Towards a one size fits all database architecture: [Outrageous ideas and vision track]

CIDR 2011 - 5th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 195-198

  Dittrich, Jens ^a   Jindal, Alekh ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLUMN-STORE; DATA PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE; DATABASE ARCHITECTURE; PHYSICAL DATA; STORAGE STRUCTURES;

ARCHITECTURE; DATA HANDLING;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053537054     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Ailamaki, D. J. DeWitt, M. D. Hill, and M. Skounakis. Weaving Relations for Cache Performance. In VLDB, 2001.
2. P. A. Boncz, M. Zukowski, and N. Nes. MonetDB/X100: Hyper-Pipelining Query Execution. In CIDR, 2005.
3. G. Candea et al. A Scalable, Predictable Join Operator for Highly Concurrent Data Warehouses. In PVLDB, 2009.
4. S. Chaudhuri and G. Weikum. Rethinking Database System Architecture: Towards a Self-Tuning RISC-Style Database System. In VLDB, 2000.
5. P. Cudré-Mauroux et al. The Case for RodentStore: An Adaptive, Declarative Storage System. In CIDR, 2009.
6. N. Dindar et al. DejaVu: declarative pattern matching over live and archived streams of events (Demo). In SIGMOD, 2009.
7. J. Dittrich and A. Jindal. A method for storing and accessing data in a database system. Patent Application, 2010.
8. J.-P. Dittrich, P. M. Fischer, and D. Kossmann. AGILE: adaptive indexing for context-aware information filters. In SIGMOD, 2005.
9. C. D. French. "One size fits all" database architectures do not work for DSS. In SIGMOD, 1995.
10. C. D. French. Teaching an OLTP Database Kernel Advanced Data Warehousing Techniques. In ICDE, 1997.
11. A. L. Holloway et al. How to Barter Bits for Chronons: Compression and Bandwidth Trade Offs for Database Scans. In SIGMOD, 2007.
12. S. Idreos and otherts. Database Cracking. In CIDR, 2007.
13. A. Jindal. The Mimicking Octopus: Towards a one-size-fits-all Database Architecture. In VLDB PhD Workshop, 2010.
14. R. Kallman et al. H-Store: A High-Performance, Distributed Main Memory Transaction Processing System (Demo). In PVLDB, 2008.
15. C. Mohan et al. ARIES: A Transaction Recovery Method Supporting Fine-Granularity Locking and Partial Rollbacks Using Write-Ahead Logging. ACM TODS, 17(1):94-162, 1992. (Pubitemid 23609944)
16. C. Olston et al. Pig Latin: a Not-So-Foreign Language for Data Processing. In SIGMOD, 2008.
17. R. Ramamurthy, D. J. DeWitt, and Q. Su. A Case for Fractured Mirrors. In VLDB, 2002.
18. V. Raman et al. Constant-Time Query Processing. In ICDE, 2008.
19. M. Stonebraker. The Case For Partial Indexes. SIGMOD Rec., 18(4):4-11, 1989.
20. M. Stonebraker and U. Cetintemel. "One Size Fits All": An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone (Abstract). In ICDE, 2005.
21. M. Stonebraker et al. One Size Fits All? Part 2: Benchmarking Studies. In CIDR, 2007.
22. M. Stonebraker et al. The End of an Architectural Era (It's Time for a Complete Rewrite). In VLDB, 2007.
23. D. Terry, D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, and B. Oki. Continuous Queries over Append-Only Databases. In SIGMOD, 1992.
24. O. G. Tsatalos et al. The GMAP: A Versatile Tool for Physical Data Independence. VLDB J., 5(2):101-118, 1996. (Pubitemid 126704132)
25. P. Unterbrunner et al. Predictable Performance for Unpredictable Workloads. In PVLDB, 2009.