A new method to uncover signatures of divergent and stabilizing selection in quantitative traits

Genetics

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 621-632

  Ovaskainen, Otso ^a   Karhunen, Markku ^a   Zheng, Chaozhi ^a,b   Arias, José Manuel Cano ^a   Merilä, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MARKER GENE; MATHEMATICAL GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL POPULATION; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION GENETICS; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 80053965730     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.129387     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, A. D., and B. S. Weir, 2007 A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations. Genetics 176: 421-440
2. Beaumont, M. A., 2008 Selection and sticklebacks. Mol. Ecol. 17: 3425-3427
3. Bell, M. A., and S. A. Foster (Editors), 1994 The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Bink, M., A. D. Anderson, W. E. van de Weg, and E. A. Thompson, 2008 Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117: 843-855
5. Bonin, A., E. Bellemain, P. B. Eidesen, F. Pompanon, C. Brochmann et al., 2004 How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3261-3273
6. Cano, J. M., A. Laurila, J. Palo, and J. Merilä, 2004 Population differentiation in G matrix structure due to natural selection in Rana temporaria. Evolution 58: 2013-2020
7. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows, 2008 Q(st) meets the G matrix: the dimensionality of adaptive divergence in multiple correlated quantitative traits. Evolution 62: 1437-1449
8. Cockerham, C. C., and B. S. Weir, 1987 Correlations, descent measures-drift with migration and mutation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 8512-8514
9. Edelaar, P. I. M., and M. Björklund, 2011 If FST does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with QST is misleading. Or is it? Mol. Ecol. 20: 1805-1812
10. Edwards, S. V., and M. Kot, 1995 Comparative methods at the species level: geographic variation in morphology and group size in grey-crowned babblers (Pomatostomus temporalis). Evolution 49: 1134-1146
11. Fernandez, J., and M. A. Toro, 2006 A new method to estimate relatedness from molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1657-1667
12. Gaggiotti, O. E., and M. Foll, 2010 Quantifying population structure using the F-model. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10: 821-830
13. Goudet, J., and G. Martin, 2007 Under neutrality, Q(ST),= F-ST when there is dominance in an island model. Genetics 176: 1371-1374
14. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel, 1991 The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Hendry, A. P., 2002 Q(ST).=not equal, F-ST? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 502.
16. Hohenlohe, P. A., and S. J. Arnold, 2008 MIPoD: a hypothesistesting framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence. Am. Nat. 171: 366-385
17. Hubbell, S. P., 2001 The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
18. Jost, L., 2008 G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 17: 4015-4026
19. Kitada, S., T. Kitakado, and H. Kishino, 2007 Empirical Bayes inference of pairwise F-sT and its distribution in the genome. Genetics 177: 861-873
20. Kitakado, T., S. Kitada, H. Kishino, and H. J. Skaug, 2006 An integrated-likelihood method for estimating genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 173: 2073-2082
21. Lande, R., 1980 Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. Am. Nat. 116: 463-479
22. Leinonen, T., R. B. O'Hara, J. M. Cano, and J. Merila, 2008 Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1-17
23. Lopez-Fanjul, C., A. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro, 2003 The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence. Genetics 164: 1627-1633
24. Lopez-Fanjul, C., A. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro, 2007 The effect of dominance on the use of the Q(ST)-F-ST contrast to detect natural selection on quantitative traits. Genetics 176: 725-727
25. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
26. Maenhout, S., B. De Baets, and G. Haesaert, 2009 CoCoa: a software tool for estimating the coefficient of coancestry from multilocus genotype data. Bioinformatics 25: 2753-2754
27. Martin, G., E. Chapuis, and J. Goudet, 2008 Multivariate Qst-Fst comparisons: a neutrality test for the evolution of the G matrix in structured populations. Genetics 180: 2135-2149
28. Martins, E. P., 2000 Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 296-299
29. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen, 1997 Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646-667
30. McGuigan, K., 2006 Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics. Mol. Ecol. 15: 883-896
31. McKay, J. K., and R. G. Latta, 2002 Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 285-291
32. Merilä, J., and P. Crnokrak, 2001 Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 892-903
33. O'Hara, R. B., and J. Merilä, 2005 Bias and precision in Q(ST) estimates: problems and some solutions. Genetics 171: 1331-1339.
34. Ohta, T., 2002 Near-neutrality in evolution of genes and gene regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16134-16137
35. Ovaskainen, O., J. M. Cano, and J. Merilä, 2008 A Bayesian framework for comparative quantitative genetics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275: 669-678
36. Phillips, P. C., M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler, 2001 Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158: 1137-1145
37. Rousset, F., 2004 Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
38. Samanta, S., Y. J. Li, and B. S. Weir, 2009 Drawing inferences about the coancestry coefficient. Theor. Popul. Biol. 75: 312-319.
39. Schluter, D., 1996 Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766-1774
40. Sorensen, D., and D. Gianola, 2002 Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
41. Weir, B. S., and W. G. Hill, 2002 Estimating F-statistics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36: 721-750
42. Whitlock, M. C., 1999 Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation. Genet. Res. 74: 215-221
43. Whitlock, M. C., 2008 Evolutionary inference from Q(ST). Mol. Ecol. 17: 1885-1896
44. Whitlock, M. C., and F. Guillaume, 2009 Testing for spatially divergent selection: comparing QST to FST. Genetics 183: 1055-1063.
45. Whitlock, M. C., and P. C. Phillips, 2000 The exquisite corpse: a shifting view of the shifting balance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 347-348
46. Wright, S., 1951 The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15: 323-354.