Candidate document retrieval for web-scale text reuse detection

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7024 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 356-367

  Hagen, Matthias ^a   Stein, Benno ^a  

^a BAUHAUS UNIVERSITY WEIMAR   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DETECTION PROCESS; DETECTION SYSTEM; DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; QUERY FORMULATION; WEB DOCUMENT;

USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 80053979755     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24583-1_35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: Proc. of VLDB 1994, pp. 487-499 (1994)
2. Bar-Yossef, Z., Gurevich, M.: Random sampling from a search engine's index. JACM 55(5) (2008)
3. Barker, K., Cornacchia, N.: Using noun phrase heads to extract document keyphrases. In: Proc. AI 2000, pp. 40-52 (2000)
4. Bendersky, M., Croft, W.B.: Finding text reuse on the web. In: Proc. of WSDM 2009, pp. 262-271 (2009)
5. Brants, T., Franz, A.: Web 1T 5-gram Version 1. LDC2006T13 (2006)
6. Carmel, D., Yom-Tov, E., Darlow, A., Pelleg, D.:What makes a query difficult? In: Proc. of SIGIR 2006, pp. 390-397 (2006)
7. Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y., Croft, W.B.: Predicting query performance. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2002, pp. 299-306 (2002)
8. Dasdan, A., D'Alberto, P., Kolay, S., Drome, C.: Automatic retrieval of similar content using search engine query interface. In: Proc. of CIKM 2009, pp. 701-710 (2009)
9. Grozea, C., Gehl, C., Popescu, M.: ENCOPLOT: Pairwise Sequence Matching in Linear Time Applied to Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of PAN 2009, pp. 10-18 (2009)
10. Hagen, M., Stein, B.M.: Capacity-constrained query formulation. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds.) ECDL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6273, pp. 384-388. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
11. Hauff, C., Hiemstra, D., de Jong, F.: A survey of pre-retrieval query performance predictors. In: Proc. of CIKM 2008, pp. 1419-1420 (2008)
12. He, B., Ounis, I.: Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In: Apostolico, A., Melucci, M. (eds.) SPIRE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3246, pp. 43-54. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
13. Kasprzak, J., Brandejs, M.: Improving the Reliability of the Plagiarism Detection System: Lab Report for PAN at CLEF 2010. In: Proc. of PAN 2010 (2010)
14. Pôssas, B., Ziviani, N., Ribeiro-Neto, B.A., Meira Jr., W.: Maximal termsets as a query structuring mechanism. In: Proc. of CIKM 2005, pp. 287-288 (2005)
15. Scholer, F., Garcia, S.: A case for improved evaluation of query difficulty prediction. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2009, pp. 640-641 (2009)
16. Seo, J., Croft,W.B.: Local text reuse detection. In: Proc.of SIGIR 2008, pp. 571-578 (2008)
17. Stein, B., Hagen, M.: Introducing the user-over-ranking hypothesis. In: Clough, P., Foley, C., Gurrin, C., Jones, G.J.F., Kraaij, W., Lee, H., Mudoch, V. (eds.) ECIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6611, pp. 503-509. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
18. Wu, X., Kumar, V.: The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
19. Yang, Y., Bansal, N., Dakka, W., Ipeirotis, P.G., Koudas, N., Papadias, D.: Query by document. In: Proc. of WSDM 2009, pp. 34-43 (2009)