Evaluation of alternative PCB clean-up strategies using an individual-based population model of mink

Environmental Pollution

Volumn 159, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3334-3343

  Salice, Christopher J ^a   Sample, Bradley E ^b   Miller Neilan, Rachael ^c,d   Rose, Kenneth A ^c   Sable, Shaye ^c,e  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Ecological Risk Inc   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Dynamic Solutions LLC Knoxville   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological risk; Individual based model; Mink; PCBs; Population level assessment

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL RISKS; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS; MINK; PCBS; POPULATION-LEVEL ASSESSMENT;

ECOLOGY; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS; POPULATION STATISTICS; RATING;

ORGANIC POLLUTANTS;

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL;

EXTINCTION RISK; PCB; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION SIZE; REMEDIATION; SMALL MAMMAL; TOXICOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; INDIVIDUAL BASED POPULATION MODEL; MALE; MINK; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; POPULATION EXPOSURE; POPULATION SIZE; PROBABILITY; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; FEMALE; MALE; MINK; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS;

MUSTELA;

EID: 80053628260     PISSN: 02697491     EISSN: 18736424     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.033     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. A.W. Allen Habitat Suitability Index Models: Mink 1984 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/10.61 revised
2. L.W. Barnthouse, W.R. Munns, and M.T. Sorensen Population-level Ecological Risk Assessment 2008 CRC Boca Raton, FL
3. N. Basu, A.M. Scheuhammer, S.J. Bursian, J. Eilliott, K. Rouvinen-Watt, and H.M. Chan Mink as a sentinel species in environmental health Environmental Research 103 2007 130 144 (Pubitemid 44895611)
4. G.R. Biddinger, P. Calow, P. Delorme, G. Harris, B. Hope, B.-L. Lin, M.T. Sorensen, and P. van den Brink Chapter 2: managing risk to ecological populations L.W. Barnthouse, W.R. Munns, M.T. Sorensen, Population-level Ecological Risk Assessment 2008 CRC Boca Raton, FL 7 40
5. M.R. Bleavins, R.J. Aulerich, and R.K. Ringer Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors 1016 and 1242): effect on survival and reproduction in mink and ferrets Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 9 1980 627 635 (Pubitemid 10004279)
6. M.R. Bleavins, W.J. Breslin, R.J. Aulerich, and R.K. Ringer Placental and mammary transfer of a polychlorinated biphenyl mixture (Aroclor 1254) in the European Ferret (Mustela putorius furo) Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 3 1984 637 644
7. L. Bonesi, L.A. Harrington, T. Maran, V.E. Sidorovich, and D.W. MacDonald Demography of three populations of American mink Mustela vison in Europe Mammal Review 36 2006 98 1006
8. H. Broseth, O. Flagstad, C. Wardig, M. Johansson, and H. Ellegren Large-scale noninvasive genetic monitoring of wolverines using scats reveals density dependent adult survival Biological Conservation 143 2010 113 120
9. T.J. Bucci, R.M. Kovatch, M.D. Mercieca, V. Perman, and J.S. Klingensmith Two-generation reproductive study of mink fed disoproply methlyphosphonate (DIMP) Reproductive Toxicology 17 2003 327 334 (Pubitemid 36626955)
10. Bursian, S.J., Aulerich, R.J., Yamini, B., Tillit, D.E., 2003. Dietary Exposure of Mink to Fish From the Housatonic River: Effects on Reproduction and Survival. Roy F. Weston, Inc. July 3. Submitted for publication.
11. D.T. Crouse, L.B. Crowder, and H. Caswell A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation Ecology 68 1987 1412 1423
12. T. Dalkvist, C.J. Topping, and V.E. Forbes Population-level impacts of pesticide-induced chronic effects on individuals depend more on ecology than toxicology Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 72 2009 1663 1672
13. D.L. DeAngelis, and W.M. Mooij Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36 2005 147 168 (Pubitemid 43068854)
14. R.K. Enders Reproduction in the mink (Mustela vison) Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96 1952 691 755
15. V. Forbes, R. Sibly, and P. Calow Toxicant impacts on density-limited populations: a critical review of theory, practice, and results Ecological Applications 11 2001 1249 1257 (Pubitemid 32731606)
16. C.W. Fowler Density dependence as related to life history strategy Ecology 63 1981 602 610
17. J.S. Freshman, and C.A. Menzie Two wildlife exposure models to assess impacts at the individual and population levels and the efficacy of remedial actions Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2 1996 481 498 (Pubitemid 126713675)
18. P.C. Fuchsman, T.R. Barber, and M.J. Bock Effectiveness of various exposure metrics in defining dose-response relationships for mink (Mustela vison) exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 54 2008 130 144
19. V. Grimm Ten years of individual-based modelling ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling 115 1999 129 148 (Pubitemid 29111904)
20. A.J. Hall, B.J. McConnell, T.K. Rowles, A. Aguilar, A. Borrell, L. Schwacke, P.J.H. Reijnders, and R.S. Wells Individual-based model framework to assess population consequences of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure in bottlenose dolphins Environmental Health Perspectives 114 Suppl. 1 2006 60 64
