Current role of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (2011): A clinical guideline of the Austrian societies of cardiology and radiology;Aktueller Stellenwert der MSCTA in der Koronargefäßdiagnostik (2011): Klinischer Leitfaden der Österreichischen Gesellschaften für Kardiologie und Radiologie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 183, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 964-971

  Hergan, K ^a   Globits, S ^b   Loewe, C ^c   Gessner, M ^d   Artmann, A ^e   Pichler, P ^f   Sommer, O ^g   Schuchlenz, H ^h   Stadler, A ⁱ   Sochor, H ^f   Wolf, F ^c   Friedrich, G ^j  

^a PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b Karl Landsteiner Institute for Implementation of Innovative Techniques in Cardiac Surgery   (Austria)

^c UNIV KLIN FÜR RADIODIAGNOSTIK   (Austria)

^d HANUSCH HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^e Klinikum Wels Grieskirchen   (Austria)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^g Kardinal Schwarzenbergsches Krankenhaus   (Austria)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRAZ   (Austria)

ⁱ Krankenhaus Hietzing   (Austria)

^j INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARTIFACTS; AUSTRIA; CALCINOSIS; CALCIUM; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; RADIATION DOSAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 80053913091     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281640     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Einstein A J., Henzlova M J., Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007 298 317-323 (Pubitemid 47080486)
2. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al. Radiation dose associated with common CT examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. ArchIntMed 2009 169 2078-2086
3. Rumberger J A., Schwartz R S., Simons D B. et al. Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy. Am J Cardiol 1994 73 1169-1173 (Pubitemid 24184389)
4. Budoff M J., Georgiou D, Brody A et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation 1996 93 898-904 (Pubitemid 26074826)
5. Sangiorgi G, Rumberger J A., Severson A et al. Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 31 126-133 (Pubitemid 28064732)
6. Rumberger J A., Simons D B., Fitzpatrick L A. et al. Coronary artery calcium area by electron beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995 92 2157-2162
7. Gschnitzer H, Stöger A, Friedrich G et al. Electron beam computed tomography detects calcifications but not plaque burden: an in vitro comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1999 100 I-230
8. Rumberger J A., Behrenbeck T, Breen J F. et al. Coronary calcification by electron beam computed tomography and obstructive coronary artery disease: a model for costs and effectiveness of diagnosis as compared with conventional cardiac testing methods. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 33 453-462 (Pubitemid 29234208)
9. Rumberger J A., Sheedy P F., Breen J F. et al. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium score cut-points and severity of associated angiographic lumen stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 29 1542-1548 (Pubitemid 27272448)
10. Gottlieb I, Miller J M., Arbab-Zadeh A et al. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 55 627-634
11. Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A et al. Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001 37 451-457
12. Schmermund A, Möhlenkamp S, Berenbein S et al. Population-based assessment of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis using electron-beam computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 2006 185 177-182 (Pubitemid 43117566)
13. Rumberger J A., Sheedy P F., Breen J F. et al. EBCT coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiographic lumen stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 29 1542-1548 (Pubitemid 27272448)
14. Budoff M J., Daimond G A., Raggi P et al. Continous probalistic prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease using EBT. Circulation 2002 105 1791-1796 (Pubitemid 34408888)
15. Möhlenkamp S, Lehmann N, Schmermund A et al. EBT-based coronary calcium quantities predict future hard events in symptomatic males with advanced coronary artery disease a 5 year follow-up study. Eur Heart J 2003 24 845-854
16. He Z X., Hedrick T D., Pratt C M. et al. Severity of coronary artery calcification by EBCT predicts silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2000 101 244-251 (Pubitemid 30054150)
17. Möhlenkamp S, Schmermund A, Kerkhoff G et al. Prognostischer Nutzen der nicht-invasive bestimmten koronaren Plaquelast bei Patienten mit Risikofaktoren. Z Kardiol 2003 92 351-361 (Pubitemid 36609499)
18. Schmermund A, Bailey K, Rumberger J A. et al. An algorithm for non-invasive identification of angiographic three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients on the basis of cardiac and EBCT calcium scores. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 33 444-452 (Pubitemid 29234207)
19. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Adamzik M et al. Comparison of EBCT and IVUS in detecting calcified and non-calcified plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes and no or minimal to moderate angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1998 81 141-146 (Pubitemid 28057195)
20. Sarwar A, Shaw L J., Shapiro M D. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 675-688
21. Michos E D., Nasir K, Braunstein J B. et al. Framingham risk equation underestimates subclinical atherosclerosis risk in asymptomatic women. Atherosclerosis 2006 184 201-206 (Pubitemid 41721089)
22. Lakoski S G., Greenland P, Wong N D. et al. Coronary artery calcium scores and risk for cardiovascular events in women classified as low risk based on Framingham risk score: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med 2007 167 2437-2442 (Pubitemid 350254902)
23. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen S P. et al. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004 291 210-215 (Pubitemid 38082815)
24. McClelland R L., Chung H, Detrano R et al. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation 2006 113 30-37 (Pubitemid 43958485)
25. Oudkerk M, Stillman A E., Halliburton S S. et al. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Int J Cardiovasc imaging 2008 24 645-671
26. Blaha M, Budoff M J., Shaw L J. et al. Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 692-700
27. Detrano R, Guerci A D., Carr J J. et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 2008 358 1336-1345 (Pubitemid 351468410)
28. Greenland P, Bonow R O., Brundage B H. et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 49 378-402
29. Mc Cullough P A., Chinnaiyan K M. Annual progression of coronary calcification in trials of preventive therapies: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2009 169 2064-2070
30. Maintz D, Seifarth H et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006 16 818-826 (Pubitemid 43380241)
31. Cademartiri F, Mollet N R. et al. Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. AJR 2006 186 634-638 (Pubitemid 46100249)
32. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50 2393-2398 (Pubitemid 50011578)
33. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography Initial experience. European Journal of Radiology 2006 57 331-335 (Pubitemid 43254911)
34. Leber A W., Johnson T, Becker A. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007 28 2354-2360 (Pubitemid 47537778)
35. Artmann A, Enayati S, Ratzenböck M et al. Bildqualität von CT-Angiografien der Koronararterien in Abhängigkeit vom Ausmaß der Koronarverkalkungen bei Einsatz eines Dual-Source-CTs. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 863-869
36. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008 94 1132-1137
37. Leschka L, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual sourceCT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 2009 19 2896-2903
38. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008 29 766-776 (Pubitemid 351431025)
39. Mowatt G, Cook J A., Hillis G S. et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008 94 1386-1393
40. Budoff M J., Achenbach S, Blumenthal R S. et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006 114 1761-179
41. Patel M R., Hendel R C., Kramer C M. et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48 1475-1497
42. Pugliese F, Mollet N R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006 16 575-582 (Pubitemid 44149369)
43. Nikolaou K, Knez A et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR 2006 186 1659-1668
44. Leschka S, Wildermuth S et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006 241 378-385 (Pubitemid 44632882)
45. Pannu H K., Jacobs J E. et al. Coronary CT angiography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility. AJR 2006 186 341-345
46. Nieman K, Pattynama P M., Rensing B J. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 2003 229 749-756 (Pubitemid 37467580)
47. Frazier A A., Qureshi F et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late postoperative settings. Radiographics 2005 25 881-896 (Pubitemid 41196927)
48. Moore R, Sampson C et al. Coronary artery bypass graft imaging using ECG-gated multislice computed tomography: comparison with catheter angiography. Clin Radiol 2005 60 990-998 (Pubitemid 41194670)
49. Budoff M J., Dowe D, Jollis J et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 1724-1732
50. Dewey M, Vavere A L., Arbab-Zadeh A et al. Patient characteristic as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronarystenoses: CORE-64 multicenter international trail. AJR 2010 194 93-10
51. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005 26 1482
52. Leber A W., Knez A, Ziegler F von et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 46 147
53. Raff G L., Gallagher M J., ONeill W W. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 46 552
54. Kopp A F., Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row CT. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 2002 23 1714-1725 (Pubitemid 36287783)
55. Budoff M J., Dowe D, Jollis J G. et al. (ACCURACY trial): Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 1724-32
56. Miller J M., Rochitte C E., Dewey M et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT (Core 64). N Engl J Med 2008 359 2324-36
57. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row CT with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy. Circulation 2009 120 867-875
58. Meijboom W B., Meijs M FL, Schuijf J D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 2135-2144
59. Maffei E, Palumbo A, Martini C et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularization: registry data and review of multicenter trial. Radiol med 2010 115 368-384
60. Raff G L., Abidov A, Achenbach S et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2009 3 122-136
61. Achenbach S. Assessing the prognostic value of coronary CT angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 1344-1346
62. Min J K., Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A et al. Clinical benefits of non-invasive testing:coronary computed tomography angiography as a test case. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 3 305-315
63. Tamarappoo B K., Dey D, Nakazato R et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 3 1010-1019
64. Kirsch J, Araoz P A., Steinberg F B. et al. Prevalence and significance of incidental extracardiac findings at 64-multidetector coronary CTA. J Thorac Imaging 2007 22 330-334 (Pubitemid 350196952)
65. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae C U. et al. Coronary computed tomography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain (ROMICAT trial). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 53 1642-1650
