Protective measures and vulnerability indices for the enhanced critical infrastructure protection programme

International Journal of Critical Infrastructures

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 200-219

  Petit, Frédéric ^a   Buehring, William ^a   Whitfield, Ronald ^a   Fisher, Ronald ^a   Collins, Michael ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructure; Critical infrastructure protection; Mitigation security management; Protective measure; Risk management; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

NATIONAL SECURITY; PUBLIC WORKS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION; INFORMATION SHARING; PROTECTIVE MEASURES; SECURITY MANAGEMENT; US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; VULNERABILITY INDEX;

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES;

EID: 80053997378     PISSN: 14753219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJCIS.2011.042976     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. DHS (US Department of Homeland Security) (2009) 'National Infrastructure Protection Plan: partnering to enhance protection and resiliency', Washington, DC, available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NIPP-Plan.pdf (accessed on 13 August 2010).
2. DHS (US Department of Homeland Security) (2007) 'Protective Security Advisors - securing the nation's critical infrastructure one community at a time', Office of Infrastructure Protection, Protective Security Coordination Division, Washington, DC, available at http://safetyservices.ucdavis.edu/ emergency-management/dru-1/iaem-uccdocuments/ PSA%20brochure.pdf (accessed on 13 August 2010).
3. Ezell, B.C. (2007) 'Infrastructure vulnerability assessment model (I-VAM)', Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.571-583. (Pubitemid 47063173)
4. Haimes, Y.Y. (2006) 'On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risk to infrastructure', Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.293-296.
5. Keeney, R.L. (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-making, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
6. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
7. LLC (2006) 'RAMCAP, the framework', available at https://www.navi-online. nl/services/Proxy/kennisbank/id/56 (accessed on 13 August 2010).
8. Snyder, J.L. (2009) 'The Mumbai attacks: a wake-up call for America', Testimony of James L. Snyder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection, National Protection and Programs Directorate, before the House Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee on Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection, 11 March, available at http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/ testimony/testimony-1237299957226.shtm (accessed on 13 August 2010).
9. US Government Accountability Office (2007) 'Homeland security: applying risk management principles to guide federal investments', Testimony before the Subcommittee on Homeland Security, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives.
10. US Government Accountability Office (2008a) 'Risk management: strengthening the use of risk management principles in homeland security', Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection, Homeland Security Committee, House of Representatives.
11. US Government Accountability Office (2008b) Homeland Security: DHS Risk Based Grant Methodology is Reasonable but Current Version's Measure of Vulnerability is Limited, Report to Congressional Committees.