Using induced rules as complex features in memory-based language learning

Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL 2000 and of the 2nd Learning Language in Logic Workshop, LLL 2000 - Held in cooperation with ICGI 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 73-78

  van den Bosch, Antal ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK DATASETS; BINARY FEATURES; LANGUAGE LEARNING; MATCHING RULES; MEMORY-BASED LEARNING; MULTI-VALUED; RULE BASED; RULE INDUCTION ALGORITHMS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053992589     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. D.W. Aha, D. Kibler, and M. Albert. 1991. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6:37-66.
2. C.L. Blake and C.J. Merz. 1998. UCI repository of machine learning databases.
3. Thorsten Brants. 2000. TnT - a statistical part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Sixth Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP-2000), Seattle, WA.
4. E. Brill. 1993. A Corpus-Based Approach to Language Learning. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
5. P. Clark and T. Niblett. 1989. The CN2 rule induction algorithm. Machine Learning, 3:261-284.
6. W. W. Cohen. 1995. Fast effective rule induction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, Lake Tahoe, California.
7. M.J Collins and J. Brooks. 1995. Prepositional phrase attachment through a backed-off model. In Proc. of Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Cambridge.
8. W. Daelemans and A. Van den Bosch. 1992. Generalisation performance of backpropagation learning on a syllabification task. In M. F. J. Drossaers and A. Nijholt, editors, Proc. of TWLT3: Connectionism and Natural Language Processing, pages 27-37, Enschede. Twente University.
9. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, P. Berck, and S. Gillis. 1996. MBT: A memory-based part of speech tagger generator. In E. Ejerhed and I. Dagan, editors, Proc. of Fourth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 14-27. ACL SIGDAT.
10. W. Daelemans, P. Berck, and S. Gillis. 1997a. Data mining as a method for linguistic analysis: Dutch diminutives. Folia Linguistica, XXXI(1-2).
11. W. Daelemans, A. Van den Bosch, and A. Weijters. 1997b. IGTree: using trees for compression and classification in lazy learning algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11:407-423.
12. W. Daelemans, A. Van den Bosch, and J. Zavrel. 1999. Forgetting exceptions is harmful in language learning. Machine Learning, 34(1-3): 11-43.
13. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2000. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 3.0, reference manual. Technical Report ILK-0001, ILK, Tilburg University.
14. P. Domingos. 1995. The rise 2.0 system: A case study in multistrategy learning. Technical Report 95-2, University of California at Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA.
15. P. Domingos. 1996. Unifying instance-based and rule-based induction. Machine Learning, 24:141-168.
16. J.R. Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
17. L.A. Ramshaw and M.P. Marcus. 1995. Text chunking using transformation-based learning. In Proc. of Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 82-94, June.
18. A. Ratnaparkhi, J. Reynar, and S. Roukos. 1994. A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment. In Workshop on Human Language Technology, Plainsboro, NJ, March. ARPA.
19. A. Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A linear observed time statistical parser based on maximum entropy models. Technical Report cmp-lg/9706014, Computation and Language, http://xxx.lanl.gov/list/cmp-lg/, June.
20. D. Roth. 1998. Learning to resolve natural language ambiguities: A unified approach. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 898-904.
21. A. Van den Bosch. 1997. Learning to pronounce written words: A study in inductive language learning. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Maastricht.
22. A. Van den Bosch. 1999a. Careful abstraction from instance families in memory-based language learning. Journal for Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 11(3):339-368.
23. A. Van den Bosch. 1999b. Instance-family abstraction in memory-based language learning. In I. Bratko and S. Dzeroski, editors, Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference, pages 39-48, Bled, Slovenia.
24. J. Veenstra. 1998. Fast NP chunking using memory-based learning techniques. In Proceedings of BENELEARN'98, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
25. S. Weiss and C. Kulikowski. 1991. Computer systems that learn. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
26. J. Zavrel, W. Daelemans, and J. Veenstra. 1997. Resolving PP attachment ambiguities with memory-based learning. In M. Ellison, editor, Proc. of the Workshop on Computational Language Learning (CoNLL'97), ACL, Madrid.