Counterpoint to "analysis of unbiased histopathology data from rodent toxicity studies (or, are these groups different enough to ascribe to treatment?)"

Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1017-1019

  Wolf, Jeffrey C ^a  

^a EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY LABORATORIES INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOXICOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PATHOLOGY; TOXICITY TESTS; TOXICOLOGY;

RODENTIA;

EID: 80053606541     PISSN: 01926233     EISSN: 15331601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192623311418683     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Crissman J. W., Goodman D. G., Hildebrandt P. K., Maronpot R. R., Prater D. A., Riley J. H., Seaman W. J., Thake D. C.. Best practices guideline: toxicologic histopathology. Toxicol Pathol. 2004 ; 32: 126-31 (Pubitemid 38250001)
2. Holland T., Holland C.. Analysis of unbiased histopathology data from rodent toxicity studies (or, are these groups different enough to ascribe it to treatment?). Toxicol Pathol. 2011 ; 39: 569-75