Hierarchical fault diagnosis and fuzzy rule-based reasoning for satellites formation flight

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2435-2456

  Barua, A ^a   Khorasani, K ^a  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE CONTROL SUB-SYSTEM; ELECTRICAL POWER SUBSYSTEMS; FAULT DIAGNOSIS SCHEMES; FORMATION FLYING; GROUND STATIONS; HEALTH MONITORING; HUMAN EXPERT; INTERMITTENT FAULT; LEADER-FOLLOWER ARCHITECTURE; RULE BASED; RULE BASED REASONING; SATELLITE FORMATION FLIGHT; SATELLITES FORMATION; SINGLE PLATFORM; SPACE SCIENCE; TELEMETRY DATA; TREND ANALYSIS;

ATTITUDE CONTROL; EARTH (PLANET); ELECTRIC FAULT CURRENTS; FUZZY RULES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SATELLITES; UNMANNED VEHICLES;

SPACE PLATFORMS;

EID: 80053947471     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2011.6034643     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Clement, B. J. and Barrett, A. C. Coordination challenges for autonomous spacecraft. Presented at the Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Workshop on Multiagent System Problem Spaces (AAMAS-02), Bologna, Italy, June 2002.
2. Earth Observing System CloudSat Mission Webpage, cited: February 2010. [Online], available: Http://cloudsat.atmos.colostate.edu/mission.
3. Concept of Satellite Formation Flying Becoming a Reality NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, cited: February 2010. [Online], available: Http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/20010601eo1.html.
4. Zink, M., et al. The TanDEM-X mission concept. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, July-Aug. 2006, 1938-1941.
5. Gill, E. and Runge, H. Tight formation flying for an along-track SAR interferometer. Acta Astronautica, 55 (2004), 473-485.
6. Belanger, G., et al. Decentralized control of satellite clusters under limited communication. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, Aug. 2002.
7. Precision Formation Flying NASA-JPL, cited: February 2010. [Online], available: Http://dst.jpl.nasa.gov/.
8. Darwin Mission ESA Space Science, cited: February 2010. [Online], available: Http://www.esa.int/science/darwin.
9. Carpenter, K. G., et al. The stellar imager (SI): A revolutionary large-baseline imaging interferometer at the Sun-Earth L2 point. In Proceedings of SPIE Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation, Glasgow, Scotland, June 2004.
10. Bauer, F. H., et al. Enabling spacecraft formation flying through spaceborne GPS and enhanced automation technologies. In Proceedings of the 1999 ION-GPS Conference, Nashville, TN, Sept. 1999, 369-383.
11. Iverson, D. L. System health monitoring for space mission operations. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 2008, 1-8.
12. Bernard, D., et al. Spacecraft autonomy flight experience: The DS1 remote agent experiment. In Proceedings of the AIAA, Albuquerque, NM, 1999.
13. Smith, B., et al. Validation and verification of the remote agent for spacecraft autonomy. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 1999, 449-468.
14. Muscettola, N. Remote agent: To boldly go where no AI system has gone before. Artificial Intelligence, 103, 1-2, Aug. 1998, 5-47.
15. Williams, B. C. and Nayak, P. P. A model-based approach to reactive self-configuring systems. In Proceedings of the AIAA, Portland, OR, Aug. 1996, 971-978.
16. James, M. L. and Dubon, L. P. An autonomous diagnostic and prognostic monitoring system for NASA's Deep Space Network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 2000, 403-414.
17. Kurien, J. and R-Moreno, M. D. Cost and benefits of model-based diagnosis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 2008, 1-14.
18. Barua, A. and Khorasani, K. Intelligent model-based hierarchical fault diagnosis for satellite formations. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2007), Montreal, Canada, Oct. 2007.
19. Barua, A. and Khorasani, K. Multi-level fault diagnosis in satellite formations using fuzzy rule-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aeronautics and Astronautics (ISSCAA 2008), Shenzhen, China, Dec. 2008.
20. John, R. I. and Innocent, P. R. Modeling uncertainty in clinical diagnosis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 35, 6 (Dec. 2005), 1340-1350.
21. Huang, G. and Uang, H. Robust adaptive PID tracking control design for uncertain spacecraft systems: A fuzzy approach. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42, 4 (Oct. 2006), 1506-1514.
22. Singh, R-N. P. and Bailey, W. H. Fuzzy logic applications to multisensor-multitarget correlation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 33, 3 (July 1997), 752-769.
23. Ristic, B. Target identification using belief functions and implication rules. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 41, 3 (July 2005), 1097-1103.
24. Ganguli, R. Application of fuzzy logic for fault isolation of jet engines. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 125, 3 (July 2003), 617-623.
25. Wang, W. An intelligent system for machinery condition monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16, 1 (Feb. 2008), 110-122.
26. Yairi, T., Kato, Y., and Hori, K. Fault detection by mining association rules from house-keeping data. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, 2001.
