Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of NanoBone ® and BioOss ® for human osteoblasts

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1259-1264

  Liu, Qin ^a   Douglas, Timothy ^a   Zamponi, Christiane ^b   Becker, Stephan T ^a   Sherry, Eugene ^c   Sivananthan, Sureshan ^d   Warnke, Frauke ^e   Wiltfang, Jörg ^a   Warnke, Patrick H ^c  

^a Dept of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; BioOss ; Bone tissue engineering; Nanobone ; Natural; Osteoblast; Synthetic

Indexed keywords

2 (4 IODOPHENYL) 3 (4 NITROPHENYL) 5 (2,4 DISULFOPHENYL) 2H TETRAZOLIUM; 2-(4-IODOPHENYL)-3-(4-NITROPHENYL)-5-(2,4-DISULFOPHENYL)-2H-TETRAZOLIUM; 3',6' DIACETYLFLUORESCEIN; 3',6'-DIACETYLFLUORESCEIN; BIO OSS; BIO-OSS; BIOMATERIAL; BROXURIDINE; COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DYES, REAGENTS, INDICATORS, MARKERS AND BUFFERS; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; FLUORESCENT DYE; HYDROXYAPATITE; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; MINERAL; NANOBONE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TETRAZOLIUM; THIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; THIAZOLYL BLUE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE MATRIX; BONE PROSTHESIS; CATTLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE MATRIX; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BROMODEOXYURIDINE; CATTLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; COLORING AGENTS; DRUG COMBINATIONS; DURAPATITE; FLUORESCEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMANS; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; L-LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MINERALS; OSTEOBLASTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TETRAZOLIUM SALTS; THIAZOLES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 80053898439     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02100.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Al Ruhaimi, K.A. (2001) Bone graft substitutes: a comparative qualitative histologic review of current osteoconductive grafting materials. International Journal of Oral and Macillofacial Implants 16: 105-114.
2. Becker, S.T., Vontbein, R., Volpe, N.J. & Schiefer, U. (2005) Factors influencing reaction time during automated kinetic perimetry on the Tübingen computer campimeter. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 46: 2633-2638.
3. Carmagnola, D., Adriaens, P. & Berglundh, T. (2003) Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-oss. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 137-143.
4. Carpio, L., Loza, J., Lynch, S. & Genco, R. (2000) Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone material. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable vs. non-resorbable barriers. Journal of Periodontology 71: 1743-1749.
5. ®. Via Medica 65: 54-55.
6. Duda, M. & Pajak, J. (2004) The issue of bioresorption of the Bio-Oss xenogeneic bone substitute in bone defects. Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska [Med] 59: 269-277.
7. Gerber, T., Holzhüter, G., Knoblich, B., Dörfling, P., Bienengräber, V. & Henkel, K.-O. (2000) Development of bioactivative sol-gel material template for in vitro and in vivo synthesis of bone material. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 19: 441-445.
8. Gerike, W., Bienengräber, V., Henkel, K.O., Bayerlein, T., Proff, P., Gedrange, T., Gerber, T. (2006) The manufacture of synthetic non-sintered and degradable bone grafting substitutes. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 65: 54-55.
9. Götz, W., Gerber, T., Michel, B., Lossdörfer, S., Henkel, K.O. & Heinemann, F. (2008) Immunhistochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel (NanoBone(s)) osteogenesis: a study on biopsies from human jaws. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 1016-1026.
10. Henkel, K.O., Gerber, T., Lenz, S., Gundlach, K.K. & Bienengräber, V. (2006) Macroscopical, histological, and morphometric studies of porous bone-replacement materials in minipigs 8 months after implantation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 102: 606-613.
11. Hürzeler, M.B., Kirsch, A., Ackermann, K.L. & Quinones, C.R. (1996) Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 11: 466-475.
12. Kasaj, A., Willershausen, B., Reichert, C., Gortan-Kasaj, A., Zafiropoulos, G.G. & Schmidt, M. (2008) Human periodontal fibroblast response to a nanostructured hydroxyapatite bone replacement graft in vitro. Archives of Oral Biology 53: 683-689.
13. Kirchhoff, M., Bienengräber, V., Lenz, S., Gerber, T. & Henkel, K.-O. (2006) A new synthetic bone replacement material with osteoinductive properties - in vivo investigations. BIOmaterialien 80: 7.
14. Mayfield, L.J., Skoglund, A., Hising, P., Lang, N.P. & Attstrom, R. (2001) Evaluation following functional loading of titanium fixtures placed in ridges augmented by deprkoteinized bone mineral. A human case study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 508-514.
15. Rumpel, E., Wolf, E., Kauschke, E., Bienengräber, V., Bayerlein, T., Gedrange, T. & Proff, P. (2006) The biodegradation of hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in vivo. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 65: 43-48.
16. Schlegel, A.K. & Donath, K. (1998) Bio-Oss-a resorbale bone substitute? Journal of Long Term Effects of Medical Implants 8: 201-209.
17. Skoglund, A., Hising, P. & Young, C. (1997) A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 194-199.
18. ®. An experimental study in the rat. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31: 30-39.
19. Zitzmann, N.U., Schärer, P. & Marinello, C.P. (2001) Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 16: 355-366.