Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 470-476

  Wu, Huijuan ^a,b   De Boer, Johannes F ^c   Chen, Teresa C ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

glaucoma; optical coherence tomography; reproducibility; retinal nerve fiber layer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; THICKNESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053621330     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f3eb64     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181. (Pubitemid 21917444)
2. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:586-596.
3. Fujimoto JG, Bouma B, Tearney GJ, et al. New technology for high-speed and high-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;838:95-107. (Pubitemid 28127639)
4. Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: ultrahigh-speed, ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1715-1720. (Pubitemid 41785106)
5. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1271-1277.
6. Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Hertzmark E, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:1889-1898. (Pubitemid 26403745)
7. Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, et al. Reprodu-cibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2000;107: 2278-2282.
8. Jones AL, Sheen NJ, North RV, et al. The Humphrey optical coherence tomography scanner: quantitative analysis and reproducibility study of the normal human retinal nerve fibre layer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:673-6777.
9. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Zuppardi E, et al. Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:190-195. (Pubitemid 36068744)
10. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1716-1724. (Pubitemid 38868963)
11. Budenz DL, Chang RT, Huang X, et al. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements using the stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2440-2443. (Pubitemid 43119491)
12. Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 661-666.e4.
13. Tzamalis A, Kynigopoulos M, Schlote T, et al. Improved reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with the repeat-scan protocol using the Stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:245-252.
14. Menke MN, Knecht P, Sturm V, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using 3D Fourier-domain OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5386-5391. [Epub 1 August 1, 2008]
15. Gonzalez-Garcia AO, Vizzeri G, Bowd C, et al. Reproduci-bility of RTVue retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc measurements and agreement with Stratus optical coherence tomography measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:1067-1074, 1074.e1. [Epub March 9, 2009]
16. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1257-1263, 1263.e1-2. [Epub May 22 2009]
17. Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, et al. Agreement between Spectral-Domain and Time-Domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009. [Epub ahead of print]
18. Kim JS, Ishikawa H, Sung KR, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility improved with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009. [Epub ahead of print]
19. Schuman JS. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma (an AOS thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;106:426-458.
20. Chen TC, Zeng A, Sun W, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography and glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008;48:29-45.
21. Mujat M, Chan RC, Cense B, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness map determined from optical coherence tomography images. Optics Express. 2005;13:9480-9491. (Pubitemid 41611983)
22. Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Kamp G, et al. Measurements of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interfero-metry. Opt Comm. 1995;117:43-48.
23. Wojtkowski M, Leitgeb R, Kowalczyk A, et al. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. JBiomedical Optics. 2002;7:457-463.
24. Nassif N, Cense B, Park BH, et al. In vivo human retinal imaging by ultrahigh-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters. 2004;29:480-482.
25. Nassif N, Cense B, Park BH, et al. In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. Optics Express. 2004; 12:367-376.
26. Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Performance of fourier domain versus time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2003;11:889-894.
27. de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, et al. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters. 2003;28:2067-2069.
28. Gordon MO, Kass MA. Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:573-583. (Pubitemid 29218422)
29. Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, et al. Comparison of analytic algortihms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1684-1689.
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996; 312:1654. (Pubitemid 26229459)
31. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods. 1996; 1:30-46. (Pubitemid 126421252)
32. Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Pakter H, et al. Optical coherence tomography and histologic measurements of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3645-3654. (Pubitemid 351261100)
33. Lee EJ, Kim TW, Park KH, et al. Ability of stratus OCT to detect progressive retinal nerve layer atrophy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:662-668.
34. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3432-3437.