IDRA: A flexible system architecture for next generation wireless sensor networks

Wireless Networks

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1423-1440

  Poorter, Eli De ^a   Troubleyn, Evy ^a   Moerman, Ingrid ^a   Demeester, Piet ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Architecture; Energy efficiency; Experimental evaluation; Heterogeneity; Mobility; Protocol selection; QoS; Wireless sensor networks

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL LEVELS; BUILDING AUTOMATION; CENTRAL SYSTEMS; CONSTRAINED DEVICES; EFFICIENCY OPTIMIZATION; EHEALTH; EMBEDDED DEVICE; ENERGY REQUIREMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; FLEXIBLE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE; HETEROGENEITY; LOW POWER; MEMORY REQUIREMENTS; MOBILITY SUPPORTS; NETWORKED OBJECTS; PROCESSING OVERHEAD; PROTOCOL SELECTION; QOS OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED; SPECIFIC TASKS; TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS; WIRED NETWORKS; WIRELESS SENSOR;

ARCHITECTURE; CARRIER MOBILITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; MEMORY ARCHITECTURE; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SENSOR NODES; SENSORS;

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 80053579161     PISSN: 10220038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-011-0356-5     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Poorter, E. D., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2009). An information driven sensornet architecture (best paper award). In The third international conference on sensor technologies and applications (sensorcomm 2009), Athens/Glyfada, Greece, June 18-23.
2. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Skarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38, 393-422. (Pubitemid 34181630)
3. Bharathidasan, A., & Ponduru, V. A. S. (2002). Sensor networks: An overview. Technical report, Department. of Computer Science, University of California at Davis.
4. Yarvis, M., Kushalnagar, N., Singh, H., Rangarajan, A., Liu, Y., & Singh, S. (2005). Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom.
5. Troubleyn, E., Poorter, E. D., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2008). AMoQoSA: Adaptive modular QoS architecture for wireless sensor networks. SENSORCOMM 2008, Cap Esterel, France.
6. Polastre, J., Hui, J., Levis, P., Zhao, J., Culler, D., Shenker, S., & Stoica, I. (2005). A unifying link abstraction for wireless sensor networks. SenSys '05, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 76-89.
7. Braden, R., Faber, T., & Handley, M. (2003). From protocol stack to protocol heap: role-based architecture. SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, 33(1), 17-22.
8. Culler, D., Dutta, P., Eee, C. T., Fonseca, R., Hui, J., Levis, P., et al. (2005). Towards a sensor network architecture: Lowering the waistline. In Proceedings of the tenth workshop on hot topics in operating systems (HotOS X).
9. Dunkels, A., Österlind, F., & He, Z. (2007). An adaptive communication architecture for wireless sensor networks. In SenSys '07: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, (pp. 335-349). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
10. Demirkol, I., Ersoy, C., & Alagoz, F. (2005). MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine.
11. Rajagopalan, R., & Varshney, P. K. (2006). Data-aggregation techniques in sensor networks: A survey. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 8(4), 48-63. Fourth Quarter.
12. Fasolo, E., Rossi, M., Widmer, J., & Zorzi, M. (2007). In-network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 14(2), 70-87. (Pubitemid 46776305)
13. Hoebeke, J., Moerman, I., Dhoedt, B., & Demeester, P. (2005). Towards adaptive ad hoc network routing. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 1.
14. Evy, T., Eli, D. P., Peter, R., Moerma, I., & Piet, D. (2010). Supporting protocol-independent adaptive qos in wireless sensor networks. In Sensor networks, ubiquitous, and trustworthy computing (SUTC), 2010 IEEE international conference on (pp. 253-260).
15. Ali, M., Voigt, T., & Uzmi, Z. A. (2006). Mobility management in sensor networks. Workshop proceedings of 2nd IEEE DCOSS.
16. Akyildiz, I., & Kasimoglu, I. (2004). Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks Journal (Elsevier), 2(4), 351-367.
17. The internet of things. ITU Internet Reports. (2005).
18. Ibbt ilab.t wireless sensor test bed. http://ilabt.ibbt.be.
19. Tytgat, L., Jooris, B., De Mil, P., Latre, B., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2009). Demo abstract: Wilab, a real-life wireless sensor testbed with environment emulation. Published in European conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, EWSN adjunct poster proceedings (EWSN), Cork, Ireland.
20. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. networking group request for comments (rfc): 3561, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3561, (July 2003).
21. Poorter, E. D., Bouckaert, S., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2010). Non-intrusive aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks Journal (Elsevier).
22. Osterlind, F., & Dunkels, A. (2008). Approaching the maximum 802.15.4 multi-hop throughput. Technical report, Swedish Institute of Computer Science, SICS Technical Report T2008:05, ISSN 1100-3154.
23. Collection Tree Protocol (CTP) for tinyOS 2.x. (2008). http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep123.htm.
24. Tinyos operating system. http://www.tinyos.net.
25. Buettner, M., Yee, G., Anderson, E., & Han, R. (2006). X-MAC: A short preamble mac protocol for duty-cycledwireless networks (pp. 307-320). Boulder, CO. (Pubitemid 47168695)
26. Ye, W., Silva, F., & Heidemann, J. (2006). Ultra-low duty cycle mac with scheduled channel polling (pp. 321-334). Boulder, CO.
27. UNAR-Lightweight Underlay Network Ad hoc Routing. (2008). http://cn.cs.unibas.ch/projects/lunar.
28. Tymo source code repository. tymo: Dymo implementation for tinyos. http://tymo.sourceforge.ne.
29. Hill, J., & Culler, D. (2002). Mica: A wireless platform for deeply embedded networks. IEEE Micro, 22(6), 12-24.
30. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2002). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 21st conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM), Vol. 3, (pp. 1567-1576).
31. Tavakoli, A., & Culler, D. (2009). HYDRO: A hybrid routing protocol for lossy and low power networks. IETF Internet Draft, http://tools.ietf.org/ html/draft-tavakoli-hydro-0.
32. Chakeres, I.D., & Perkins, C. E. (2008). Dynamic manet on-demand routing protocol (dymo). IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manetdymo- 12.txt, http://ianchak.com/dymo/draft-ietf-manet-dymo-12.htm.
33. Tavakoli, A., Dutta, P., Jeong, J., Kim, S., Ortiz, J., Culler, D., Levis, P., & Shenker, S. (2007). A modular sensornet architecture: past, present, and future directions. SIGBED Rev., 4(3), 49-54.
34. Ee, C. T., Fonseca, R., Kim, S., Moon, D., Tavakoli, A., Culler, D., Shenker, S., & Stoica, I. (November 2006). A modular network layer for sensornets. In the Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 2006), Seattle, WA.
35. Klues, K., Hackmann, G., Chipara, O., & Lu, C. (2007). A component- based architecture for power-efficient media access control in wireless sensor networks. In SenSys '07: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 59-72). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
36. Contiki - the operating system for embedded smart objects-the internet of things. http://www.sics.se/contiki.
37. Tavakoli, A., Chu, D., Hellerstein, J. M., Levis, P., & Shenker, S. (2007). A declarative sensornet architecture. SIGBED Rev., 4(3), 55-60.
38. Chu, D., Hellerstein, J. M., te Lai, T. (2008). Optimizing declarative sensornets. In SenSys '08: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, (pp. 403-404). New York, NY, USA, ACM.
39. Melodia, T., Vuran, M. C., & Pompili, D. (2006). The state of the art in cross-layer design for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Syst./Network Architect., LNCS 3883, pp. 78-92. (Pubitemid 44011664)