Hearing impairments hidden in normal listeners

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 39, 2011, Pages 16139-16140

  Shamma, Shihab A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOMETRY; COCHLEA; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MESENCEPHALON; NOTE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMMUNICATION; HEARING; HUMANS;

EID: 80053653096     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112841108     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Oxenham AJ, Bernstein JG, Penagos H (2004) Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 1421-1425. (Pubitemid 38182704)
2. Shamma S, Klein D (2000) The case of the missing pitch templates: How harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2631-2644. (Pubitemid 30304909)
3. McAlpine D, Jiang D, Palmer A (2001) A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals. Nat Neurosci 4:396-401. (Pubitemid 32260116)
4. Popper AN, Fay RR, eds (2005) Sound Source Localization (Springer, New York).
5. Moore BCJ (2004) An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (Elsevier Academic Press, London).
6. Shamma S (1999) Physiological bases of timbre perception. The New Cognitive Neurosciences, ed Michael Gazzaniga (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
7. Pickles JO (2003) An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK).
8. Ruggles D, Bharadwaj H, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2011) Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding ofsuprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 15516-15521.
9. Bronkhorst AW (2000) The cocktail party phenomenon: A review on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acust Act Acust 86:117-128.
10. Strelcyk O, Dau T (2009) Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 125:3328-3345.
11. Smith JC, Marsh JT, Brown WS (1975) Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: Evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39:465-472.
12. Wong PC, Skoe E, Russo NM, Dees T, Kraus N (2007) Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nat Neurosci 10:420-422. (Pubitemid 46494592)
13. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29:14077-14085.
14. Russo NM, et al. (2008) Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Clin Neurophysiol 119:1720-1731.
15. Lorenzi C, Moore BCJ (2008) Role of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in speech perception: A review. Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners, First International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR 2007), eds Dau T, Buchholz JM, Harte JM, Christiansen TU (Center-Tryk, Holbaek, Denmark).
16. Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ (1990) Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47: 103-138. (Pubitemid 20244652)
17. Joris PX, Smith PH, Yin TC (1998) Coincidence detection in the auditory system: 50 years after Jeffress. Neuron 21:1235-1238. (Pubitemid 29022526)