Multiple task demands in action disorganization syndrome

Neurocase

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 461-472

  Morady, Kamelia ^a   Humphreys, Glyn ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES IPM   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action disorganization syndrome; Action schema; Everyday action; Task demands

Indexed keywords

ACTION DISORGANIZATION SYNDROME; ADULT; ALEXIA; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISORIENTATION; DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEMORY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL GYRUS; WECHSLER MEMORY SCALE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SYNDROME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 80053505374     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: 14653656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2010.532144     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Belke, E., Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., Meyer, A. S., & Telling, A. L. (in press). Effects of top-down semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics.
2. Bickerton, W., Humphreys, G. W., and Riddoch, M. J. (2006). The use of memorised verbal scripts in the rehabilitation of action disorganisation syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16, 155-177.
3. Bickerton, W., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2007). The case of the unfamiliar implement: Schema-based over-riding of semantic knowledge from objects in everyday action. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 1035-1046.
4. Botvinick, M., & Bylsma, L. M. (2005). Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: Evidence for a dynamic representation of task context. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1011-1017.
5. Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action: Psychological Review, 111, 395, 429.
6. Chainay, H., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002) Neuropsychological evidence for a convergent route model for action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 67-93.
7. Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2000). Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 297-338.
8. Field, A. (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
9. Forde, E. M. E., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Dissociation in routine behaviour across patients and everyday tasks. Neurocase, 8, 151-167.
10. Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Mathews, C. G. (1991). Comprehensive norms for expanded Halstread-Reitan bat-tery. Odessa, FL: Psychological assessment Recourses.
11. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (1998). Disordered action schema and action disorganization syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 771-811.
12. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2005). Naming a giraffe but not an animal: Base-level but not subordinate naming in a patient with impaired semantics. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 539-558.
13. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2003) A case series analysis of category-specific deficits of living things: The HIT account. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 263-306.
14. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2006). Features, objects, action: The cognitive neuropsychology of vision from 1984-2004. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 156-183.
15. Humphreys, G. W., Forde, E. M. E., & Francis, D. (2000). The sequential organisation of action. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Humphreys, G. W., Yoon, E. Y., Kumar, S., Lestou, V., Kitadono, K., Roberts, K. L., & Riddoch, M. J. (2010). The interaction of attention and action: From seeing action to acting on perception. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 185-206.
17. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46, 774-785.
18. Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788-798.
19. Moores, E., Laiti L., & Chelazzi L. (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 182-189.
20. Morady, K., & Humphreys, G. (2009). Comparing action disorganization syndrome and dual-task load on normal performance in everyday action tasks. Neurocase, 15, 1-12.
21. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
22. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). The Birmingham Object Recognition Battery (BORB). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
23. Roberts, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (in press) Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system. Neuroimage.
24. Schwartz, M. F. (1995). Re-examining the role of executive functions in routine action production. In J. Grafman, K. J. Holyoke, & F. Boller (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769. Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex (pp. 321-335). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
25. Schwartz, M. F., Reed, E. S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N. H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganization after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 381-414.
26. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
27. Wechsler, D. (1990). Wechsler Memory Scale. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.