Imaging of the skin and subcutaneous tissue using classical and high-frequency ultrasonographies in anti-cellulite therapy

Skin Research and Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 461-468

  Mlosek, Robert Krzysztof ^a   De bowska, Renata Maria ^b   Lewandowski, Marcin ^c   Malinowska, Sylwia ^d   Nowicki, Andrzej ^c   Eris, Irena ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b Dr Irena Eris Cosmetic Laboratories   (Poland)

^c INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Poland)

^d Life Beauty ^*  (Poland)

Author keywords

Cellulite; Classic ultrasonography; High frequency ultrasonography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

CELLULITE; ECHOGENICITY; HIGH-FREQUENCY ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PLACEBO GROUPS; SECOND GROUP; SKIN IMAGING; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES; SURFACE AREA; ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION;

DERMATOLOGY; TISSUE;

ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

PLACEBO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELLULITE; CLASSIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREAM; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; DERMIS THICKNESS; ECHOGENICITY; ECHOGRAPHY; EPIDERMIS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HIGH FREQUENCY ULTRASONOGRAPHY; HUMAN; SKIN; SKIN EDEMA; SKIN EXAMINATION; SKIN FIBROSIS; SKIN SURFACE AREA; SUBCUTANEOUS LENGTH; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE LENGTH; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE THICKNESS; THICKNESS;

ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; ADULT; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; DERMATOLOGIC AGENTS; DERMIS; EDEMA; EMOLLIENTS; EPIDERMIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PLACEBOS; SUBCUTANEOUS FAT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053568817     PISSN: 0909752X     EISSN: 16000846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00519.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. st ed. Medipage, 2003; 61-63.
2. Yano T, Fukuita H, Ueno S, Fukumoto A. 40MHz ultrasound diagnostics system for dermatologic examination. IEEE 1987 Ultrason Symp Proc 1987: doi: DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.1987.199084.
3. Lien MH, Sondak VK. Diagnostic techniques for primary cutaneous melanoma. 2009; 144: 187-194.
4. Ulrich M, Stockfleth E, Roewert-Huber J, Astner S. Noninvasive diagnostic tools for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157 (Suppl. 2): 56-58.
5. Uren RF, Sanki A, Thompson JF. The utility of ultrasound in patients with melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2007; 7: 1633-1642.
6. Mlosek RK. Ultrasonografia skóry. Slużba Zdrowia 1997; 6: 35-36.
7. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Burgdorf W. Ultrasound scanning in dermatology. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141: 217-224.
8. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Dill-Müller D. Ultrasound technology in dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2008; 27: 44-51.
9. Szymańska E, Nowicki A, Mlosek RK et al. Skin imaging with high frequency ultrasound-preliminary results. Eur J Ultrasound 2000; 12: 9-16.
10. Wortsman XC, Holm EA, Wulf HC et al. Real-time spatial compound ultrasound imaging of skin. Skin Res Technol 2008; 10: 23-31.
11. Zmudzinska M, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Silny W. Principles of dermatologic ultrasound diagnostics. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 2008; 16: 126-129.
12. Gniadecka M, Jamec GBE. Quantitative evaluation of chronological ageing and photoageing in vivo: studies on skin echogenicity and thickness. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 815-821.
13. Gniadecka M. Effects of ageing on dermal echogenicity. Skin Res Technol 2001; 7: 204-207.
14. Blaszczyk-Kostanecka M, Wolska H. (red.) Dermatologia w praktyce. Warsaw: PZWL - wydawnictwo Lekarskie, 2006
15. Pugliese PT. The pathogenesis of cellulite: a New concept. J Cosmet Dermatol 2007; 6: 140-142.
16. Wollina U, Gildman A, Berger U. Esthetic and cosmetic dermatology. Dermatol Ther 2008; 21: 118-150.
17. Zaleska-Zylka I. Cellulit jako problem medyczny. Probl Hig Epidemiol 2008; 89: 487-491.
18. Nürnberger F, Müller G. So called cellulite: an invented disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1978; 4: 221-229.
19. Ortonne JP, Zartarian M, Verschoore M et al. Cellulite and skin ageing: is there any interaction? JEADV 2008; 22: 827-834.
20. Vincent C, Szubert M, Dêbowska R et al. Zastosowanie termografii w diagnostyce cellulite. Dermatol Estet 2006; 8: 85-89.
21. Bielfeldt S, Buttgereit P, Brandt M et al. Non-invasive evaluation techniques to quantify the efficacy of cosmetic anti-cellulite products. Skin Res Technol 2008; 14: 336-346.
22. Ferrozzi F, Zuccoli G, Tognini G et al. An assessment of abdominal fatty tissue distribution in obese children. A comparison between echography and computed tomography. Radiol Med 1999; 98: 490-494.
23. Hexsel DM, Abreu M, Rodrigues TC et al. Side-by-side comparison of areas with and without cellulite depressions using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35: 1471-1477.
24. Mlosek RK, Debowska R, Lewandowski M et al. The use of high frequency ultrasonography in monitoring anti-cellulite therapy - own experience. Pol J Cosmetol 2008; 11: 283-294.
25. Querlux B, Cornillon C, Jolivet O. Anatomy and physiology of subcutaneous adipose tissue by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: relationships with sex and presence of cellulite. Skin Res Technol 2002; 8: 118-124.
26. Bialynicki-Birula R, Baran E, Kuliś-Orzechowska R. Ocena przeciwcellulitowego dzialania preparatów na bazie wyciagów borowinowych. Efficacy evaluation of anti-cellulite activity of cosmetics containing mud - extractions. Dermatologia Estetyczna 2004; 3: 155-159.
27. Rosenbaum M, Prieto V, Hellmer J et al. An exploratory investigation of the morphology and biochemistry of cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101: 1934-1939.
28. Batisse D, Bazin R, Baldeweck T et al. Influence of age on wrinkling capacities if skin. Skin Res Technol 2002; 8: 148-154.
29. Sandby-Møller J, Thieden E, Philipsen PA, Schmidt G, Wulf HC. Dermal echogenicity: a biological indicator of individual cumulative UVR exposure? Arch Dermatol Res 2004; 295: 498-504.