Shallow heat injection and storage experiment: Heat transport simulation and sensitivity analysis

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 409, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 262-272

  Vandenbohede, Alexander ^a   Hermans, Thomas ^b   Nguyen, Frédéric ^b   Lebbe, Luc ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Collinear diagnostics; Field test; Heat transport; Parameter sensitivity; SEAWAT; Thermal dispersivity

Indexed keywords

COLLINEAR DIAGNOSTICS; DISPERSIVITY; FIELD TEST; HEAT TRANSPORT; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; SEAWAT;

AQUIFERS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; HEAT TRANSFER; HYDROGEOLOGY; POROUS MATERIALS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TESTING;

THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY;

AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION; CONVECTION; DISPERSIVITY; FIELD SURVEY; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HEAT CAPACITY; HEAT TRANSFER; LINEARITY; POROSITY; POROUS MEDIUM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; TRACER;

EID: 80054082223     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson M.P. Heat as a ground water tracer. Ground Water 2005, 43(6):951-968.
2. Anderson M.P., Woessner W.W. Applied Groundwater Modeling 1992, Academic Press, San Diego.
3. Bear J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media 1972, American Elsevier Publishing Company Inc., New York.
4. Belsley D.A. Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression 1990, John Willey and Sons, New York.
5. Blum P., Campillo G., Münch W., Kölbel T. CO2 savings of ground source heat pump systems - a regional analysis. Renewable Energy 2010, 35(1):122-127.
6. Bouwer H., Rice R.C. A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 1976, 12:423-428.
7. Buscheck T.A., Doughty C., Tsang C.F. Prediction and analysis of a field experiment on a multilayered aquifer thermal energy storage system with strong buoyancy flow. Water Resour. Res. 1983, 19(5):1307-1315.
8. Carrera J., Neuman S.P. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions. 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information. Water Resour. Res. 1986, 22(2):199-210.
9. Dausman, A.M., Langevin, C.D., Thorne, D.T., Sukop, M.S., 2009. Application of SEAWAT to Select Variable-density and Viscosity Problems. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5028.
10. deMarsily D. Quantitative Hydrogeology 1986, Academic Press, San Diego, California.
11. Domenico P.A., Schwartz F.W. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York. second ed.
12. Doughty C., Hellstrom G., Tsang C.F., Claesson J. A dimensionless parameter approach to the thermal-behavior of an aquifer thermal-energy storage-system. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18(3):571-587.
13. Ferguson G. Heterogeneity and thermal modeling of ground water. Ground Water 2007, 45(4):485-490.
14. Ferguson G., Woodbury A.D. Subsurface heat flow in an urban environment. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109:B2402.
15. Ferguson G., Woodbury A.D. Thermal sustainability of groundwater-source cooling in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Can. Geotech. J. 2005, 42:1290-1301.
16. Gelhar L.W., Collins M.A. General analysis of longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform flow. Water Resour. Res. 1971, 7(6):1511-1521.
17. Gelhar L.W., Welty C., Rehfeldt K. A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 1992, 28(7):1955-1974.
18. Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., McDonald, M.G., 2000. MODFLOW-2000, The US Geological Survey Modular Ground-water Model: User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-water Process. US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 00-92.
19. Hermans, T., Vandenbohede, A., Nguyen, F. and Lebbe, L., 2010. Monitoring a Shallow Geothermal Experiment in a Sandy Aquifer Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography: A Feasibility Study, EGU General Assembly 2-7 May 2010, Vienna, Austria.
20. Hidalgo J.J., Carrera J., Dentz M. Steady state heat transport in 3D heterogeneous porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32:1206-1212.
21. Hill M.C., Tiedeman C.R. Effective Groundwater Model Calibration with Analysis of Data, Sensitivities, Predictions, and Uncertainty 2007, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
22. Hopmans J.W., Simunek J., Bristow K.L. Indirect estimation of soil thermal properties and water flux using heat pulse probe measurements: geometry and dispersion effects. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38(1):1006.
