Economic and environmental impacts of insulation in district heating pipelines

Energy

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 6156-6164

  Başoĝul, Yusuf ^a   Keçebaş, Ali ^b  

^a SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b AFYON KOCATEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Air pollution; District heating; Economic impact; Environment impact; Pipe insulation

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISTRICT HEATING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FUELS; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; HEATING; INVESTMENTS; PIPE; PIPELINES; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

BUILDING PROJECTS; DISTRICT HEATING PIPELINES; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; ENVIRONMENT IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION; FUEL TYPES; HEATING LOAD; LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS; OPTIMUM INSULATION THICKNESS; OPTIMUM THICKNESS; PAYBACK PERIODS; PIPE INSULATION; PIPELINE MATERIALS;

THERMAL INSULATION;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON MONOXIDE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; HEATING; INFLATION; INSULATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PIPE; PIPELINE; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

AFYON; TURKEY;

EID: 80053455532     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.049     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ogulata R.T. Sectoral energy consumption in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2002, (6):471-480.
2. Arici M., Karabay H. Determination of optimum thickness of double-glazed windows for the climatic regions of Turkey. Energy and Buildings 2010, 42:1773-1778.
3. Dombayci Ö.A., Gölcü M., Pancar Y. Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy-sources. Applied Energy 2006, 83:921-928.
4. Kalyon M., Sahin A.Z. Application of optimal control theory in pipe insulation. Numerical Heat Transfer Part A 2002, 41:391-402.
5. Lund H., Andersen A.N. Optimal designs of small CHP plants in a market with fluctuating electricity prices. Energy Conversion and Management 2005, 46:893-904.
6. Andersen A.N., Lund H. New CHP partnerships offering balancing of fluctuating renewable electricity productions. Journal of Cleaner Production 2007, 15:288-293.
7. Lund H., Möller B., Mathiesen B.V., Dyrelund A. The role of district heating in future renewable energy systems. Energy 2010, 35:1381-1390.
8. Østergaard P.A., Mathiesen B.V., Möller B., Lund H. A renewable energy scenario for Aalborg Municipality based on low-temperature geothermal heat, wind power and biomass. Energy 2010, 35:4892-4901.
9. Østergaard P.A., Lund H. A renewable energy system in Frederikshavn using low-temperature geothermal energy for district heating. Applied Energy 2011, 88:487-497.
10. Mahlia T.M.I., Taufiq B.N., Ismail Masjuki H.H. Correlation between thermal conductivity and the thickness of selected insulation materials for building wall. Energy and Buildings 2007, 39:182-187.
11. Fayaz R., Kari B. Comparison of energy conservation building codes of Iran, Turkey, Germany, China, ISO 9164 and EN. Applied Energy 2009, 86:1949-1955.
12. Daouas N., Hassen Z., Aissia H. Analytical periodic solution for the study of thermal performance and optimum insulation thickness of building walls in Tunisia. Applied Thermal Engineering 2010, 30:319-326.
13. Kecebas A., Kayveci M. Effect on optimum insulation thickness, cost and saving of storage design temperature in cold storage in Turkey. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A 2010, 25:117-127.
14. Zaki G.M., Al-Turki A.M. Optimization of multilayer thermal insulation for pipelines. Heat Transfer Engineering 2000, 21:63-70.
15. Bahadori A., Vuthaluru H.B. A simple correlation for estimation of economic thickness of thermal insulation for process piping and equipment. Applied Thermal Engineering 2010, 30:254-259.
16. Soponpongpipat N., Jaruyanon P., Nanetoe S. The thermo-economics analysis of the optimum thickness of double-layer insulation for air conditioning duct. Energy Research Journal 2010, 1:146-151.
17. Öztürk I.T., Karabay H., Bilgen E. Thermo-economic optimization of hot water piping systems: a comparison study. Energy 2006, 31:2094-2107.
18. Çomakli K., Yüksel B. Environmental impact of thermal insulation thickness in building. Applied Thermal Engineering 2004, 24:933-940.
19. Arslan O., Kose R. Thermoeconomic optimization of insulation thickness considering condensed vapour in buildings. Energy and Buildings 2006, 38:1400-1408.
20. Dombayci Ö.A. The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings. Building and Environment 2007, 42:3855-3859.
21. Yildiz A., Gürlek G., Erkek M., Özbalta N. Economical and environmental analyses of thermal insulation thickness in buildings. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology 2008, 28:25-34.
22. Uçar A., Balo F. Determination of environmental impact and optimum thickness of insulation for building walls. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 2011, 30(1):113-122.
23. Kurt H. The usage of air gap in the composite wall for energy saving and air pollution. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 2011, 30(3):450-458.
24. Keçebas A., Gedik E., Kayfeci M. The effect of using geothermal energy and natural gas on air pollution arisen from using fossil fuels: afyon example. Electronic Journal of Machine Technologies 2010, 7:23-30.
25. Borat O., Balci M., Surmen A. Yanma (Aerotermokimya) Bilgisi. Teknik Egitim Vakfi Yayinlari-4, DAYM 1992, Matbaasi, Ankara, Turkey, [in Turkish].
26. Teknik T.Y., Yayincilik Inc. Journal of Turkish Plumbing - Energy Technologies and HVAC Systems 2010, [accessed 15.10.10]. http://www.tesisat.com.tr/.
27. Keçebaş A. Performance and thermo-economic assessments of geothermal district heating system: a case study in Afyon. Turkey Renewable Energy 2010, 36:77-83.
28. Keçebaş A., Kayfeci M., Gedik E. Performance investigation of the Afyon geothermal district heating system for building applications: exergy analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering 2011, 31:1229-1237.