A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for salivary gland lesions

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 136, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 516-526

  Schmidt, Robert L ^a   Hall, Brian J ^a   Layfield, Lester J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Core biopsy; Meta analysis; Salivary gland; Sensitivity and specificity; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMATOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SALIVARY GLAND BIOPSY; SALIVARY GLAND DISEASE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ULTRASOUND GUIDED CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; ROC CURVE; SALIVARY GLAND NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80053527279     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: 19437722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCP5LTQ4RVOQAIT     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Taki S, Yamamoto T, Kawai A, et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the salivary gland masses: safety and efficacy. Clin Imaging. 2005;29:189-194. (Pubitemid 40602803)
2. Lin AC, Bhattacharyya N. The utility of fine needle aspiration in parotid malignancy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:793-798. (Pubitemid 46660241)
3. Eisele DW, Koch WM, Richtsmeier WJ, et al. Utility of immediate on-site cytopathological procurement and evaluation in fine needle aspiration biopsy of head and neck masses. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:1328-1330.
4. Singh N, Ryan D, Berney D, et al. Inadequate rates are lower when FNAC samples are taken by cytopathologists. Cytopathology. 2003;14:327-331. (Pubitemid 37521863)
5. Kocjan G, Chandra A, Cross P, et al. BSCC Code of Practice: fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology. 2009;20:283-296.
6. Schmidt RL, Hall BJ, Wilson AR, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for parotid gland lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:45-49.
7. Breeze J, Andi A, Williams MD, et al. The use of fine needle core biopsy under ultrasound guidance in the diagnosis of a parotid mass. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:78-79.
8. Leeflang MMG, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, et al. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:889-897.
9. Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis CA, ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009. Available at http://srdta.cochrane.org/handbook-dta-reviews. Accessed September 15, 2010.
10. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25.
11. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AWS, et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-9.
12. Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20:2865-2884. (Pubitemid 32923212)
13. Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, et al. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies [published correction appears in Biostatistics. 2008;9:779]. Biostatistics. 2007;8:239-251. (Pubitemid 46569586)
14. Harbord RM, Whiting P. Metandi: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J. 2009;9:211-229.
15. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539-1558. (Pubitemid 34746062)
16. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560. (Pubitemid 37088507)
17. Yamashita Y, Kurokawa H, Takeda S, et al. Preoperative histologic assessment of head and neck lesions using cutting needle biopsy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:528-533. (Pubitemid 41124641)
18. Naqvi SQH, Shaikh S, Shah SQA, et al. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for salivary gland lesions. Gomal J Med Sci. 2008;6. Available at http://www.gjms.com.pk/files/GJMS%20Vol-6-1.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2010.
19. Wan Y-L, Chan S-C, Chen Y-L, et al. Ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy of parotid gland masses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1608-1612. (Pubitemid 44383621)
20. Howlett DC, Harper B, Quante M, et al. Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121:571-579. (Pubitemid 46800183)
21. Kesse KW, Manjaly G, Violaris N, et al. Ultrasound-guided biopsy in the evaluation of focal lesions and diffuse swelling of the parotid gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40:384-388. (Pubitemid 35256353)
22. Buckland JR, Manjaly G, Violaris N, et al. Ultrasound-guided cutting-needle biopsy of the parotid gland. J Laryngol Otol. 1999;113:988-992.
23. Pratap R, Qayyum A, Ahmed N, et al. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of parotid gland swellings. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:449-452.
24. Schmidt RL, Hunt JP, Hall BJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section for parotid gland lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. In press.
25. Renshaw AA, Cartagena N, Granter SR, et al. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119:797-800. (Pubitemid 37047839)
26. Brennan PA, Davies B, Poller D, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of salivary gland tumours: repeat aspiration provides further information in cases with an unclear initial cytological diagnosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:26-29.