The ultimate irrelevance proposition in finance?

Financial Review

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 485-512

  Karolyi, G Andrew ^a  

^a Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management   (United States)

Author keywords

Econometric methodology; Educational and research institutions; Financial economics

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053599109     PISSN: 07328516     EISSN: 15406288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6288.2011.00309.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aghion, P., M. Dewatripont, C. Hoxby, A. Mas-Colell, and A. Sapir, 2010. The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the U.S., Economic Policy 61, 7-59.
2. Angrist, J.D. and J.-S. Pischke, 2010. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 3-30.
3. Barber, B. and T. Odean, 1999. Boys will be boys: Gender overconfidence and common stock investment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 261-292.
4. Benyamini Y., E.A. Leventhal, and H. Leventhal, 2000. Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessment of health, Psychosomatic Medicine 62, 354-364.
5. Cardoso, A.R., P. Guimaraes, and K.F. Zimmermann, 2010. Trends in economic research: An international perspective, KyKlos 63, 479-494.
6. Darley, W.K. and R.E. Smith, 1995. Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response, Journal of Advertising 24(1), 41-56.
7. Dewald, W.G., J.G. Thursby, and R.G. Anderson, 1986. Replication in empirical economics: The journal of money, credit, and banking project, American Economic Review 76, 587-603.
8. Ellison, G., 2002a. The slowdown of the economics publishing process, Journal of Political Economy 110, 947-993.
9. Ellison, G., 2002b. Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory, Journal of Political Economy 110, 994-1034.
10. Ellison, G., 2010. Is peer review in decline Economic Inquiry 49, 635-657.
11. Glandon, P., 2010. Report on the American economic review data availability compliance project. Unpublished Working paper, Vanderbilt University.
12. Hendry, D.F., 1980. Econometrics-Alchemy or science Economica 47, 387-406.
13. Kim, E.H., A. Morse, and L. Zingales, 2008. Are elite universities losing their competitive edge Journal of Financial Economics 93, 353-381.
14. Laroche, M., M. Cleveland, J. Bergeron, and C. Goutaland, 2003. The knowledge-experience-evaluation relationship: A structural equations modeling test of gender differences, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 20, 246-259.
15. Leamer, E., 1983. Let's take the con out of econometrics, American Economic Review 73, 31-43.
16. Leamer, E., 2010. Tantalus on the road to asymptopia, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 31-46.
17. McCloskey, D.N., 1985. The loss function has been mislaid: The rhetoric of significance tests, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 75, 201-205.
18. McCloskey, D.N., 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).
19. McCloskey, D.N., 2002. The Secret Sins of Economics (Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, IL).
20. McCloskey, D.N. and S. Ziliak, 1996. The standard error of regressions, Journal of Economic Literature 34, 97-114.
21. Mishkin, F.S., 1981. Are market forecasts rational American Economic Review 71, 295-305.
22. Nevo, A., and M.D. Whinston, 2010. Taking the dogma out of econometrics: Structural modeling and credible inference, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 69-82.
23. Sims, C.A., 1980. Macroeconomics and reality, Econometrica 48, 1-48.
24. Sims, C.A., 2010. But economics is not an experimental science, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 59-68.
25. Stock, J., 2010. The other transformation in econometric practice: robust tools for inference, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 83-94.