Investigating the impact of concrete driven piles on the archaeological record using soil micromorphology: Three case studies from the Netherlands

Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 8-30

  Huisman, D J ^a   Müller, Axel ^a   Van Doesburg, Jan ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compression; Deformation; Micromorphology; Netherlands; Piles

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053959579     PISSN: 13505033     EISSN: 17535522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/175355211X13097877338897     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Council of Europe. 1992. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (revisited), European Treaty Series 143.
2. Courty, M.A., Goldberg, P., and Macphail, R., 1989. Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Groenendijk, M. 2009. Archeologievriendelijk bouwen op de Koningshof te Gouda, Een evaluatie van de archeologievriendelijke aanpak. Gouda: Gemeente Gouda.
4. Huisman, D. J. 2007. How Redox-induced Soil Colour Changes Masks Soil Features; Cases from Alluvial Soils in the Netherlands. Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek/Proceedings of the National Service for Archaeological Heritage in the Netherlands, 46: 315-27.
5. Huisman, D. J. ed. 2009. Degradation of Archaeological Remains. Den Haag: SdU.
6. Huisman, D. J., van Doesburg, J., Stöver. J., and Muller, A. 2009a. De (on)mogelijkheden van archeologie vriendelijk bouwen op terpen/wierden. Onderzoek (2007) naar de effecten van heien op de wierden Kenwerd Oldehove en Groot Wetsinge. Rapportage Archeologische Monumentenzorg, 176. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed.
7. Hyde, A. 2004. Damage to Inclusions in Sand Subjected to One Dimensional Compression. In: T. Nixon, ed. Preserving Archaeological Remains In Situ? Proceedings of the 2nd Conference, 12-14 September 2001. London: Museum of London Archaeological Service, pp. 32-39.
8. Konert, M. and Vandenberghe, J. 1996. Comparison of Laser Grain Size Analysis with Pipette and Sieve Analysis: a Solution for the Underestimation of the Clay Fraction. Sedimentology, 44(3): 523-35.
9. Stoops, G. 2003. Guidelines for Analysis and Description of Soil and Regolith Thin Sections. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
10. Van Kappel, K. 2004. Ondergedekt verleden, het effect van kunstmatige ophogingen op archeologische vindplaatsen in het noordelijke mariene gebied in Nederland (unpublished MSc thesis, Wageningen University).
11. Williams, J., Sidell, J., and Panter, I. 2007. Piling and Archaeology. An English Heritage Guidance Note. Swindon: English Heritage.
12. Williams, J., Hird, Ch., Emmet, K., Davies, G., and Rayner, T. 2008a. Understanding Sub-Surface Impact of Driven Piles. In: H. Kars and R. M. van Heeringen, Preserving Archaeological Remains In Situ. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference, 7-9 December 2006, Geoarchaeological and Bioarchaeological Studies, 10: 85-91. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
13. Williams, J., Hunter, R., Branch, N., Swindle, G., Walsh, N., Valcarez, I., Palmer, A., Langdale-Smith, T., and Allen, M. 2008b. Monitoring Leaching Form Cast In Situ Piles. In: H. Kars and R. M. van Heeringen, Preserving Archaeological Remains In Situ. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference, 7-9 December 2006, Geoarchaeological and Bioarchaeological Studies, 10: 175-80. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.