Towards quality driven exploration of model transformation spaces

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6981 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 2-16

  Drago, Mauro Luigi ^a   Ghezzi, Carlo ^a   Mirandola, Raffaela ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Feedback Provisioning; Model Transformations

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMIZABLE; ENGINEERING FIELDS; MODEL DRIVEN APPROACH; MODEL TRANSFORMATION; MODEL TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE; MODEL TRANSFORMATIONS; MODEL-DRIVEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; MULTI-MODELING; NON FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; OBJECT-RELATIONAL MAPPING; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; QUALITY PROPERTIES; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SOLUTION SPACE; SYSTEM MODELS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

MODELS;

EID: 80054070382     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24485-8_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Aleti, A., Bjornander, S., Grunske, L., Meedeniya, I.: Archeopterix: An extendable tool for architecture optimization of aadl models. In: MOMPES. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)
2. Alur, D., Crupi, J., Malks, D.: Core J2EE patterns: best practices and design strategies. Sun Microsystems Press (2003)
3. Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: Model-based performance prediction with the palladio component model. In: WOSP. ACM, New York (2007)
4. Bures, T., Carlson, J., Crnkovic, J., Sentilles, S., Vulgarakis, A.: Procom - the progress component model reference manual, version 1.0. Tech. Rep. MHD-MRTC-230/2008-1-SE, Malardalen University (June 2008)
5. Canfora, G., Penta,M.D., Esposito, R.,Villani,M.L.: An approach for qos-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms. In: GECCO. ACM, New York (2005)
6. Ciancone, A., Filieri, A., Drago, M.L., Mirandola, R., Grassi, V.: KlaperSuite: An integrated model-driven environment for reliability and performance analysis of component-based systems. In: Bishop, J., Vallecillo, A. (eds.) TOOLS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6705, pp. 99-114. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
7. Cortellessa, V., Martens, A., Reussner, R., Trubiani, C.: A process to effectively identify "Guilty" performance antipatterns. In: Rosenblum, D.S., Taentzer, G. (eds.) FASE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6013, pp. 368-382. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
8. Drago, M.L., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R.: A quality driven extension to the qvtrelations transformation language. In: CSRD. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) (submitted to), http://home.dei.polimi.it/drago/qvtrr.pdf
9. Insfrán, E., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., Abrahão, S.: Design guidelines for the development of quality-driven model transformations. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 288-302. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
10. Jackson, E.K., Kang, E., Dahlweid, M., Seifert, D., Santen, T.: Components, platforms and possibilities: Towards generic automation for mda. In: EMSOFT. ACM, New York (2010)
11. Kurtev, I.: Adaptability of Model Transformations. Ph.D. thesis, Unversity of Twente, Twente, Netherlands (2005)
12. Lau, S.Q., Czarnecki, K.: Domain Analysis of E-Commerce Systems Using Feature-Based Model Templates. Master's thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada (2006)
13. Lazowska, E.D., Zahorjan, J., Graham, G.S., Sevcik, K.C.: Quantitative System Performance: Computer System Analysis Using Queueing Network Models. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)
14. Martens, A., Koziolek, H., Becker, S., Reussner, R.: Automatically improve software architecture models for performance, reliability, and cost using evolutionary algorithms. In: WOSP/SIPEW (2010)
15. McGregor, J.D., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Bianco, P., Klein, M.: Using arche in the classroom: One experience. Tech. Rep. SEI-2007-TN-001, CMU (2007)
16. Merilinna, J.: A Tool for Quality-Driven Architecture Model Transformation. Ph.D. thesis, VVT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Vuorimiehentie, Finland (2005)
17. Neema, S., Sztipanovits, J., Karsai, G., Butts, K.: Constraint-based design-space exploration and model synthesis. In: Alur, R., Lee, I. (eds.) EMSOFT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2855, pp. 290-305. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
18. Object Management Group (OMG): Mof qvt specification 1.0 (April 2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.0
19. Parsons, T.: A framework for detecting performance design and deployment antipatterns in component based enterprise systems. In: DSM. ACM, New York (2005)
20. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
21. Saxena, T., Karsai, G.: MDE-based approach for generalizing design space exploration. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6394, pp. 46-60. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
22. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance solutions: a practical guide to creating responsive, scalable software. Addison Wesley, Reading (2002)
23. Woodside, M., Petriu, D.C., Petriu, D.B., Shen, H., Israr, T., Merseguer, J.: Performance by unified model analysis (puma). In: WOSP. ACM, New York (2005)
24. Xu, J.: Rule-based automatic software performance diagnosis and improvement. In: WOSP. ACM, New York (2008)