A modeling study of the effect of reactor configuration on the cycle length of heavy oil fixed-bed hydroprocessing

Fuel

Volumn 90, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3551-3560

  Alvarez, Anton ^a   Ancheyta, Jorge ^a,b   Centeno, Guillermo ^a   Marroquín, Gustavo ^a  

^a INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL PETRÓLEO   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Catalyst deactivation; Fixed bed reactor; Modeling; Residue hydroprocessing

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS; BENCH-SCALE TEST; CATALYST AGING; COMPLEX CONFIGURATION; CYCLE LENGTH; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FIXED-BED; FIXED-BED REACTORS; HEAVY OIL; HEAVY OIL HYDROPROCESSING; HYDROPROCESSING; MODELING STUDIES; REACTION TEMPERATURE; REACTOR CONFIGURATION; REACTOR DESIGNS; REACTOR PERFORMANCE; RESIDUE HYDROPROCESSING; RUN LENGTH; TEMPERATURE PROFILES; TEMPERATURE RISE; TIME VARYING;

CATALYST ACTIVITY; CATALYST POISONING; CHEMICAL REACTORS; HEAVY OIL PRODUCTION;

HYDROCRACKING;

EID: 80053990231     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.043     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P.R. Robinson, and G.E. Dolbear Hydrotreating and hydrocracking: fundamentals C.S. Hsu, P.R. Robinson, Practical advances in petroleum processing vol. 1 2006 Springer New York
2. T.Y. Yan Can J Chem Eng 58 1980 259 266
3. E. Furimsky, and F.E. Massoth Catal Today 52 1999 381 495
4. C.N. Satterfield AIChE J 21 1975 209 228
5. S.T. Sie Appl Catal A 212 2001 129 151
6. Y.T. Shah, R.D. Mhaskar, and J. Paraskos Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 15 1976 400 406
7. E.K.T. Kam, M. Al-Shamali, M. Juraidan, and H. Qabazard Energy Fuels 19 2005 753 764
8. E. Furimsky Appl Catal A 171 1998 177 206
9. R.D. Mhaskar, Y.T. Shah, and J.A. Paraskos Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 17 1978 27 33
10. Ancheyta J, Betancourt G, Marroquín G, Centeno G, Muñoz JAD, Alonso F. US patent 7651,604 B2 January; 2010.
11. A. Alvarez, and J. Ancheyta Appl Catal A 351 2008 148 158
12. A. Marafi, F. Maruyama, A. Stanislaus, A. Stanislaus, and E. Kam Ind Eng Chem Res 47 2008 724 741
13. H. Korsten, and U. Hoffmann AIChE J 42 1996 1350 1360
14. H.M.S. Lababidi, H.I. Shaban, S. Al-Radwan, and E. Alper Chem Eng Technol 21 1998 193 200
15. Y.T. Shah, and J.A. Paraskos Chem Eng Sci 30 1975 1169 1176
16. W. Döhler, and M. Rupp Chem Eng Technol 10 1987 349 352
17. S. Sánchez, M.A. Rodríguez, and J. Ancheyta Ind Eng Chem Res 44 2005 9409 9413
18. S.K. Bej Energy Fuels 16 2002 774 784
19. Al-Dahhan MH. Recent advances and scale-up of trickle bed reactors for energy and environmental applications. In: Proc international symposium on advances in hydroprocessing of oil fractions, Morelia (Mexico); June 26-29, 2007.
20. M.H. Al-Dahhan, and M.P. Dudukovic AIChE J 42 1996 2594 2606
21. Sie ST. Revue de L'Institute Francais du Pétrole 1999;46:501-15.
22. F.S. Mederos, J. Ancheyta, and J. Chen Appl Catal A 355 2009 1 19
23. Bondi A. Chem Technol 1971;185-8.
24. J. Ancheyta, G. Betancourt, G. Centeno, G. Marroquín, F. Alonso, and E. Garciafigueroa Energy Fuels 16 2002 1438 1443
25. J. Ancheyta, G. Betancourt, G. Centeno, and G. Marroquín Energy Fuels 17 2002 462 467
26. S. Kodama, H. Nitta, T. Takatsuka, and T. Yokoyama J Jpn Petrol Inst 23 1980 310 320
27. H. Toulhoat, D. Hudebine, P. Raybaud, D. Guillaume, and S. Kressmann Catal Today 109 2005 135 153
28. G.F. Froment, and K.B. Bischoff Chemical reactor analysis and design 1979 John Wiley & Sons New York
29. Centeno G. Catalyst deactivation during hydroprocessing of heavy oils. Ph.D. dissertation, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Madero, Mexico; 2008.
30. A. Alvarez, J. Ancheyta, and J.A.D. Muñoz Appl Catal A 361 2009 1 12