EMOLST: A documentation flow for distributed health informatics

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 23, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 1857-1867

  Von Laszewski, Gregor ^a   Dayal, Jai ^b   Wang, Lizhe ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

distributed system; health informatics; workflow

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT TREATMENT; PORTALS; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHRS); HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS; INTEGRATING THE HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE; MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; USER AUTHENTICATION; WORKFLOW;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE;

EID: 80053557137     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1745     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bomba P,. Excellus BlueCross, and New York State Department of Health. Molst-Medical orders for life-sustaining treatment. Health Form, August 2008.
2. Dogac A, Namli T,. Implementation experiences on ihe xua and bppc. Technical Report, Software Research and Development Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, December 2006.
3. Koppar AR, Sridhar V,. A workflow solution for electronic health records to improve healthcare delivery efficiency in rural India. eTELEMED, Cancun, Mexico, 2009; 227-232.
4. Katt B, Breu R, Hafner M, Schabetsberger T, Mair R, Wozak F,. Privacy and access control for ihe-based systems. eHealth, London, U.K., 2008; 145-153.
5. Chen J, Yang Y,. Temporal dependency based checkpoint selection for dagoynamic verification of temporal constraints in scientific workflow systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 2009. Available at: http://www.swinflow.org/papers/TOSEM.pdf [17 June 2009 ].
6. Wang M, Kotagiri R, Chen J,. Trust-based robust scheduling and runtime adaptation of scientific workflow. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. Wiley: New York, 2009; 1982-1998. ISSN: 1532-0626.
7. Wang L, Kunze M, Tao J,. Performance evaluation of virtual machine-based grid workflow system. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2008; 20 (15): 1759-1771.
8. Wang L,. Implementation and performance evaluation of the parallel corba application on computational grids. Advances in Engineering Software 2008; 39 (3): 211-218. (Pubitemid 350213399)
9. Bomba P,. Excellus BlueCross, and New York State Department of Health. Molst-Supplemental documentation form for adults. Health Form, August 2008.
10. New York State Department of Health. Medical orders for life sustaining treatment (molst).
11. Maler E, Reed D,. The venn of identity: Options and issues in federated identity management. IEEE Security & Privacy 2008; 6 (2): 16-23. (Pubitemid 351506252)
12. Wuyts K, Scandariato R, Claeys G, Joosen W,. Hardening xds-based architectures. ARES, Barcelona, Spain, 2008; 18-25.
13. Dogac A, Bicer V, Okcan A,. Collaborative business process support in ihe xds through ebxml business processes. ICDE, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A., 2006; 91.
14. IHE International. Ihe it infrastructure (iti) technical framework. Technical Report, IHE International, December 2008.
15. Recordon D, Reed D,. Openid 2.0: A platform for user-centric identity management. Digital Identity Management, Alexandria, VA, U.S.A., 2006; 11-16.
16. Oh H-K, Jin S-H,. The security limitations of sso in openid. 10th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT'08, Gangwon-Do, South Korea, vol. 3, 2008; 1608-1611. (Pubitemid 351714829)
17. Na S, Cheon S,. Role delegation in role-based access control. RBAC '00: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Workshop on Role-based Access Control. ACM: New York, NY, U.S.A., 2000; 39-44.
18. Colantonio A, Di Pietro R, Ocello A, Vincenzo Verde N,. A formal framework to elicit roles with business meaning in rbac systems. SACMAT '09: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. ACM: New York, NY, U.S.A., 2009; 85-94.
19. Chevalier Y, Küsters R, Rusinowitch M, Turuani M,. Complexity results for security protocols with Diffie-Hellman exponentiation and commuting public key encryption. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2008; 9 (4): 1-52.
20. Panayappan A, Anand S, Pushpakath RP,. Intelligent agents as trust negotiators for federated security. ICWS, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A., 2007; 1183-1184.
21. Eryilmaz E, Cochran M, Kasemvilas S,. Establishing trust management in an open source collaborative information repository: An emergency response information system case study. HICSS, Waikoloa, Big Island, HI, U.S.A., 2009; 1-10.
22. Weaver AC, Wu Z,. Using web service enhancements to establish trust relationships with privacy protection (extended and invited from icws 2006 with id 47). International Journal of Web Services Research 2009; 6 (1): 49-68.