66. Roguin A, Abadi S, Engel A et al. Novel method for real-time hybrid cardiac CT and coronary angiography image registration: visualising beyond luminology, proof-of-concept. Eurointervention 2009 4 648-53
67. Litmanovich D, Zamboni G A., Hauser T H. et al. ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and triphasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain. Eur Radiol 2008 18 308-317 (Pubitemid 351234050)
68. Rubinshtein R, Halon D A., Caspar T et al. Impact of 64-slice cardiac CT angiography on clinical decision-making in emergency department patients with chest pain of possible myocardial ischemic origin. Am J Cardiol 2007 100 1522-1526 (Pubitemid 350050859)
69. Schertler T, Scheffel H, Frauenfelder T et al. Dual-source computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain:feasibility and image quality. Eur Radiol 2007 17 3179-3188 (Pubitemid 350142343)
70. Vrachliotis T G., Bis K G., Haidary A et al. Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement at biphasic single-injection 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007 243 368-376 (Pubitemid 46649691)
71. Kim S Y., Seo J B. et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multidetector row CT findings with angiographic correlation. Radiographics 2006 26 317-334
72. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malago R et al. Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med 2008 113 363-375
73. Pichler P, Loewe C, Roedler S et al. Detection of high-grade stenoses with multislice computed tomography in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 310-316 (Pubitemid 351375108)
74. Feuchtner G M., Dichtl W, Muller S et al. 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 W1-W7 (Pubitemid 351955186)
75. Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 2007 245 111-121 (Pubitemid 47417794)
76. Jassal D S., Shapiro M D., Neilan T G. et al. 64-slice MDCT for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity. Invest Radiol 2007 42 507-512 (Pubitemid 46955245)
77. Blanke P, Siepe M, Reinöhl J et al. Assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for Edwards SAPIEN transapical heart valve implantation by computed tomography: calculating average diameter using a virtual ring method. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 38 750-758
78. Ben-Dor I, Waksman R, Hanna N N. et al. Utility of radiologic review for noncardiac findings on MSCT in patients with severe aortic stenosis evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2010 105 1461-1464
79. Koos R, Mahnken A H., Dohmen G et al. Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 2010 (in press)
80. Schuijf J D., Pundziute G, Jukema J W. et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 2007 245 416-423 (Pubitemid 47612522)
81. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated-64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2008 18 234-243 (Pubitemid 351234043)
82. Carraba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi L M. et al. Usefulness of 64-slice MDCT for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2007 100 1754-1758 (Pubitemid 350234794)
83. Das K M., El-Menyar A A., Salm A M. et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary MDCT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 2007 245 424-432 (Pubitemid 47612523)
84. Hecht H S., Zaric M, Jelnin V et al. Usefulness of 64-detector CT angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2008 101 820-824
85. Manghat N, Van Lingen R, Hewson P et al. Usefulness of 64-detector row CT for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2008 101 1567-1573
86. Feuchtner G, Jodocy D, Klauser A et al. radiation dose reduction by using 100-kVtube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. European J of Radiology 2010 75 e51-e56
87. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007 37 1-332
88. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010 31 340-346
89. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H et al. Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters. Eur J Radiol 2008 68 385-391
90. Einstein A J., Elliston C D., Arai A E. et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 2010 254 698-706
91. Faulkner K, Werduch A. An estimate of the collective dose to the European population from cardiac X-ray procedures. Br J Radiol 2008 81 955-962
92. Goetti R, Leschka S, Baumuller S et al. Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. Invest Radiol 2010 45 324-330
93. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009 301 500-507
94. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008 248 424-430
95. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid F T. et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008 18 1809-1817
96. Leschka L, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 2009 19 2896-2903
97. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 2009 19 2576-2583
98. Arnoldi E, Johnson T R., Rist C et al. Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 2009 19 2147-2155
99. Rybicki F J., Otero H J., Steigner M L. et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008 24 535-546
100. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008 94 1132-1137
101. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Betschart T et al. Radiation dose values for various coronary calcium scoring protocols in dual-source CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 25 443-451
102. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008 249 71-80
103. Zimmermann E, Dewey M. Whole heart 320-row computed tomography: reducton of radiation dose via prior coronary calcium scanning. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 54-59
104. Ketelsen D, Buchgeister M, Fenchel M et al. Estamation of radiation exposure of prospectively triggered 128-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 1105-1109