Intermodal container flow simulation model and its applications

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2224, 2011, Pages 35-41

  Meng, Qiang ^a   Wang, Shuaian ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C++ (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COMPETITION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FLOW SIMULATION; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SHIPS;

CONTAINER FLOW; FLOW SIMULATION MODELS; INTERMODAL CONTAINER TRANSPORTATIONS; INTERMODAL CONTAINERS; INTERMODAL FREIGHT; ITS APPLICATIONS; LINER SHIPPING; MODEL APPLICATION; SINGAPORE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION;

EID: 80053602642     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2224-05     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Review of Maritime Transportation 2008. Presented at United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York, Geneva. http://www. unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2008-en.pdf. Accessed July 4, 2010.
2. APL Vessel Route. Scottsdale, Ariz. http://www.apl.com/routes. Accessed July 4, 2010.
3. Christiansen, M., K. Fagerholt, and D. Ronen. Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives. Transportation Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-18.
4. Murphy, P. R., and J. M. Daley. A Comparative Analysis of Port Selection Factors. Transportation Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1994, pp. 15-21.
5. Yeo, G.-T., M. Roe, and J. Dinwoodie. Evaluating the Competitiveness of Container Ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2008, pp. 910-921.
6. Chang, Y.-T., S.-Y. Lee, and J. L. Tongzon. Port Selection Factors by Shipping Lines: Different Perspectives Between Trunk Liners and Feeder Service Providers. Marine Policy, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2008, pp. 877-885.
7. Tongzon, J. L. Port Choice and Freight Forwarders. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2009, pp. 186-195.
8. Murphy, P. R., J. M. Daley, and D. R. Dalenberg. Port Selection Criteria: An Application of a Transportation Research Framework. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1992, pp. 237-255. (Pubitemid 23366620)
9. Murphy, P. R., J. M. Daley, and P. K. Hall. Carrier Selection: Do Shippers and Carriers Agree, or Not? Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1997, pp. 67-72.
10. Malchow, M. B., and A. Kanafani. A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2001, pp. 265-277. (Pubitemid 32693211)
11. Malchow, M. B., and A. Kanafani. A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2004, pp. 317-337. (Pubitemid 38688818)
12. Shibasaki, R., T. Kadono, and H. Ieda. Model Improvement of International Maritime Container Cargo Flow and Policy Evaluation for International Logistics in Eastern Asia. Presented at First International Conference on Transport Logistics, Singapore, 2005.
13. Kuroda, K., M. Takebayashi, and T. Tsuji. International Container Transportation Network Analysis Considering Post-Panamax Class Container Ships. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 13, 2005, pp. 369-391. (Pubitemid 43588741)
14. Song, D., J. Zhang, J. Carter, T. Field, J. Marshall, J. Polak, K. Schumacher, P. Sinha-Ray, and J. Woods. On Cost-Efficiency of the Global Container Shipping Network. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2005, pp. 15-30. (Pubitemid 40382936)
15. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.
16. Service Routes. OOCL, Hong Kong. http://www.oocl.com/eng/ourservices/ serviceroutes/tpt. Accessed July 4, 2010.
17. Maersk Line Sailing Schedules. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www. maerskline.com/frameset.jsp. Accessed July 4, 2010.
18. Province GDP Ranking. Keyia. http://www.keyia.net/finance/chenshipaiming/ 2009/3982.html. Accessed July 4, 2010.
19. American Association of Port Authorities. Port Industry Statistics. Alexandria, Va. http://www.aapa-ports.org/Industry/content. cfmItemNumber900&navItemNumber549. Accessed July 4, 2010.
20. Meng, Q., and X. Wang. Utility-Based Estimation of Probabilistic Port Hinterland for Networks of Intermodal Freight Transportation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2168, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 53-62.
21. Imai, A., K. Shintani, and S. Papadimitriou. Multi-Port vs. Hub-and-Spoke Port Calls by Containerships. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 45, 2009, pp. 740-757.
22. Leachman, R. C. Port and Modal Allocation of Waterborne Containerized Imports from Asia to the United States. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2008, pp. 313-331. (Pubitemid 350020829)
23. Port of Tanjung Pelepas. History Journey of 2000. Johor, Malaysia. http://www.ptp.com.my/history-2000.html. Accessed July 4, 2010.