23. Hutchence K., Weston J.H., Law A.G., Vigrass L.W., Jones F.W. Modeling of a liquid phase geothermal doublet system at Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. Water Resour. Res. 1986, 22:1469-1479.
24. Hyder Z., Butler J.J., McElwee C.D., Liu W. Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30(11):2945-2957.
25. Ingebritsen S.E., Sanford W.E. Groundwater in Geological Processes 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Langevin, C.D., Thorne, D.T., Dausman, A.M., Sukop, M.C., Guo, W., 2007. SEAWAT Version 4: A Computer Program for Simulation of Multi-species Solute and Heat Transport. US Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods, Book 6, US Geological Survey Reston, VA (Chapter A22).
27. Langevin C.D., Dausman A.M., Sukop M.C. Solute and heat transport model of the Henry and Hilleke laboratory experiment. Ground Water 2010, 48(5):757-770.
28. Lebbe L., Mahouden M., De Breuck W. Execution of a triple pumping test and interpretation by an inverse numerical model. Appl. Hydrogeol. 1992, 4:20-34.
29. Lund J.W. Direct utilization of geothermal energy. Energies 2010, 2010(3):1443-1471.
30. Molson J.W., Frind E.O., Palmer C.D. Thermal energy storage in an unconfined aquifer. 2. Model development, validation, and application. Water Resour. Res. 1992, 28(10):2857-2867.
31. Palmer D.P., Blowes D.W., Frind E.O., Molson J.W. Thermal energy storage in an unconfined aquifer. 1. Field injection experiment. Water Resour. Res. 1992, 28(10):2845-2856.
32. Papadopulos S.S., Larson S.P. Aquifer storage of heated water. II. Numerical simulations of field results. Ground Water 1978, 16(4):242-248.
33. Parsons M.L. Groundwater thermal regime in a glacial complex. Water Resour. Res. 1970, 6(6):1701-1720.
34. Rubin Y. Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology 2003, Oxford University Press, New-York.
35. Sauty, J.P., 1977. Contribution à L'identification des Paramètres de Dispersion Dans les Aquifers par Interprétation des Expériences de Traçage. Thèse Doct. Ing., Univ. of Grenobles.
36. Sauty, J.P., Gringarten, A.C., Landel, P.A., 1978. The effect of thermal dispersion on injection of hot water in aquifers. In: Second Invitational Well Testing Symposium. Div. of Geothermal Energy, US Dep. Of Energy, Berkeley, California.
37. Sauty J.P., Gringarten A.C., Fabris H., Thiery D., Menjoz A., Landel P.A. Sensible energy storage in aquifers. 2. Field experiments and comparison with theoretical results. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18(2):253-265.
38. Suzuki S. Percolation measurements based on heat flow through soil with special reference to paddy fields. J. Geophys. Res. 1960, 65(9):2883-2885.
39. Sykes J.F., Lantz R.B., Pahwa S.B., Ward D.S. Numerical simulation of thermal energy storage experiment conducted by Auburn University. Ground Water 1982, 20(5):569-576.
40. Thorne D., Langevin C.D., Sukop M.C. Addition of simultaneous heat and solute transport and variable fluid viscosity to SEAWAT. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32:1758-1768.
41. Tsang C.F., Buscheck T., Doughty C. Aquifer thermal energy storage: a numerical simulation of Auburn University field experiments. Water Resour. Res. 1981, 17(3):647-658.
42. Vandenbohede A., Lebbe L. Parameter estimation based on vertical heat transport in the surficial zone. Hydrol. J. 2010, 18:931-943.
43. Vandenbohede A., Lebbe L. Recharge assessment by means of vertical temperature profiles: analysis of possible influences. J. Hydrol. Sci. 2010, 55(5):792-804.
44. Vandenbohede A., Louwyck A., Lebbe L. Conservative solute versus heat transport in porous media during push-pull tests. Transp. Porous Med. 2009, 76:265-287.
45. Voss, C.I., 1984. A Finite-element Simulation Model for Saturated-Unsaturated, Fluid-Density-Dependent Ground-water Flow with Energy Transport or Chemically-Reactive Single-species Solute Transport. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 84-4369.
46. Voss, C.I., Provost, A.M., 2008. SUTRA: A Model for Saturated-Unsaturated, Variable-density Ground-water Flow with Solute or Energy Transport. Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4231.
47. Wang, H.F., Anderson, M.P., 1982. Introduction to Groundwater Modeling. Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods. Freeman, San Francisco.
48. Zheng, C., Wang, P.P., 1999. MT3DMS, A Modular Three-dimensional Multispecies Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems: Documentation and User's Guide. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Contract Report SERDP-99-1. USAERDC, Vicksburg, MI.