27. Mackey, R., et al. BEAM: Technology for autonomous self-analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 2001, 2989-3001.
28. Yager, R. R. On the construction of hierarchical fuzzy systems models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, 28, 1 (Feb. 1998), 55-66.
29. Wang, W. An enhanced diagnostic system for gear system monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 38, 1 (Feb. 2008), 102-112.
30. Gessner, R., et al. Hierarchical FDIR concepts in S/C systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps2004), Montreal, Canada, May 2004.
31. Korbicz, J., Koscieny, J. M., Kowalczuk, Z., and Cholewa, W. (Eds.) Fault Diagnosis: Models, Artificial Intelligence, Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2004.
32. Blanke, M., et al. Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006.
33. Talebi, H. A., Khorasani, K., and Tafazoli, S. A recurrent neural network-based sensor and actuator fault detection and isolation for nonlinear systems with application to the satellite's attitude control subsystem. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 20, 1 (Jan. 2009), 45-60.
34. Tudoroiu, N. and Khorasani, K. Satellite fault diagnosis using a bank of interactive Kalman filters. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 43, 4 (Oct. 2007), 1334-1350.
35. Barua, A., Sinha, P., and Khorasani, K. A diagnostic tree approach for fault cause identification in the attitude control subsystem of satellites. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 45, 3 (July 2009), 983-1002.
36. Joshi, A., et al. Intelligent and learning-based approaches for health monitoring and fault diagnosis of RADARSAT-1 attitude control system. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2007), Montreal, Canada, Oct. 2007.
37. Al-Zyoud, I. A. and Khorasani, K. Neural network-based actuator fault diagnosis for attitude control subsystem of an unmanned space vehicle. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN-2006), Vancouver, Canada, July 2006.
38. Li, Z. Q., Ma, L., and Khorasani, K. A dynamic neural network-based reaction wheel fault diagnosis for satellites. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN-2006), Vancouver, Canada, July 2006.
39. Valdes, A. and Khorasani, K. A pulsed plasma thruster fault detection and isolation strategy for formation flying of satellites. Applied Soft Computing, (Sept. 2009); DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.09.005.
40. Isermann, R. Model-based fault detection and diagnosis-Status and applications. Annual Reviews in Control, 29 (2005), 71-85.
41. Patton, R. J., et al. Reliable fault diagnosis scheme for a spacecraft attitude control system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 222, 2 (2008), 139-152.
42. Henry, D. Fault diagnosis of microscope satellite thrusters using H1/H filters. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 31, 3 (May-June 2008), 699-711.
43. Wells, G. J., Zee, R. E., and Damaren, C. J. Hardware emulation strategies for concurrent microsatellite hardware and software development. Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, 48, 1 (Mar. 2002), 87-95.
44. Pell, B., et al. An autonomous spacecraft agent prototype. In Autonomous Robots 5, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998, 29-52.
45. Watson, D. P. and Scheidt, D. H. Autonomous systems. John Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 26, 4 (2005), 368-376.
46. Zimmermann, H. J. Fuzzy Set Theory-and Its Applications (4th ed.). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
47. Koscieny, J. M. and Syfert, M. Fuzzy diagnostic reasoning that takes into account the uncertainty of the relation between faults and symptoms. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 16, 1 (2006), 27-35.
48. Hill, G. W. Researches in lunar theory. American Journal of Mathematics, 1, 1 (1878), 5-26.
49. Vadali, S. R., Vaddi, S. S., and Alfriend, K. T. An intelligent control concept for formation flying satellites. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 12 (2002), 97-115.
50. Hughes, P. C. Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1186.
51. Ren, W. and Beard, R. W. Decentralized scheme for spacecraft formation flying via the virtual structure approach. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 27, 1 (Jan. 2004), 73-82.
52. Ogata, K. Modern Control Engineering (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
53. Bialke, B. High fidelity mathematical modeling of reaction wheel performance. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 98 (1998), 483-496.
54. Jiang, Z., Liu, S., and Dougal, R. A. Design and testing of spacecraft power systems using VTB. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 39, 3 (July 2003), 976-989.
55. Satellite Electrical Power System USC Virtual Test Bed Homepage, cited: February 2010. [Online], available: Http://vtb.ee.sc.edu/applications/. [Online], available: Http://vtb.ee.sc.edu/applications/.
56. Jiang, Z., Dougal, R. A., and Liu, S. Application of VTB in design and testing of satellite electrical power systems. Journal of Power Sources, 122 (2003), 95-108.
57. Class Confusion Matrix Alias-i LingPipe Web Resource, cited: February 2010. http://aliasi.com/lingpipe/docs/api/com/aliasi/classify/ ConfusionMatrix.html.