21. M. Hammershoj, J.M.J. Travis, and C.M. Stephenson Incorporating evolutionary processes into a spatially-explicit model: exploring the consequences of mink-farm closures in Denmark Ecography 29 2006 465 476 (Pubitemid 44933517)
22. B.K. Hope Generating probabilistic spatially-explicit individual and population exposure estimates for ecological risk assessments Risk Analysis 20 2000 573 589
23. T.C. Hornshaw, R.J. Aulerich, and H.E. Johnson Feeding Great Lakes fish to mink: effects on mink and accumulation and elimination of PCBs by mink Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 11 4 1983 933 946 (Pubitemid 13018660)
24. K. Kannan, A.L. Blankenship, P.D. Jones, and J.P. Geisy Toxicity reference values for the toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls to aquatic mammals Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 6 2000 181 201
25. V.J. Kramer, M.A. Etterson, Markus Hecker, C.A. Murphy, G. Roesijadi, D.J. Spade, J.A. Spromberg, M. Wang, and G.T. Ankley Adverse outcome pathways and ecological risk assessment: bridging to population-level effects Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30 2011 64 76
26. R. Lande Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes American Naturalist 142 1993 911
27. S. Lariviere Mutela Vison Mammalian Species No. 608 1999 The American Society of Mammalogists 1-9
28. T. Lode, and D. Peltier Genetic neighborhood and effective population size in the endangered European mink Mustela lutreola Biodiversity and Conservation 14 2005 251 259 (Pubitemid 40307004)
29. MacIntosh, D.L., Suter G.W., Hoffman F.O., 1992. Model of PCB and mercury exposure of mink and great blue heron inhabiting the off-site environment downstream from the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation. ORNL/ER-90.
30. Macdonald, D.W., Tattersall F.H., Johnson P.J., Carbone C., Reynolds J.C., Langbein J., Rushton S.P., Shirley M.D., (undated). Management and control of populations of foxes, deer, hares and mink in England and Wales, and the impact of hunting with dogs. A Report to the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs.
31. Moe, S.J., 2008. Chapter 4: density dependence in ecological risk assessment. In: Barnthouse L.W., Munns W.R., Sorensen M.T., Population-Level Ecological Risk Assessment. CRC, Boca Rotan, FL, pp. 69-92.
32. D.R.J. Moore, B.E. Sample, G.W. Suter, B.R. Parkhurst, and R.S. Teed A probabilistic risk assessment of the effects of methylmercury and PCBs on mink and kingfishers along East, Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18 1999 2941 2953 (Pubitemid 33594087)
33. W.R. Munns, J. Gervais, A.A. Hoffman, U. Hommen, D.E. Nacci, M. Nakamaru, R. Sibly, and C.J. Topping Chapter 9: modeling approaches to population-level risk assessment L.W. Barnthouse, W.R. Munns, M.T. Sorensen, Population-Level Ecological Risk Assessment 2008 CRC Boca Raton, FL 179 210
34. Philcox, C., Grogan A., 1997. A survey of American mink (Mustela vison) on Hiiumaa Island, Estonia. Report by The Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford.
35. K.A. Rose, L.W. Brewer, L.W. Barnthouse, G.A. Fox, N.W. Gard, M. Mendoca, K.R. Munkittrick, and L.J. Witt Ecological responses of oviparous vertebrates to contaminant effects on reproduction and development R.T. Di Giulio, D.E. Tillitt, Reproductive and Developmental Effects of Contaminants in Oviparous Vertebrates 1999 SETAC Press Pensacola, FL., 225 282
36. K.A. Rose, J.H. Cowan, K.O. Winemiller, R.A. Myers, and R. Hilborn Compensatory density-dependence in fish populations: importance, controversy, understanding, and prognosis Fish and Fisheries 2 2001 293 327 (Pubitemid 34057367)
37. B.E. Sample, and G.W. Suter Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 4. piscivorous wildlife Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18 1999 610 620
38. Sample, B.E., Hinzman R.L., Jackson B.L., Baron L., 1996. Preliminary assessment of the ecological risks to wide-ranging wildlife species on the Oak Ridge Reservation. DOE/OR/01-1407&D2.
39. G.W. Suter Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites 2000 CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group Boca Raton, FL
40. G.W. Suter Ecological Risk Assessment 2007 CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group Boca Raton, FL
41. C. Topping, R. Sibly, H. Akcakaya, G. Smith, and D. Crocker Risk assessment of UK skylark populations using life-history and individual-based landscape models Ecotoxicology 14 2005 925 936 (Pubitemid 43081663)
42. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2004. Overview of the ecological risk assessment process in the office of pesticide programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Endangered and threatened species effects determinations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, D.C. January 23, 2004.
43. M. Wang, and V. Grimm Population models in pesticide risk assessment: lessons for assessing population-level effects, recovery, and alternative exposure scenarios from modeling a small mammal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29 2010 1292 1300
44. C.D. Wren, D.B. Hunter, J.F. Leatherland, and P.M. Stokes The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methlymercury, singly and in combination on mink. II: reproduction and kit development Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 16 1987 449 454 (Pubitemid 17074722)
45. N. Yamaguchi, and D.W. MacDonald The burden of co-occupancy: intraspecific resource competition and spacing patterns in the American mink, Mustela vison Journal of Mammalogy 84 2003 1341 1355 (Pubitemid 37518942)