Accounting foundations for interregional commodity-by-industry input-output models

Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 187-196

  Jackson, Randall W ^a   Schwarm, Walter R ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b California Department of Finance   (United States)

Author keywords

Commodity by industry; Input output; Interregional

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054018511     PISSN: 18644031     EISSN: 1864404X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12076-011-0066-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Canning, P., Wang, Z.: A flexible mathematical programming model to estimate interregional input-output accounts. J. Reg. Sci. 45, 539-563 (2005).
2. Chenery, H. B.: Regional analysis. In Chenery, H. B., Clark, P. G., Pinna, V. C. (eds.) The Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy, pp. 97-129. US Mutual Security Agency, Rome (1953).
3. de Mesnard, L.: Understanding the shortcomings of commodity-based technology in input-output models: An economic-circuit approach. J. Reg. Sci. 44, 125-141 (2004).
4. Dietzenbacher, E., Albino, V., Kuhtz, S.: The fallacy of using US-type input-output tables. In: 15th International Input-Output Association Conference, Beijing, China (2005).
5. Isard, W.: Interregional and regional input-output analysis: A model of a space economy. Rev. Econ. Stat. 33, 318-328 (1951).
6. Jackson, R. W.: Regionalizing national commodity-by-industry accounts. Econ. Syst. Res. 10(3), 223-238 (1998).
7. Jackson, R. W., Schwarm, W. R., Okuyama, Y., Islam, S.: A method for constructing commodity-by-industry flow matrices. Ann. Reg. Sci. 40, 909-920 (2006).
8. Hoffman, R. B., Kent, J. N.: Design for commodity-by-industry interregional input-output models. In: Polenske, K. R., Skolka, J. (eds.) Advances in Input-Output Analysis: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Vienna, April 22-26, 1974, pp. 251-262. Ballinger, Cambridge (1976).
9. Kuehn, J. A., Procter, M. H., Braschler, C. H.: Comparisons of multipliers from input-output and economic base models. Land Econ. 61, 129-135 (1985).
10. Lahr, M. L.: Reconciling domestication techniques, the notion of re-exports and some comments on regional accounting. Econ. Syst. Res. 13, 165-179 (2001).
11. Lindall, S., Olsen, D., Alward, G.: Deriving multi-regional models using the IMPLAN national trade flows model. J. Reg. Anal. Policy 36, 76-83 (2006).
12. Miller, R. E., Blair, P. D.: Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985).
13. Miller, R. E., Blair, P. D.: Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
14. Moses, L. N.: The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 45, 803-832 (1955).
15. Oosterhaven, J.: A family of square and rectangular interregional input-output models. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 14, 562-582 (1984).
16. Robinson, D. P., Liu, Z.: The effects of interregional trade flow estimating procedures on multiregional social accounting matrix multipliers. J. Reg. Anal. Policy 36, 94-104 (2006).
17. Schwarm, W. R., Jackson, R. W., Okuyama, Y.: An evaluation of method for constructing commodity-by-industry flow matrices. J. Reg. Anal. Policy 36, 84-93 (2006).
18. Stevens, B. H., Treyz, G. I., Ehrlich, D. J., Bower, J. R.: A new technique for the construction of non-survey regional input-output models and comparison with two survey-based models. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 8, 271-286 (1983).
19. Stevens, B. H., Treyz, G., Lahr, M.: On the Comparative Accuracy of RPC Estimating Techniques. Regional Science Research Institute, Peace Dale (1988).
20. U. S. Department of Commerce. U. S. Benchmark Input-Output Accounts, 2002. Washington DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce (2007).
21. West, G. R.: Regional trade estimation-a hybrid approach. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 13, 103-118 (1990).