-
1
-
-
85072184020
-
History of minimally invasive surgery
-
Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, G.W. Holcomb, K.E. Georgeson, S.S. Rothenberg (Eds.)
-
St Peter S.D., Holcomb G.W. History of minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopic Surgery in Infants and Children 2009, 1-5. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia. G.W. Holcomb, K.E. Georgeson, S.S. Rothenberg (Eds.).
-
(2009)
Endoscopic Surgery in Infants and Children
, pp. 1-5
-
-
St Peter, S.D.1
Holcomb, G.W.2
-
2
-
-
2942517536
-
Evolution of cholecystectomy: A tribute to Carl August Langenbuch
-
Utpal D. Evolution of cholecystectomy: A tribute to Carl August Langenbuch. Indian J Surg 2004, 66:97-100.
-
(2004)
Indian J Surg
, vol.66
, pp. 97-100
-
-
Utpal, D.1
-
3
-
-
0027923134
-
Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
-
NIH Consensus Development Panel
-
Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 1993, 269:1018-1024. NIH Consensus Development Panel.
-
(1993)
JAMA
, vol.269
, pp. 1018-1024
-
-
-
4
-
-
0036917755
-
Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery
-
Himal H.S. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery. Surg Endosc 2002, 16:1647-1652.
-
(2002)
Surg Endosc
, vol.16
, pp. 1647-1652
-
-
Himal, H.S.1
-
5
-
-
0031115187
-
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial
-
Kazemier G., de Zeeuw G.R., Lange J.F., et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 1997, 11:336-340.
-
(1997)
Surg Endosc
, vol.11
, pp. 336-340
-
-
Kazemier, G.1
de Zeeuw, G.R.2
Lange, J.F.3
-
6
-
-
0026646013
-
A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
-
Attwood S.E., Hill A.D., Murphy P.G., et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 1992, 112:497-501.
-
(1992)
Surgery
, vol.112
, pp. 497-501
-
-
Attwood, S.E.1
Hill, A.D.2
Murphy, P.G.3
-
7
-
-
0027133647
-
Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicostomy
-
Kum C.K., Ngoi S.S., Goh P.M.Y., et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicostomy. Br J Surg 1993, 80:1590-1600.
-
(1993)
Br J Surg
, vol.80
, pp. 1590-1600
-
-
Kum, C.K.1
Ngoi, S.S.2
Goh, P.M.Y.3
-
8
-
-
0031945396
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis
-
Golub R., Siddiqui F., Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:545-553.
-
(1998)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.186
, pp. 545-553
-
-
Golub, R.1
Siddiqui, F.2
Pohl, D.3
-
9
-
-
0030875676
-
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy
-
McCall J.L., Sharples K., Jadallah F. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1997, 84:1045-1050.
-
(1997)
Br J Surg
, vol.84
, pp. 1045-1050
-
-
McCall, J.L.1
Sharples, K.2
Jadallah, F.3
-
10
-
-
4644308994
-
Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis. A prospective study
-
Colizza S., Rossi S., Picardi B., et al. Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis. A prospective study. Chir Ital 2004, 56:397-402.
-
(2004)
Chir Ital
, vol.56
, pp. 397-402
-
-
Colizza, S.1
Rossi, S.2
Picardi, B.3
-
12
-
-
77955516562
-
Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial
-
Tsimoyiannis E.C., Tsimogiannis K.E., Pappas-Gogos G., et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:1842-1848.
-
(2010)
Surg Endosc
, vol.24
, pp. 1842-1848
-
-
Tsimoyiannis, E.C.1
Tsimogiannis, K.E.2
Pappas-Gogos, G.3
-
13
-
-
79551666279
-
Laparoscopic vs transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy; Results of prospective randomized trial
-
Park J.H., Hyun K.H., Park C.H., et al. Laparoscopic vs transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy; Results of prospective randomized trial. J Korean Surg Soc 2010, 78:3213-3216.
-
(2010)
J Korean Surg Soc
, vol.78
, pp. 3213-3216
-
-
Park, J.H.1
Hyun, K.H.2
Park, C.H.3
-
14
-
-
77955218704
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: A prospective randomized study
-
Tugcu V., Ilbey Y.O., Mutlu B., et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: A prospective randomized study. J Endourol 2010, 24:1315-1320.
-
(2010)
J Endourol
, vol.24
, pp. 1315-1320
-
-
Tugcu, V.1
Ilbey, Y.O.2
Mutlu, B.3
-
15
-
-
69249119446
-
Early experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery in children
-
Ponsky T.A., Diluciano J., Chwals W., et al. Early experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009, 19:551-553.
-
(2009)
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
, vol.19
, pp. 551-553
-
-
Ponsky, T.A.1
Diluciano, J.2
Chwals, W.3
-
16
-
-
70349429812
-
A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy
-
Chamberlain R.S., Sakpal S.V. A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2009, 13:1733-1740.
-
(2009)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.13
, pp. 1733-1740
-
-
Chamberlain, R.S.1
Sakpal, S.V.2
-
17
-
-
56349169289
-
Is smaller necessarily better?. A systematic review comparing the effects of Minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes
-
McCloy R., Randall D., Schug S.A., et al. Is smaller necessarily better?. A systematic review comparing the effects of Minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 2008, 22:2541-2553.
-
(2008)
Surg Endosc
, vol.22
, pp. 2541-2553
-
-
McCloy, R.1
Randall, D.2
Schug, S.A.3
-
18
-
-
77950956788
-
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it more than a challenge?
-
online only
-
Ersin S., Firat O., Sozbilen M. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it more than a challenge?. Surg Endosc 2009, 23. online only.
-
(2009)
Surg Endosc
, vol.23
-
-
Ersin, S.1
Firat, O.2
Sozbilen, M.3
-
19
-
-
55649103202
-
Transumbilical single-port surgery: Evolution and current status
-
Canes D., Desai M., Aron M., et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: Evolution and current status. Eur J Urol 2008, 54:1020-1030.
-
(2008)
Eur J Urol
, vol.54
, pp. 1020-1030
-
-
Canes, D.1
Desai, M.2
Aron, M.3
-
20
-
-
69849106209
-
Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: The first 100 patients
-
Hernandez J.M., Morton C.A., Ross S., et al. Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: The first 100 patients. Am Surg 2009, 75:681-686.
-
(2009)
Am Surg
, vol.75
, pp. 681-686
-
-
Hernandez, J.M.1
Morton, C.A.2
Ross, S.3
-
24
-
-
66549120306
-
The patient scar assessment questionnaire: A reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars
-
Durani P., McGrouther D.A., Ferguson M.W. The patient scar assessment questionnaire: A reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009, 123:1481-1489.
-
(2009)
Plast Reconstr Surg
, vol.123
, pp. 1481-1489
-
-
Durani, P.1
McGrouther, D.A.2
Ferguson, M.W.3
|