Chemical Entity Semantic Specification: Knowledge representation for efficient semantic cheminformatics and facile data integration

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Chepelev, Leonid L ^a   Dumontier, Michel ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053453585     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-20     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Crossfire Database Suite. http://www.info.crossfiredatabases.com/
2. P de Matos, R Alcantara, A Dekker, M Ennis, J Hastings, K Haug, I Spiteri, S Turner, C Steinbeck, Chemical Entities of Biological Interest: an update. Nucl Acids Res. 38, D249-D254 (2010). doi:10.1093/nar/gkp886
3. Q Li, T Cheng, Y Wang, SH Bryant, PubChem as a public resource for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 15, 1052-1057 (2010). doi:10.1016/j. drudis.2010.10.003
4. ChemSpider Database of Chemical Structures and Property Predictions. http://www.chemspider.com/
5. ChEMBL Database. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/
6. WJ Wiswesser, How the WLN began in 1949 and how it might be in 1999. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 22, 88-93 (1982)
7. D Weininger, SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 28, 31-36 (1988) (Pubitemid 18574254)
8. A McNaught, The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier: InChl - A New Standard for Molecular Informatics. Chem International. 28, 12-15 (2006)
9. Connectivity Table File Formats. http://www.symyx.com/downloads/public/ ctfile/ctfile.jsp
10. S Fujita, XyM Markup Language (XyMML) for Electronic Communication of Chemical Documents Containing Structural Formulas and Reaction Schemes. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 39, 915-927 (1999) (Pubitemid 129579825)
11. P Sankar, G Aghila, Ontology Aided Modeling of Organic Reaction Mechanisms with Flexible and Fragment Based XML Markup Procedures. J Chem Inf Model. 47, 1747-1762 (2007). doi:10.1021/ci700043u (Pubitemid 47561123)
12. P Sankar, K Alain, G Aghila, Model Tool to Describe Chemical Structures in XML Format Utilizing Structural Fragments and Chemical Ontology. J Chem Inf Model. 50, 755-770 (2010). doi:10.1021/ci100052b
13. P Murray-Rust, HS Rzepa, Chemical Markup, XML, and the World Wide Web. 1. Basic Principles. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 39, 928-942 (1999)
14. N Adams, J Winter, P Murray-Rust, HS Rzepa, Chemical Markup, XML and the World-Wide Web. 8. Polymer Markup Language. J Chem Inf Model. 48, 2118-2128 (2008). doi:10.1021/ci8002123
15. Resource Description Framework Specification. http://www.w3.org/RDF/
16. G Hughes, H Mills, D De Roure, JG Frey, L Moreau, MC Schraefel, G Smith, E Zaluska, The semantic smart laboratory: a system for supporting the chemical eScientist. Org Biomol Chem. 2, 3284-3293 (2004). doi:10.1039/b410075a
17. F Belleau, MA Nolin, N Tourigny, P Rigault, J Morissette, Bio2RDF: towards a mashup to build bioinformatics knowledge systems. J Biomed Inform. 41, 706-716 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.004
18. B Chen, X Dong, D Jiao, H Wang, Q Zhu, Y Ding, DJ Wild, Chem2Bio2RDF: a semantic framework for linking and data mining chemogenomic and systems chemical biology data. BMC Bioinformatics. 11, 255-267 (2010). doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11- 255
19. Linking Open Drug Data Project. http://esw.w3.org/HCLSIG/LODD
20. Linking Open Data Initiative. http://esw.w3.org/SweoIG/TaskForces/ CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData
21. M Konyk, A De Leon, M Dumontier, Chemical Knowledge for the Semantic Web. Data Integration in the Life Sciences Conference; June 25-27, 2008; Evry, France. (Springer, 2008), pp. 169-176
22. CHEMINF Ontology. http://semanticchemistry.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ ontology/cheminf.owl
23. Chemical Entity Semantic Specification. http://semanticscience.org/ projects/chess/
24. Semanticscience Integrated Ontology. http://semanticscience.org
25. Semantic Web Rule Language. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
26. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
27. E Fahy, M Sud, D Cotter, S Subramaniam, LIPID MAPS online tools for lipid research. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W606-612 (2007). doi:10.1093/nar/gkm324
28. BigOWLIM High-Performance Semantic Repository. http//www.ontotext. com/owlim
29. FaCT++ Reasoner. http://owl.man. ac.uk/factplusplus/
30. MD Wilkinson, BP Vandervalk, EL McCarthy, SADI SemanticWeb Services - 'cause you can't always GET what you want! Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference; December 7-11, 2009; Singapore (IEEE Press, 2009), pp. 13-18
31. SA Rahman, M Bashton, GL Holliday, R Schrader, JM Thornton, Small Molecule Subgraph Detector (SMSD) toolkit. J Cheminformatics. 1, 12 (2009). doi:10.1186/1758-2946-1-12
32. R Mannhold, A Petrauskas, Substructure versus Whole-molecule Approaches for Calculating Log P. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. 22, 466-475 (2003). doi:10.1002/qsar.200390036 (Pubitemid 36875084)
33. CA Lipinski, Lead-and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov Today: Technologies. 1, 337-341 (2004) (Pubitemid 40186335)
34. Pellet OWL 2 Reasoner. http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/
35. Protégé Ontology Editor. http://protege.stanford.edu/
36. HH Hussain, G Babic, T Durst, JS Wright, M Flueraru, A Chichirau, LL Chepelev, Development of novel antioxidants: design, synthesis, and reactivity. J Org Chem. 68, 7023-7032 (2003). doi:10.1021/jo0301090 (Pubitemid 37071783)
37. Web Ontology Language Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
38. Jena Semantic Web Framework http://jena.sourceforge.net/
39. C Steinbeck, YQ Han, S Kuhn, O Horlacher, E Luttmann, EL Willighagen, The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open-source Java library for chemoand bioinformatics. J Chem Inf Comp Sci. 43, 493-500 (2003)
40. Open Babel Chemistry Toolbox. http://openbabel.org/wiki/Main-Page
41. OpenLink Virtuoso. http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/
42. E Sirin, B Parsia, BC Grau, A Kalyanpur, Y Katz, Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics. 5, 51-53 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03004 (Pubitemid 46856283)