Temporal retinal sensitivity in mesopic adaptation

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 615-624

  Matesanz, Beatriz M ^a   Issolio, Luis ^b   Arranz, Isabel ^a   De la Rosa, Cristina ^a   Menéndez, José A ^a   Mar, Santiago ^a   Aparicio, Juan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE TUCUMÁN   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cones; Early adaptation; Mesopic; Rods

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; DARK ADAPTATION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; TIME; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; DARK ADAPTATION; HUMANS; LIGHTING; RETINA; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053621546     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00859.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Charman WN. Vision and driving: a literature review and commentary. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 371-391.
2. Andre J & Owens DA. The twilight envelope: a user-centered approach to describing roadway illumination at night. Hum Factors 2001; 43: 620-630.
3. Mayeur A, Brémond R & Bastien JM. Effect of task and eccentricity of the target on detection thresholds in mesopic vision: implications for road lighting. Hum Factors 2008; 50: 712-721.
4. Geisler WS. Initial-image and afterimage discrimination in the human rod and cone systems. J Physiol 1979; 294: 165-179.
5. Adelson EH. Saturation and adaptation in the rod system. Vision Res 1982; 22: 1299-1312.
6. Greenstein VC & Hood DC. Foveal-parafoveal differences in suprathreshold response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18 (ARVO suppl.): 29.
7. Finkelstein M & Hood D. Cone system saturation: more than one stage of sensitivity loss. Vision Res 1981; 21: 319-328.
8. Hayhoe MM, Benimoff NI & Hood DC. The time-course of multiplicative and subtractive adaptation process. Vision Res 1987; 27: 1981-1996.
9. Frumkes TE, Sekuler MD, Barris MC, Reiss EH & Chalupa LM. Rod-cone interaction in human scotopic vision-I. Temporal analysis. Vision Res 1973; 13: 1269-1282.
10. Zele AJ & Vingrys AJ. Flicker adaptation can be explained by probability summation between ON- and OFF-mechanisms. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000; 28: 227-229.
11. Zele AJ & Vingrys AJ. Defining the detection mechanisms for symmetric and rectified. Vision Res 2007; 47: 2700-2713.
12. Zele AJ, Cao D & Pokorny J. Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway. Vision Res 2008; 48: 2593-2598.
13. Bodmann HW, Greule R & Kokoschka S. Contrast thresholds at transient adaptation. CIE Proc 22nd Session Melbourne 1991; 1: 25-28.
14. Bichao IC, Yager D & Meng T. Disability glare: effects of temporal characteristics of the glare source and of the visual-field location of the test stimulus. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1995; 12: 2252-2258.
15. Plainis S, Murray IJ & Charman WN. The role of retinal adaptation in night driving. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 682-688.
16. Stockman A & Sharpe LT. Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 225-239.
17. Plainis S & Murray IJ. Reaction times as a index of visual conspicuity when driving at night. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 409-415.
18. Cao D, Zele AJ & Pokorny J. Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model. Vision Res 2007; 47: 1060-1074.
19. Boynton RM, Bush WR & Enoch JM. Rapid changes in foveal sensitivity resulting from direct and indirect adapting stimuli. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1954; 44: 56-60.
20. Hood D & Finkelstein M. Sensitivity to light. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol 1 (Boff K, Kaufman L & Thomas J, editors), Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986; Chap 5, pp.10-11.
21. Riopelle AJ & Bevan W Jr. The distribution of scotopic sensitivity in human vision. Am J Psychol 1953; 66: 73-80.
22. CIE technical report No. 41 (TC-1.4). Light as a True Visual Quantity: Principles of Measurement. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, Paris, 1978, pp. 1-40.
23. Pokorny J, Sun VCW & Smith VC. Temporal dynamics of early light adaptation. J Vis 2003; 3: 423-431.
24. Crawford B. Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1947; 134: 283-302.
25. Boynton RM, Rinalducci EJ & Sternheim C. Visibility losses produced by transient adaptational changes in the range of 0.4 to 4000 footlamberts. J Illuminat Eng 1969; 64: 217-227.
26. Boynton RM, Corwin TR & Sternheim C. Visibility losses produced by flash adaptation. J Illuminat Eng 1970; 64: 259-266.
27. Boynton RM & Miller N. Visual Performance under conditions of transient adaptation. J Illuminat Eng 1963; 58: 541-550.
28. Rinalducci EJ & Beare A. Losses in nighttime visibility caused by transient adaptation. J Illuminat Eng Soc 1974; 64: 336-345.
29. Tyler CW & Hamer RD. Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. IV. Validity of the Ferry-Porter law. J Opt Soc Am A 1990; 7: 743-747.
30. Tyler CW & Hamer RD. Eccentricity and Ferry-Porter law. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10: 2084-2086.
31. Tyler CW. Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. II. Peripheral retina and the role of photoreceptor dimensions. J Opt Soc Am A 1985; 2: 393-398.
32. Lange G, Denny N & Frumkes TE. Suppressive rod-cone interactions: evidence for separate retinal (temporal) and extraretinal (spatial) mechanisms in achromatic vision. J Opt Soc Am A 1997; 14: 2487-2498.
33. Cao D, Zele AJ & Pokorny J. Dark-adapted rod suppression of cone flicker detection: evaluation of receptoral and postreceptoral interactions. Vis Neurosci 2006; 23: 531-537.
34. Aslam TM, Haider D & Murray IJ. Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85: 354-360.