Challenges and considerations of analog front-ends design for portableultrasound systems

Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 310-313

  Xu, Xiaochen ^a   Venkataraman, Harish ^a   Oswal, Sandeep ^a   Bartolome, Eduardo ^a   Vasanth, Karthik ^a  

^a TEXAS INSTRUMENTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOG FRONT-END; COMPACT SIZE; LOW NOISE; LOW POWER; POINT OF CARE; PORTABLE ULTRASOUND; REDUCING SYSTEMS; SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY; SIZE REDUCTIONS; STANDARD TEST PROCEDURES; SYSTEM SENSITIVITY; ULTRASOUND SYSTEM; CMOS PROCESSS; DRIVING FORCES; SILICON PROCESS;

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURE; TESTING; ULTRASONIC EQUIPMENT; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; DESIGN;

ULTRASONICS;

EID: 80054080149     PISSN: 10510117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.5935843     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. Rick Jordanger, A Comparison of LinBiCMOS and CMOS Process Technology inLVDS Integrated Circuits, Application Report, SLLA065, Texas Instruments, 2000.
2. Adam H. Pawlikiewicz and David Hess, Choosing RF CMOS or SiGe BiCMOS inmixed-signal design, www.rfdesign.com, 2006
3. R.Morase and D.H. Evans Compensation for phase and amplitude imbanlancein Quarature Doppler signals, Ultrasound Med Biol., vol. 22, pp129-137, 1996.