Visual events and electronic government: What do pictures mean in digital government for citizen relations?

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 457-465

  Bekkers, Victor ^a   Moody, Rebecca ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

E government; Visual culture; Visualization

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053591752     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersen K., Danziger J. Impacts of IT on politics and the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration 2001, 25(5):591-627.
2. Argyirs C., Schön D. Organizational learning 1978, McGraw Hill, Boston.
3. Bauman Z. Liquid modernity 2000, Polity Press, Cambridge.
4. Bekkers V., Beunders H., Edwards A., Moody R. De virtuele lont in het Kruitvat 2009, Lemma, Den Haag.
5. The information ecology of e-Government 2005, IOS Press, Amsterdam. V. Bekkers, V. Homburg (Eds.).
6. Bekkers V., Meijer A. Co-creatie in de publieke sector 2010, Boom, Den Haag.
7. Bennett L., Entmann R. Mediated politics: An introduction. Mediated politics 2001, 1-29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. L. Bennett, R. Entmann (Eds.).
8. Benoit W., Benoit P. Persuasive messages 2008, Blackwell, Oxford.
9. The social construction of technological systems 1987, MIT Press, Cambridge. W. Bijker (Ed.).
10. Boulos K., Wheeler S. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2007, 24(1):2-23.
11. Castells M. The rise of the network society 1996, Blackwell, Cambridge.
12. Castells M. The end of the millennium, the information age: Economy, society, and culture 1998, Blackwell, Cambridge.
13. Castells M. Communication power 2009, Blackwell, Cambridge.
14. Davenport T. Information ecology 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Frissen P. Politics, governance, and technology 1999, Elgar, Cheltenham.
16. Hajer M., Law D. Ordering through discourse. Handbook of public policy 2005, 250-268. Oxford University Press, Oxford. R. Goodin (Ed.).
17. Hall P. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comparative Politics 1993, 25(3):275-296.
18. Hartley J. The politics of pictures 1992, Routledge, London/New York.
19. King G., Keohane R., Verba S. Designing social inquiry 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
20. Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies 1984, Harper, New York.
21. Kling R. The struggle for democracy in an information society. The Information Society 1986, 4(1/2):1-7.
22. Knights D., Murray F. Politics and pain in managing information technology: A case study in insurance. Organization Studies 1992, 13(2):211-228.
23. Kraemer K., King J. Computing and public organization. Public Administration Review 1986, 46:488-496.
24. Kraemer K., King J. Information technology and administrative reform: Will e-Government be different?. International Journal of e-Government Research 2006, 2(1):1-20.
25. Lips M., Schupan T. Transforming e-Government knowledge through public management research. Public Management Review 2009, 11(9):739-749.
26. Louw E. The media and the political process 2005, Sage, Los Angeles.
27. Marcum J. Beyond visual culture: The challenge of visual ecology. Libraries and the Academy 2002, 2(2):189-206.
28. Marsh J., Olsen J. Rediscovering institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics 1989, The Free Press, New York.
29. Mirzoeff N. An introduction to visual culture 1999, Routledge, New York.
30. Mitchell W. Picture theory 1994, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
31. Mitchell W. What do pictures want? 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
32. Moody R. Mapping power 2010, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
33. Moody R., de Kool D., Bekkers V. Virtual neighborhoods and e-Government: A case study comparison. Politics democracy and e-Government: Participation and service delivery 2010, 402-416. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. C.G. Reddick (Ed.).
34. Moon M. The evolution of e-Government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review 2002, 62(4):424-433.
35. Norris P. A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies 2000, Cambridge University Press.
36. O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software Retrieved from. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what_is_web-20.html.
37. OECD The e-Government imperative 2003, OECD, Paris.
38. Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 1991, 3(3):398-427.
39. Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures. Organizational Science 2000, 11(4):404-428.
40. Patton M. Utility-focused evaluation 1997, Sage, London.
41. Pine J., Glimore J.H. The experience economy 1999, Harvard Business Press, Boston.
42. Snow D., Benford R. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International social movement research 1980, 197-217. JAI, Greenwich. B. Klandermans, H.P. Kriesi, S. Tarrow (Eds.).
43. Snow D., Rochford E., Worden S., Benford R. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 1986, 51(4):464-481.
44. Stanyer J. Modern political communication 2007, Polity Press, Cambridge.
45. Stone D. Policy paradox 1997, Norton & Company, New York.
46. Sturken M., Cartwright L. Practices of Looking. An introduction in visual culture 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Weick K. The social psychology of organizing 1969, Adddison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
48. Yin R. Case study research. Design and methods 1994, Sage, London.
49. Zuboff S. In the age of the smart machine 1988, Heineman, Oxford.