Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1649-1653

  Mufarrij, Patrick W ^a   Krane, L Spencer ^a   Rajamahanty, Srinivas ^a   Hemal, Ashok K ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

ABSCESS DRAINAGE; ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY ABSCESS; KIDNEY TUMOR; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROMETRY SCORING SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SCORING SYSTEM; STENT; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINOMA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80053623283     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dulabon LM, Lowrance WT, Russo P, Huang WC. Trends in renal tumor surgery delivery within the United States. Cancer 2010;116:2316-2321.
2. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors-is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomeŝ J Urol 2009;189:55-62.
3. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: Indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Urol 2001; 166:6-18. (Pubitemid 32565331)
4. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:735-740. (Pubitemid 44283660)
5. Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol 1993;7:521-526. (Pubitemid 24304809)
6. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Techniques and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 2004; 64:914-918. (Pubitemid 39469505)
7. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: An international experience. Eur Urol 2010;57:815-820.
8. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: A multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009;182:866-872.
9. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, et al. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010;58:127-132.
10. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: A comprehesive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-853.
11. Bruner B, Breau RH, Lohse CM, et al. Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011;108:67-72.
12. Babbar P, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy- current status, techniques, and future directions. Int Urol Nephrol 2011; Feb 25. Epub ahead of print.
13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
14. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 2004; 64:914-918. (Pubitemid 39469505)
15. Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial experience. J Urol 2006; 176:36-39. (Pubitemid 43815372)
16. Rogers CG, Menon M, Weise ES, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy: A multi-institutional analysis. J Robotic Surg 2008; 2:141.
17. Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: A multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 2008;180:2353-2356.
18. Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I, Akpinar H. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison of outcomes. J Endourol 2009;23:1491-1497.
19. Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Single-surgeon analysis of > 100 consecutive procedures. Urology 2009;73:306-310.
20. Gong Y, Du C, Josephson DY, et al. Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2010;28:111-115.
21. Patel MN, Krane LS, Bhandari A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2010;57:310-316.
22. Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A large single-institutional experience. Urology 2010;75:1328-1334.
23. Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, et al. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J Urol 2010;183:1708-1713.
24. Samplaski MK, Hernandez A, Gill IS, Simmons MN. C-index is associated with functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2010;184:2259-2263.
25. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786-793.
26. Waldert M, Waalkes S, Klatte T, et al. External validation of the preoperative anatomical classification for prediction of complications related to nephron-sparing surgery. World J Urol 2010;28:531-535.