Key Stages and Considerations When Undertaking a Systematic Review: Bladder Training for the Management of Urinary Incontinence

Reviewing Research Evidence for Nursing Practice: Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 9-22

  Roe, Brenda ^a,b  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Queen's Nursing Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bladder training; Cochrane; MeSH; Symptom classification; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054032085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470692127.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. CRD (2001) Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD Report 4 (2nd edition). Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/isnt/crd/report4.htm (accessed 5 April 2006).
2. CRD (2006) What is a systematic review and how is it different from a literature review? Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/faq1.htm (accessed 5 April 2006).
3. Crown, S. & Crisp, A.H. (1979) Crown-Crisp Experiential Index. Hodder and Stoughton Educational, London.
4. Deeks, J.J. & Altman, D.G. (2005) Effect measures for metaanalysis of trials with binary outcomes. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-Analysis in Context (Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G., eds), pp. 313-35. BMJ Publishing. London.
5. Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G. & Bradburn, M.J. (2005) Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-Analysis in Context (Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G., eds), pp. 285-312. BMJ Publishing, London.
6. Egger, M. & Davey Smith, G. (2005) Principles and procedures for systematic reviews. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-Analysis in Context (Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G., eds), pp. 23-42. BMJ Publishing, London.
7. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G. (eds) (2005) Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-Analysis in Context. BMJ Publishing, London.
8. Glanville, J.M., Lefebvre, C., Miles, J.N. & Camosso-Stefinovic, J. (2006) How to identify randomised controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94 (2), 130-6 (erratum: Figure 2 (p. 135) should be replaced by figure in erratum Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(3), 354).
9. Glasziou, P., Irwig, L., Bain, C. & Colditz, G. (2001) Systematic Reviews in Health Care. A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Grant, A.M., Cody, D.J., Glazener, C.M.A., et al. (eds) (2006a) Incontinence Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)) 2000, Issue 4. http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clabout/articles/INCONT/frame.hml (accessed 2 May 2006).
11. Grant, A.M., Cody, D.J., Glazener, C.M.A., et al. (eds) (2006b) Additional Information. Assessment of Quality of Trial Methodology for the Cochrane Incontinence Group. Incontinence Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)) 2000, Issue 4. http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clabout/articles/INCONT/frame.html (accessed 26 April 2006).
12. Green, S. & Higgins, J. (eds) (2005) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5. (updated May 2005). http://www.cochrane.dk/cochrane/handbook/handbook.htm (accessed 26 April 2006).
13. Lefebvre, C. & Clarke, M.J. (2005) Identifying randomised controlled trials. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-Analysis in Context (Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G. eds), pp. 69-86. BMJ Publishing, London.
14. Lose, G., Fantl, J.A., Victor, A., et al. (1998) Outcome measures for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 17, 255-62.
15. Peters, D. & Ceci, S. (1982) Peer-review practices of psychological journals. The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-225.
16. Roe, B., Williams, K. & Palmer, M. (1997) Bladder Training for the Treatment of Urinary Urge Incontinence (Protocol). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Update Software, Oxford.
17. Roe, B., Williams, K. & Palmer, M. (1998) Bladder Training for the Treatment of Urinary Urge Incontinence (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Update Software, Oxford.
18. Roe, B., Williams, K. & Palmer, M. (2000) Bladder Training for the Treatment of Urinary Urge Incontinence (Cochrane Review Update). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Update Software, Oxford.
19. Sandvik, H., Hunskaar, S., Seim, A., Hermstead, R., Vanik, A. & Bratt, H. (1993) Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 47, 497-9.
20. Shumaker, S.A., Wyman, J.F., Uebersax, J.S., McClish, D. & Fantl, J.A. (1994) Health related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Quality of Life Research, 3, 291-306.
21. Sindhu, F. (1998) Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of the literature. In: Research and Development in Clinical Nursing Practice (Roe, B. & Webb, C., eds), pp. 84-111. Whurr Publishers, London.
22. Smith, B.J., Darzins, P.J., Quinn, M. & Heller, R.F. (1992) Modern methods of searching the medical literature. Medical Journal of Australia, 157, 603-11.
23. Thompson, S.G. (2005) Why and how sources of heterogeneity should be investigated. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context (Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G., eds), pp. 157-75. BMJ Publishing, London.
24. Wallace, S., Roe, B., Williams, K. & Palmer, M. (2004) Bladder Training for Urinary Incontinence in Adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
25. Ware, J.E. (1993) Measuring patients' view: the optimum outcome measure. SF36: a valid, reliable assessment of health from the patient's point of view. British Medical Journal, 306, 1429-30.