 2005. Relative size versus controlling for size-interpretation of ratios in research on sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Curr Anthropol 46: 249-273.
19. Smith RJ. 2009. Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am J Phys Anthropol 140: 476-486.
20. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry. New York: Freeman.
21. Tobler M, Healey M, Olsson M. 2011. Digit ratio, color polymorphism and egg testosterone in the Australian painted dragon. PLoS ONE 6: e16225.
22. Voracek M, Loibl LM. 2009. Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2d:4d) research, 1998-2008. Psychol Reports 104: 922-956.
23. Warton D, Ormerod J. 2007. Smatr: (standardised) major axis estimation and testing routines. R package version 2.1. Available at:.
24. Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81: 259-291.