Jamaican Field Cricket Mate Attraction Signals Provide Age Cues

Ethology

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1050-1055

  Bertram, Susan M ^a   Rook, Vanessa ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; CRICKET; FIELD SURVEY; MATE ATTRACTION; MATING BEHAVIOR; SIGNAL;

GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS ASSIMILIS;

EID: 80053925815     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01958.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benjamini, Y. & Yekutieli, D. 2001: The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 29, 1165-1188.
2. Benjamini, Y., Drai, D., Elmer, N. & Golani, I. 2001: Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 279-284.
3. Bertram, S. M. 2000: The influence of age and size on temporal mate signalling behaviour. Anim. Behav. 60, 333-339.
4. Bertram, S. M. & Warren, P. S. 2005: Trade-offs in signalling components differ with signalling effort. Anim. Behav. 70, 477-484.
5. Bertram, S. M., Whattam, E. M., Visanuvimol, L., Bennett, R. & Lauzon, C. 2009: Phosphorus availability influences cricket mate attraction displays. Anim. Behav. 77, 525-530.
6. Brooks, R. & Kemp, D. J. 2001: Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 308-323.
7. Hunt, J., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. D., Smith, M. J., Bentsen, C. L. & Bussiere, L. F. 2004: High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432, 1024-1027.
8. Jacot, A., Scheuber, H. & Brinkhof, M. W. G. 2007: The effect of age on a sexually selected acoustic display. Ethology 113, 615-620.
9. Judge, K. A. 2011: Do male field crickets, Gryllus pennsylvanicus, signal their age? Anim. Behav. 81, 185-194.
10. Judge, K. A., Ting, J. J. & Gwynne, D. T. 2008: Condition dependence of male life span and calling effort in a field cricket. Evolution 62, 868-878.
11. Kokko, H. & Lindstrom, J. 1996: Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1533-1538.
12. Maklakov, A. A., Hall, M. D., Simpson, S. J., Dessmann, J., Clissold, F. J., Zajitschek, F., Lailvaux, S. P., Raubenheimer, D., Bonduriansky, R. & Brooks, R. C. 2009: Sex differences in nutrient-dependent reproductive ageing. Aging Cell 8, 324-330.
13. Nakagawa, S. 2004: A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15, 1044-1045.
14. Narum, S. R. 2006: Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 7, 783-787.
15. Trivers, R. L. 1972: Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (Campbell, B., ed.). Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 136-179.
16. Verburgt, L., Ferreira, M. & Ferguson, J. W. H. 2011: Male field cricket song reflects age, allowing females to prefer young males. Anim. Behav. 81, 19-29.
17. Whattam, E. M. & Bertram, S. M. 2011: Effects of juvenile and adult condition on long-distance call components in the Jamaican field cricket, Gryllus assimilis. Anim. Behav. 81, 135-144.
18. Williams, G. C. 1966: Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100, 687-690.