Corrosion assessment method validation for high-grade line pipe

Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference, IPC

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages 385-394

  Besel, Michael ^a   Zimmermann, Steffen ^a   Kalwa, Christoph ^b   Köppe, Theo ^b   Liessem, Andreas ^b  

^a SALZGITTER MANNESMANN FORSCHUNG GMBH   (Germany)

^b Europipe GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Burst test; Corrosion assessment method; Corrosion defect; Finite element simulation; High grade line pipe; Von Mises criterion

Indexed keywords

BURST TESTS; CORROSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; CORROSION DEFECT; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION; LINE PIPES; VON MISES CRITERION;

CORROSION RATE; DEFECTS; PLASTIC FLOW; PRESSURE EFFECTS; STEEL PIPE;

OFFSHORE PIPELINES;

EID: 80054037254     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/IPC2010-31664     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cosham, A., Hopkins, P., Macdonald, K.A.: Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines - corrosion. Engineering Failure Analysis, 14, 2007, pp. 1245-1265. (Pubitemid 46682013)
2. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, ASME B31G, 1991.
3. Kiefner, J.H., Vieth, P.H.: A modified criterion for evaluating the strength of corroded pipe, Final Report for Project PR 3-805 to the Pipeline Supervisory Committee of the American Gas Association, Batelle (OH); 1989.
4. Det Norske Veritas: Recommended Practice DNV-RPF101 - Corroded Pipelines, October 2004.
5. Tanguy, B., Luu, T.T., Perrin, G., Pineau, A.; Besson, J. : Plastic and damage behaviour of a high strength X100 pipeline steel: Experiments and modelling. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 85, 2008. pp. 322-335.
6. Chiodo, M.S.G., Ruggieri, C.: Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stressbased criteria: Numerical studies and verification analyses. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 86, 2009. pp. 164-176.
7. Bueno, S.I.O., Benjamin, A.C., Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., Rosas, M.A.P.: Burst tests on pipeline containing corrosion in the seam weld. Proc. of the Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, June 21-26, 2009. pp. 506-513.
8. British Standard Institution, BS 7910:1999: Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.
9. Batte, A.D.; Fu, B.; Kirkwood, M.G., Vu, D.: Advanced methods for integrity assessment of corroded pipelines. Pipes and Pipelines International, 42 (1), 1997, pp. 5-11. (Pubitemid 127634713)
10. th offshore mechanics and arctic engineering conference, Yokohama, Japan, 13-17 April 1997. New York: ASME. Vol. 5, pp. 221-228.
11. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids, ASME B31.4, 2002.
12. Zhu, X.K.; Leis, B.: Accurate prediction of burst pressure for linepipes. The Journal of Pipeline Integrity 3, 2004, pp. 195-206.
13. Staat, M.: Local and global collaps pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 82, 2005, pp. 217-225. (Pubitemid 40077394)
14. Faupel, J.H.: Yield and bursting characteristics of heavy-walled cylinders. Journal of Applied Mechanics 78, 1956, pp. 1031-1064.
15. Moser, A.P.: Buried Pipe Design (2nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, 2001.